Skip to main content
Log in

One Foot Out of the Nest: How Parents and Friends Influence Social Perceptions in Emerging Adulthood

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attachment theory proposes that representations of attachment figures are transferred between relationships, resulting in stable relational experiences. The current study used a transference paradigm to examine how parental and best friend attachment representations influence perceptions of new relationship partners in emerging adulthood. We discovered that close friendships influenced attachment anxiety and avoidance experienced specifically with friend-like others, while parental relationships affected feelings of anxiety toward a variety of people. Several relationship factors, such as the importance of the friend relationship, moderated the transference process. Our findings suggest that emerging adults’ current relationships have an impact on their reactions toward novel individuals, and emerging adults’ feelings about their existing relationship partners color their future social experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There were no significant demographic differences between those who participated in only one session (n = 40) and those who participated in both sessions (n = 90). A series of one-way ANOVAs was conducted to test for differences in general, friend, and parent avoidance and anxiety between the two groups. This analysis found that friend anxiety differed significantly across the two groups, F(1, 128) = 5.58, p = .02. Tukey’s post hoc comparisons indicate that one-session participants experienced significantly greater friend anxiety (M = 2.99, SD = 1.33) than participants who attended both session (M = 2.48, SD = 1.03). It is possible that greater friend anxiety may have led some participants to drop out of the study. However, participants may have also dropped out due to their not needing credit from the second session of the study.

  2. We found no significant differences in transference results between any of the mixed-sex or same-sex friend pairings. Likewise, there were no differences in how parental anxiety and avoidance transferred based on parent type (mother or father). However, participants who reported that their closest parent was their father (n = 21) felt more anxious toward the friend target (M = −.42, SD = .33), compared to participants who reported that their closest parent was their mother, n = 69; M = −.85, SD = .72, p < .01. Additionally, these participants felt more avoidant toward the friend target (M = −.66), compared to participants who reported their mother as their closest parent, M = −2.39, SD = 1.07, p < .01. These findings may indicate that emerging adults with absent or rejecting mothers are more likely to experience insecurity toward friend-like strangers.

  3. This ECR-R was similar to the relationship-specific ECR-R used in session 1, though the wording was in reference to “this person” instead of to a specific relationship partner.

  4. Though 13 participants mentioned when asked during the debriefing that they noticed the resemblance of the targets to their own friend and parent, we included them in the analyses because there were no significant differences between those that reported suspicion and those that did not in terms of the attachment transference findings.

  5. We also collected measures of global attachment, in addition to relationship-specific attachment. In order to examine how global attachment models influenced the transference process, we conducted a series of hierarchical regression analyses in which we held relationship-specific anxiety/avoidance constant to assess whether global anxiety/avoidance still predicted anxiety/avoidance toward the targets. All results were non-significant, suggesting global attachment models do not significantly influence social evaluations of peer and parent-like individuals in the absence of relationship-specific models.

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. M., & Baum, A. (1994). Transference in interpersonal relations: Inferences and affect based on significant-other representations. Journal of Personality, 62, 459–497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. M., & Berk, M. S. (1998). The social-cognitive model of transference: Experiencing past relationships in the present. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619–645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. M., & Thorpe, J. S. (2009). An if-then theory of personality: Significant others and the relational self. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumbaugh, C. C., & Fraley, R. C. (2006). Transference and attachment: How do attachment patterns get carried forward from one relationship to the next? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 552–560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brumbaugh, C. C., & Fraley, R. C. (2007). Transference of attachment patterns: How important relationships influence feelings toward novel people. Personal Relationships, 14, 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caron, A., Lafontaine, M. F., Bureau, J. F., Levesque, C., & Johnson, S. M. (2012). Comparisons of close relationships: An evaluation of relationship quality and patterns of attachment to parents, friends, and romantic partners in young adults. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 44, 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Andersen, S. M. (2008). Transference and the relational self: Intrapersonal and interpersonal consequences in everyday social life. In J. V. Wood, A. Tesser, & J. G. Holmes (Eds.), The self and relationships (pp. 231–253). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinero, R. E., Conger, R. D., Shaver, P. R., Widaman, K. F., & Larsen-Rife, D. (2008). Influence of family of origin and adult romantic partners on romantic attachment security. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 622–632.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, O. J., & Clark, V. A. (1969). Correlation coefficients measured on the same individuals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, 366–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., & Davis, K. E. (1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults’ close friendships and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item-response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1920). A general introduction to psychoanalysis (J. Riviere, Trans.). New York: Pocket Books.

  • Hamilton, C. E. (2000). Continuity and discontinuity of attachment from infancy through adolescence. Child Development, 71, 690–694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1990). Love and work: An attachment theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 270–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Zeifman, D. (1994). Sex and the psychological tether. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 5, pp. 151–180). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, M. E., & Sirin, S. R. (2006). Parent attachment, self-worth, and depressive symptoms among emerging adults. Journal of Counseling and Development, 84, 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerns, K. A., & Stevens, A. C. (1996). Parent-child attachment in late adolescence: Links to social relations and personality. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25, 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobak, R. R., & Sceery, A. (1988). Attachment in late adolescence: Working models, affect regulation, and representations of self and others. Child Development, 59, 135–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, B., Furman, W., & Mooney, K. S. (2006). Predicting interpersonal competence and self-worth from adolescent relationships and relationship networks: Variable-centered and person-centered perspectives. Journal of Developmental Psychology, 52, 572–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, C., & Hawkins, L. B. (2006). Self-monitoring and close relationships. Journal of Personality, 74, 739–778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markiewicz, D., Lawford, H., Doyle, A. B., & Haggart, N. (2006). Developmental differences in adolescents’ and young adults’ use of mothers, fathers, best friends, and romantic partners to fulfill attachment needs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2002). It’s not just who you’re with, it’s who you are: Personality and relationship experiences across multiple relationships. Journal of Personality, 70, 925–964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samter, W., Whaley, B. B., Mortenson, S. T., & Burleson, B. R. (1997). Ethnicity and emotional support in same-sex friendship: A comparison of Asian-Americans, African-Americans, and Euro-Americans. Personal Relationships, 4, 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saribay, S. A., & Andersen, S. M. (2007). Are past relationships at the heart of attachment dynamics? What love has to do with it. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachner, D. A., Shaver, P. R., & Gillath, O. (2008). Attachment style and long-term singlehood. Personal Relationships, 15, 479–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharf, M., Mayseless, O., & Kivenson-Baron, I. (2004). Adolescents’ attachment representations and developmental tasks in emerging adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 40, 430–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2002). Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment and Human Development, 4, 133–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., Collins, W. A., Trans, S., & Haydon, K. C. (2007). Attachment and the experience and expression of emotions in romantic relationships: A developmental perspective. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 92, 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, E., Merrick, S., Treboux, D., Crowell, J., & Albersheim, L. (2000a). Attachment security in infancy and early adulthood: A twenty-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 71, 684–689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, E., Weinfield, N. S., & Hamilton, C. E. (2000b). The stability of attachment security from infancy to adolescence and early adulthood: General discussion. Child Development, 71, 703–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinfeld, N. S., Sroufe, L. A., & Egulund, B. (2000). Attachment from infancy to early adulthood in a high-risk sample: Continuity, discontinuity, and their correlates. Child Development, 71, 695–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanzina Ahmed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmed, T., Brumbaugh, C.C. One Foot Out of the Nest: How Parents and Friends Influence Social Perceptions in Emerging Adulthood. J Adult Dev 21, 147–158 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-014-9187-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-014-9187-9

Keywords

Navigation