Abstract
In Canada, all research conducted by individuals associated with universities must be subjected to review by research ethics boards (REB). Unfortunately, decisions reached by REBs may seriously compromise the integrity of university-based research. In this paper attention will focus on how requirements of REBs and a legal department in four Canadian universities affected response rates to a survey of domestic and international students. It will be shown that in universities in which students were sent a legalistic cover letter to a mail survey, or were required to sign a consent form, lower response rates were achieved than in universities in which students were sent a relatively friendly letter. In turn, lower response rates resulted in: sample characteristics that deviated from population characteristics; a reduction in the possibility of testing research hypotheses; and increased survey costs. As a consequence, it is argued that the unreasonable demands of REBs are seriously compromising the quality of research that can be carried out on Canadian university students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Canada (2003). Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Ottawa: Public Works and Communication Services Canada.
Crawford, S.D., Couper, M.P. & Lamias, M.J. (2001). Web surveys: Perceptions of burden, Social Science Computer Review 19(2), 146–162.
Curtin, R., Presser, S. & Singer, E. (2000). The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer commitment, Public Opinion Quarterly 64, 413–428.
Dey, E.L. (1997). Working with low survey response rates: The efficacy of weighting adjustments, Research in Higher Educationv 38(2), 215–227.
Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: Wiley.
Dillman, D. & Carley-Baxter, L.R. (2000). Structural Determinants of Mail Survey Response Rates over a 12-year Period, 1988–1999. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the section on survey methods, The American Statistical Association, Alexandria.
Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Clarke, M., DiGuiseppi, C., Pratap, S., Wentz, R. & Kwan, I. (2002). Increasing Response Rates to Postal Questionnaires: Systematic Review. British Medical Journal. Retrieved, 2005, from the World Wide Web: http://www.bmj.com
Filion, F.L. (1975). Estimating bias due to nonresponse in mail surveys, Public Opinion Quarterly 39(4), 482–492.
Fox, R.J., Crask, M.R. & Kim, J. (1988). Mail survey response rate: A meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response, Public Opinion Quarterly 52(4), 467–491.
Goyder, J. (1986). Surveys on surveys: Limitations and potentialities, Public Opinion Quarterly 50(1), 27–41.
Goyder, J., Warriner, K. & Miller, S. (2002). Evaluating socio-economic status (SES) bias in survey nonresponse, Journal of Official Statistics 18(1), 1–11.
Groves, R.M. & Couper, M.P. (1996). Contact-level influences on cooperation in face-to-face surveys, Journal of Official Statistics 12(1), 63–83.
Groves, R.M., Singer, E. & Corning, A. (2000). Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation, Public Opinion Quarterly 64, 299–308.
Haggerty, K. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics, Qualitative Sociology 27(4), 391–420.
Humphreys, L. (1970). Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places. Chicago: Aldine.
Hutchinson, J., Tollefson, N. & Wigington, H. (1987). Response bias in college freshman’s response to mail surveys, Research in Higher Education 26(1), 99–106.
Kaldenberg, D.O., Koenig, H.F. & Becker, B.W. (1994). Mail survey response rate patterns in a population of the elderly: Does response deteriorate with age? Public Opinion Quarterly 51(8), 68–76.
Kandel, D. & Raveis, J.L. (1983). Sex differences in the characteristics of members lost to a longitudinal panel: A speculative research note, Public Opinion Quarterly 47(7), 567–575.
Kojetin, B.A., Borgida, E. & Snyder, M. (1993). Survey Topic Involvement and Nonresponse Bias. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the Section on Survey Research Method, Volume II, American Statistical Association.
Kuh, G.D. (2003). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual Framework and Overview of Psychometric Properties. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
Lowe, F. & McCormack, T.C. (1955). Some survey sampling biases, Public Opinion Quarterly 19, 303–325.
Moore, D.L. & Tarnai, J. (2002). Evaluating nonresponse error in mail surveys. In R.M. Groves, D. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge and R.J.A. Little (Eds.), Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley, pp. 197–211.
NCES (2002). National Postsecondary Student Aid Study 1999–2000 (NPSAS:2000), Cati Nonresponse Bias Analysis Report (no. 2002–03). Washington, D. C.: National Center for Education Statistics.
NSSE (2003). The College Student Report: 2003 Overview. Bloomington: University of Indiana.
NSSE (2004). Student Engagement: Pathways to Collegiate Success. Bloomington: University of Indiana.
Olsen, L., Schneiderman, M. & Armstrong, R.V. (1993). Increasing Physician Survey Response Rates without Biasing Survey Results. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Survey Methods Section, The American Statistical Association, Ames.
Pearl, D.K. & Fairley, D. (1985). Testing for the potential for nonresponse bias in sample surveys, Public Opinion Quarterly 49(4), 553–560.
Porter, S.R. & Whitcomb, M.E. (2005). Non-response in student surveys: The role of demographics, engagement, and personality, Research in Higher Education 46(2), 127–152.
Sax, L.J., Gilmartin, S.K. & Bryant, A.N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys, Research in Higher Education 44(4), 409–432.
Singer, E., Hippler, H. & Schwarz, N. (1992). Confidentiality assurances in surveys: Reassurance or threat? International Journal of Public Opinion Research 4, 256–268.
Singer, E., von Thurn, D. & Miller, E.R. (1995). Confidentiality assurances and response: A quantitative review of the experimental literature. Public Opinion Quarterly 59, 66–77.
Singer, E., Groves, R.M. & Corning, A. (1999). Differential incentives: Beliefs about practices, perceptions of equity, and effects on survey participation, Public Opinion Quarterly 63, 251–260.
Singer, E., van Hoewyk, J. & Mather, M.P. (2000). Experiments with incentives in telephone surveys, Public Opinion Quarterly 64, 171–188.
Stinchcombe, A.L., Jones, C. & Sheatsley, P. (1981). Nonresponse bias for attitude questions, Public Opinion Quarterly 45(3), 359–375.
van den Hoonaard, W.C. (Ed.). (2002). Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
van den Hoonaard, W.C. (2005). Towards a More Inclusive and Interdisciplinary Research-Ethics Code: Reform and Development in Canada. Paper presented at the IPSI-2005 Conference, Carcassonne, France.
Van Kenhove, P., Wijnen, K. & De Wulf, K. (2002). The influence of topic involvement on mail-survey response behavior, Psychology and Marketing 19, 293–301.
Voigt, L.F., Koepsell, T.D. & Daling, J.R. (2003). Characteristics of telephone survey respondents according to willingness to participate, American Journal of Epidemiology 157, 66–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grayson, J.P., Myles, R. How research ethics boards are undermining survey research on Canadian university students. J Acad Ethics 2, 293–314 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-005-9005-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-005-9005-x