Abstract
The objective of this work was to study the development of identity in changing contexts. The site of study was machining work in the automotive industry. Machining is an economically critical activity undergoing rapid technological change, with the changes occurring within the working lives of individuals. The development of individuals was considered within the context of the culturally organized human activities in which they occurred. The informants were skilled machinists working for a major automotive company in the United States. A developmental perspective, based on cultural historical theory, together with C. S. Pierce’s theory of sign generation, provided an explanatory framework for the development of identity as a self-regulatory higher psychological function.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.












References
Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y. M., Johnston, A. I., & McDermott, R. (2006). Identity as a variable. Perspectives on politics, 4(4), 695–711.
Andacht, F., & Michel, M. (2005). A semiotic reflection on self-interpretation and identity. Theory and psychology, 15, 51–75.
Barclay, M. W., & Kee, M. (2001). Toward a semiotic psychotherapy: Semiotics objects and semiotic selves. Theory and Psychology, 11, 671–686.
Bowling, W., & Ewing, W. (Producers), & Hanon, J. (Director). (2005). End of the spear [Motion picture]. Studio City: Every Tribe Entertainment.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chandler, D. (2002). Semiotics: The basics. New York: Routledge.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press.
Engström, Y. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43, 960–974.
Engström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erikson, E. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York: International Universities Press.
Finegold, D. (1994). The decline of the US machine-tool industry and prospects for its sustainable recovery. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
Gose, P. (1989). Labor and the materiality of the sign: Beyond dualist theories of culture. Dialectical Anthropology, 13, 103–121.
Holland, D., & Lachicotte, W. (2007). Vygotsky, mead, and the sociocultural studies of identity. In H. Daniels, J. Wertsch, & M. Cole (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Hungwe, K. N. (2000). Becoming a machinist in a changing industry. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1999, Proquest Digital Dissertations, AAT 9971926.
Kalafsky, R. (2006). Performance and practice: Examining the machine tool industries of Japan and the United States. Tijdsachrift Economische Sociale Geografie, 97(2), 178–194.
Lele, V. P. (2006). Material habits, identity and semiotic. Journal of Social Archeology, 6, 48–70.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
McCarthy, C. (2005). Knowing truth: Pierce’s epistemology in an educational context. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37, 157–176.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Monden, Y. (1994). Toyota production system. New York: Institute of Industrial Engineers.
National Research Council. (1999). The changing nature of work: Implications for occupational analysis. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
Pierce, C. S. (1931). Collected papers of C. S. Pierce. In C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. Burks, (Eds.), (Vols. I–VIII). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Robbins, D. (2003). Vygotsky’s non-classical dialectical metapsychology. Journal of the Theory of Social Psychology, 33, 303–312.
Shaiken, H. (1984). Work transformed. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
Shinde, S., & Leu, M. C. (2004). Unigraphics for engineering design. Missouri: Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Missouri-Rolla.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engström, Y. (2003). Conceptualizing transfer: From standard notions to developmental perspectives. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing (pp. 19–38). New York: Pergamon.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds. & Trans.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wartofsky, M. W. (1979). Models. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Weber, M. (1976). Subjective meaning in the social situation. In L. A. Coser & B. Rosenberg (Eds.), Sociological theory (pp. 209–221). New York: Macmillan.
Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hungwe, K. Identity, Self-Interpretation and Workplace Change: An Investigation of the Work Activity of Machining. J Adult Dev 19, 123–140 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-011-9139-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-011-9139-6
Keywords
- Identity
- Work
- Activity
- Semiotic mediation
- Artifacts self-regulation