Skip to main content

Personality Preferences and Their Relationship to Ego Development in Australian Leadership Program Participants

Abstract

The growth of adult ego development to post-conventional levels is associated with many adaptive advantages for the individual and society. However, the vast majority of adults across a wide range of samples demonstrate ego stages well below the maximum potential. In an effort to advance understanding of why and how development to higher ego levels might occur for some individuals and not others, we explored whether particular personality preferences and combinations thereof (as measured by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator or MBTI) are associated with higher ego levels and whether particular personality preferences might act as inhibiting or facilitating factors in ego development. Participants were 374 adults (aged 18–61; 50 % female) undertaking 11 community leadership development and 2 professional management development programs. After adjusting for effects of age and education, a preference for Intuition on the MBTI was associated with significantly higher ego development on program entry and with greater ego development during the programs. These results are consistent with previous research and provide support for Manners’ and Durkin’s (Developmental Review, 20:475–513, 2000) proposal that dispositional personality characteristics may enhance or constrain ego development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Barker, E. H., & Torbert, W. R. (2011). Generating and measuring practical differences in leadership performance at postconventional action-logics. In A. H. Pfaffenberger, P. W. Marko, & A. Combs (Eds.), The postconventional personality: Assessing, researching, and theorizing (pp. 39–56). New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bayne, R. (2003). Love, money and studying. The Psychologist, 16, 529–531. Retrieved from http://www.thepsychologist.org.uk/archive/archive_home.cfm/volumeID_16-editionID_99-ArticleID_611-getfile_getPDF/thepsychologist/oct03he.pdf.

  3. Broughton, J. M., & Zahaykevich, M. K. (1998). Ego and ideology: A critical review of Loevinger’s theory. In D. K. Lapsley & F. Clarke Powers (Eds.), Self, ego and identity: Integrative approaches (pp. 45–70). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, B. (2011). An empirical study of sustainability leaders who hold post-conventional consciousness. Integral Thinkers. Retrieved from http://integralthinkers.com/wp-content/uploads/Brown-2011-empirical-study-of-sustainability-leaders.pdf.

  5. Bursik, K. (1991). Adaptation to divorce and ego development in adult women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 300–306. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.300.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bushe, G. R., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). Predicting organisation development consulting competence from the Myers Briggs Type Indicator and stage of ego development. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 26, 337–357. doi:10.1177/0021886390263008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-briggs type indicator score reliability across: Studies a meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 590–602. doi:10.1177/0013164402062004004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clancy, S. G. (1997). STJs and change: Resistance, reaction, or misunderstanding? In C. Fitzgerald & L. Kirby (Eds.), Developing leaders: Research and applications in psychological type and leadership development (pp. 415–438). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohn, L. D. (1991). Sex differences in the course of personality development. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 252–266. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.252.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohn, L.D. (1998). Age trends in personality development: A quantitative review. In: P.M. Westenberg, A Blasi, & L.D. Cohn (Eds.), Personality development: Theoretical, empirical and clinical investigations of Loevinger’s conception of ego development (pp. 133–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  11. Cohn, L. D., & Westenberg, P. M. (2004). Intelligence and maturity: Meta-analytic evidence for the incremental and discriminant validity of Loevinger’s measure of ego development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 760–772. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.760.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cook-Greuter, S. (1999). Postautonomous ego development: A study of its nature and measurement. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (http://search.proquest.com/docview/304503009?accountid=8203).

  13. Cook-Greuter, S. R. (2004). Making the case for a developmental perspective. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36(7), 275–281. doi:10.1108/00197850410563902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cranton, P. (2006). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide for educators of adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dayton, L.S. (1981). The relationship between ego development of mothers and their emotional, social and cognitive support of their children (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (http://search.proquest.com/docview/303160809?accountid=8203).

  16. Donovan, T. (1997). The edge of the possible: Intelligence of a New Era. New South Wales: Business and Professional Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Einstein, D. & Lanning, K. (1998). Shame, guilt, ego development and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 66, 555–582. Retrieved from http://www.wiley.com.proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/WileyCDA/.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Furnham, A. (1996). The big five versus the big four. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 303–307. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(96)00033-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Furnham, A., Moutafi, J., & Crump, J. (2003). The relationship between the revised NEO—personality inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Social Behaviour and Personality, 31, 577–584. doi:10.2224/sbp.2003.31.6.577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gardner, W.L. & Martinko, M.J. (1996). Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to study managers: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(1), 45–83. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com.proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/journal.aspx?pid=10604.

  21. Gast, H.L. (1984). The relationship between stages of ego development and developmental stages of health self care operations (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (http://search.proquest.com/docview/303314612?accountid=8203).

  22. Guerette, R.H. (1986). Environmental Integrity and Corporate Responsibility’. Journal of Business Ethics, 5, 409–415. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com.proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/home/main.mpx.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harrington, R. & Loffredo, D.A. (2001). The relationship between life satisfaction, self-consciousness, and the Myers-Briggs Type Inventory dimensions. The Journal of Psychology, 135(4), 439–450. Retrieved from http://www.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hauser, S. T. (1976). Loevinger’s model and measure of ego development: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 928–955. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.5.928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hogansen, J., & Lanning, K. (2001). Five factors in sentence completion test categories: Toward rapprochement between trait and maturational approaches to personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 449–462. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2001.2331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hy, L. X., & Loevinger, J. (1996). Measuring ego development (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Isachsen, O., & Berens, L. V. (1988). Working together: A personality centered approach to management. Coronado, CA: Neworld Management Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Joiner, B., & Josephs, S. (2007). Leadership agility: Five levels of mastery for anticipating and initiating change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  29. King, P.J. & Roberts, N.C. (1992). An investigation into the personality profile of policy entrepreneurs. Public Productivity & Management Review, XVI(2), 173–190. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/stable/10.2307/3380990.

  30. Kurtz, J. E., & Tiegreen, S. B. (2005). Matters of conscience and conscientiousness: The place of ego development in the five factor model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(3), 312–317. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8503_07.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lambie, G.W. (2007). The contribution of ego development level to burnout for school counsellors: Implications for professional school counselling. Journal of Counselling and Development, 85(1), 82–88. Retrieved from http://www.counseling.org.proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/publications.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lang, R. (1997). Type flexibility in processes of strategic planning and change. In C. Fitzgerald & L. Kirby (Eds.), Developing leaders: Research and applications in psychological type and leadership development (pp. 487–512). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological science in the public interest, 1(2), 27. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.002.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Loevinger, J. (1979). Construct validity of the sentence completion test of ego development. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 281–311. doi:10.1177/014662167900300301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Loevinger, J. (1985). A revision of the sentence completion test for ego development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 420–427. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.420.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Loevinger, J., & Wessler, R. (1970). Measuring ego development (vol 1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Loevinger, J., Wessler, R., & Redmore, C. (1970). Measuring ego development (vol 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  39. MacDonald, D. A., Anderson, P. E., Tsagarakis, C. I., & Holland, C. J. (1994). Examination of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the NEO personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 74, 339–344. doi:10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Manners, J., & Durkin, K. (2000). Processes involved in adult ego development: A conceptual framework. Developmental Review, 20, 475–513. doi:10.1006/drev.2000.0508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Manners, J., & Durkin, K. (2001). A critical review of the validity of ego development theory and its measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(3), 541–567. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7703_12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Manners, J., Durkin, K., & Nesdale, A. (2004). Promoting advanced ego development among adults. Journal of Adult Development, 11(1), 19–27. doi:10.1023/B:JADE.0000012524.32002.8d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Marko, P. W. (2011). Exploring facilitative agents that allow ego development to occur. In A. H. Pfaffenberger, P. W. Marko, & A. Combs (Eds.), The postconventional personality: Assessing, researching, and theorizing (pp. 87–100). New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Marrewijk, M.V. & Were, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 107–119. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com.proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/home/main.mpx.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Maslow, A. H. (1962). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand.

  46. McCauley, C. D., Drath, W. H., Palus, C. J., O’Connor, P. M. G., & Baker, B. A. (2006). The use of constructive developmental theory to advance the understanding of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 634–653. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the Five-Factor Model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–39. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00759.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Merron, K.A. (1985). The relationship between ego development and managerial effectiveness under conditions of high uncertainty (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (http://search.proquest.com/docview/303377696?accountid=8203).

  49. Michaelson, C.B. (1985). An exploratory study of the health belief model and ego development in predicting health related actions in the aged (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (http://search.proquest.com/docview/303314064?accountid=8203).

  50. Morros, M., Pushkar, D., & Reis, M. (1998). A study of current, former, and new elderly volunteers: A comparison of developmental and trait models of personality. Journal of Adult Development, 5(4), 219–230. doi:10.1023/A:1021402325477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Myers, I. Briggs, McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. (2003). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type indicator (3rd ed.). California: CPP Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Novy, D. M., Blumentritt, T. L., Nelson, D. V., & Gaa, A. (1997). The Washington University Sentence Complete Test: Are the two halves alternate forms? Are the female and male forms comparable? Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(3), 616–627. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Novy, D. M., & Francis, D. J. (1992). Psychometric properties of the Washington University Sentence Completion Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1029–1039. doi:10.1177/0013164492052004027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pfaffenberger, A. H. (2005). Optimal adult development: An enquiry into the dynamics of growth. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 46(3), 279–301. doi:10.1177/0022167804274359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 210–220. doi:10.1037/1065-9293.57.3.210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Redmore, C., & Waldman, K. (1975). Reliability of a sentence completion measure of ego development. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, 236–242. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa3903_4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Richmond, S. L. (2008). Introduction to type and leadership. California: CPP Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rooke, D. & Torbert, W.R. (1998). Organisational transformations as a function of CEO’s developmental stage. Organization Development Journal, 16(1), 11–28. Retrieved from http://www.odinstitute.org.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Rooke, D. & Torbert, W.R. (2005). Seven transformations of Leadership. Harvard Business Review (April), 1–12. Retrieved from http://www.newperspectives.com.au/downloads/seven%20transformations%20of%20leadership.pdf.

  60. Rushton, S., Morgan, J., & Richard, M. (2007). Teacher’s Myers-Briggs personality profiles: Identifying effective teacher personality traits. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 432–441. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Schaubhut, N. A., & Thompson, R. C. (2009). MBTI type tables international. California: CPP Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Steckroth, R., Slocum, J.W. & Sims, H.P. (1980). Organisational roles, cognitive roles, and problem-solving styles. Journal of Experiential learning and Simulation, 2, 77–87. Retrieved from http://sbaweb.wayne.edu/~absel/bkl/.%5Cjels%5C2-2a.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Strang, S. E., & Kuhnert, K. W. (2009). Personality and leadership developmental levels as predictors of leader performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 421–433. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Torbert, B., Cook-Greuter, S., Fisher, D., Foldy, E., Gauthier, A., Keeley, J., et al. (2004). Action inquiry: The secret of timely and transforming leadership. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Vaillant, G.E. & McCullough, L. (1987). The Washington University Sentence Completion Test compared with other measures of adult ego development. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1189–1194. Retrieved from http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org.proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/article.aspx?Volume=144&page=1189&journalID=13.

  66. Vincent, N., Ward, L. & Denson, L. (2013). Promoting post-conventional consciousness in adults: Australian community leadership programs. Manuscript in preparation.

  67. Walck, C. L. (1996). Management and leadership. In A. L. Hammer (Ed.), MBTI applications: A decade of research on the Myers Briggs Type Indicator (pp. 55–80). Mountain View, CA: CPP Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Westenberg, P. M., & Block, J. (1993). Ego development and individual differences in personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 792–800. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.792.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wilber, K. (2000). Integral psychology: Consciousness, spirit, psychology, therapy. Boston, Massachusetts: Shambala Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Woodruff, R. G. V., & Clarke, F. M. (1993). Understanding the academic needs of minority students at the University of Hawaii, Manoa. In Psychological Type and Culture-East and West: A Multicultural Research Symposium (pp. 199–205).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wright, T. M., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Personality and unrestricted sexual behaviour: Correlations of sociosexuality in Caucasian and Asian college students. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(2), 166–192. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1997.2177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Zilbermann, K.L. (1984). Ego development and patterns of family interaction (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (http://search.proquest.com/docview/303332743?accountid=8203).

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Neil McAdam for his thoughtful comments on this paper and Mike Morris, Senior Research Scientist, CPP, Inc. for his patient assistance with MBTI data conversion. In addition, we wish to acknowledge helpful comments from two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niki Vincent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vincent, N., Ward, L. & Denson, L. Personality Preferences and Their Relationship to Ego Development in Australian Leadership Program Participants. J Adult Dev 20, 197–211 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-013-9171-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
  • Washington University Sentence Completion Test (WUSCT)
  • Leadership development level
  • Community leadership