This study responds to Bay and Greenberg's (Bay, D.D. and Greenberg, R.R. (2001). The relationship of the DIT and behavior: A replication. Issues in Accounting Education 10(3): 367–380) call to investigate alternative psychometric instruments to measure ethical behavior other than the heavily relied upon Defining Issues Test. The Mach IV scale (Christie, 1970) has been cited in more than 500 published psychological studies; however, it has not been used extensively in the accounting ethics research. This study provides some preliminary evidence on the use of the Mach IV scale in an accounting ethics context. Similar to ethics studies in other academic disciplines, results across two dependent measures indicate accounting students high in Machiavellianism are more likely to view questionable ethical behavior as acceptable. The research findings also indicate that the Machiavellian construct appears to be a better predictor of ethical propensities in comparison to the commonly used Defining Issues Test. The paper concludes with a discussion on how these reported research findings impact the accounting profession and accounting education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press.
Armstrong, M. (1987). Moral development and accounting education. Journal of Accounting Education (Spring): 27–43.
Bay, D.D. and Greenberg, R.R. (2001). The relationship of the DIT and behavior: A replication. Issues in Accounting Education 10(3): 367–380.
Blank, M. (1984). Socialization in Public Accounting Firms, Unpublished PhD Dissertation (Pennsylvania State University).
Burton, S.M., Johnston, W. and Wilson, E.J. (1991). An experimental assessment of alternative teaching approaches for introducing business ethics to undergraduate business students. Journal of Business Ethics 10, 507–517.
Cavanaugh, G.F. and Fritzsche, D.J. (1985). Using vignettes in business ethics research. In: Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 279–293.
Christie, R. (1970). Scale Construction. In: R. Christie and F.I. Geis (Eds.), Studies in Machiavellianism, New York: Academic Press.
Cohen, J.R., Pant, L.W. and Sharp, D.J. (1996). Measuring the Ethical Awareness and Ethical Orientation of Canadian Auditors. Behavioral Research in Accounting (Supplement), 98–199.
Corzine, J.B., Buntzman, G.F. and Busch, E.T. (1999). Machiavellianism in U.S. in bankers. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 7(1): 72–83.
Davis, J.R. and Welton, R.E. (1991). Professional ethics: Business students perception. Journal of Business Ethics 10, 451–463.
Gable, M. and Topol, M. (1988). Machiavellianism and the department store executive. Journal of Retailing 64(1): 69–84.
Ghosh, D. and Crain, T.L., (1996). Experimental investigation of ethical standards and perceived probability on intentional noncompliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting 8, 219–242.
Harris, P. (2001). Commentary: Machiavelli, political marketing and reinventing government. European Journal of Marketing 35(9/10), 1136–1154.
Hunt, S.D. and Chonko, L. (1984). Ethical problems of advertising agency executives. Journal of Advertising 16(4), 16–25.
Jeffrey, C. (1993). Ethical development of accounting students, non-accounting business students, and liberal arts students, Issues in Accounting Education 8(1), 86–96.
Jones, G.E. and Kavanagh, M.J. (1996). An experimental examination of the effects of individual and situational factors on unethical behavioral intentions in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 15, 511–523.
Kaciuba, G., Hill, N., and Stevens, K. (1997). Factors that Influence the Moral Reasoning Abilities of Accountants: Implications for Universities and the Profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 16: 1297–1309.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays in Moral Development: The Philosophy of Moral Development. New York: Harper and Row.
May, G. (1936). Twenty-five Years of Accounting Responsibility, 1911–1936, New York: Price Waterhouse, p. 173.
Mautz, R. (1975). The case for professional education in accounting, In: A. Bizzell and K. Larson (Eds.), Schools of Accountancy: A New Look at the Issues, New York: AICPA.
McGhee, W., Shields, M.S. and Birnberg, J.G. (1978). The effects of personality on a subject information processing. The Accounting Review (July), 681–697.
McLean, P.A. and Jones, D.G. (1992). Machiavellianism and business education. Psychological Reports 71, 57–58.
McPhail, K.J. (2001). The other objective of ethics education: Re-humanizing the accounting profession a study of ethics, law, engineering, medicine and accountancy. Journal of Business Ethics 34(314): 273–298.
Moore, S. (1995). Machiavellian characteristics among nurses. Nursing Management 26(5), 58–61.
Ponemon, L. (1992). Ethical reasoning and selection-socialization in accounting. Accounting, Organizations, and Society 17(3/4), 239–258.
Ponemon, L. and Glazer, A. (1990). Accounting education and ethical development: The influence of liberal learning on students and alumni in accounting practice, Issues in Accounting Education 5(2), 195–208.
Rest, J.R., Narvaez, E., Thoma, S.J. and Bebeau, M.J. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology 91(4), 644–659.
Ricks, J. and Fraedrich, J. (1999). The paradox of machiavellianism: Machiavellianism may make for productive sales but poor management reviews. Journal of Business Ethics 20, 197–205.
Scofield, S.B., Phillips, T. and Bailey, C.D. (2004). An empirical reanlaysis of the selection–socialization hypothesis: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(5–6), 543–563.
Shaub, M. (1994). An analysis of the association of traditional demographic variables with the moral reasoning of auditing students and auditors, Journal of Accounting Education, 12, 1–26.
St. Pierre, K., Nelson, E. and Gabbin, A. (1990). A study of the ethical development of accounting majors in relation to other business and nonbusiness disciplines, The Accounting Educators Journal, 23–35.
Teal, E.J. and Carroll, A.B. (1999). Moral reasoning skills: are entrepreneurs different? Journal of Business Ethics 19, 229–240.
About this article
Cite this article
Richmond Pope, K. Measuring the Ethical Propensities of Accounting Students: Mach IV versus DIT. J Acad Ethics 3, 89–111 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-005-9000-2
- Business Ethic
- Accounting Profession
- Accounting Student
- Ethical Choice
- Accounting Ethic