Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consider Stages of Development in Preventing Terrorism: Does Government Building Fail and Terrorism Result when Developmental Stages of Governance are Skipped?

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Countries, governments, and cultures must move through each of the stages of human development (Commons et al. (1998). Developmental Review, 8(3), 237–278) sequentially. Each stage must be achieved, and failure to recognize this may be a major contributing factor to the rise of terrorism and crime in a society. For example, in a war-like situation, an occupying country’s attempts to have the conquered country jump developmental stages will fail more often than not, possibly resulting in negative sentiment and terrorist behavior among those in the occupied country. Although the US is great at winning small wars such as those against Afghanistan, Grenada, Haiti, Iraq, and Panama, it fails at making and maintaining peace and, in turn, creating democracies. This article will address the reasons why this may be, and what can be done to improve upon our current “hit or miss” policies. We will address some of the developmental stages of the tasks of governing, and some of the means by which government activities may move up in stage. Finally, we suggest reasons why the US has had its various successes in preventing or reducing terrorism when it helped itself and other countries move up in stage and failures when it did not, and why governments in general should move up to more complex stages to reduce the number of terrorists generated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth, M., Beegle, K., & Nyamete, A. (1995). The impact of female schooling on fertility and contraceptive use. World Bank Living Standards Measurement Study.

  • Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W., Gibbs, J. C., & Broughton, J. M. (1980). The relation of moral judgment stage disparity to developmental effects of peer dialogues. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 26, 341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, T., & Aldaz-Carroll, E. (1999). The intergenerational transmission of poverty: Some causes and policy implications. Conference Proceedings of the Inter-American Development Bank, April 1999, Paris.

  • Commons, M. L., Danaher-Gilpin, D., Miller, P. M., & Goodheart, E. A. (2004). Hierarchical complexity scoring system: How to score anything. Unpublished Scoring Manual Available from Dare Institute, Commons@tiac.net.

  • Commons, M. L., & Richards, F. A. (1984). Applying the general stage model. In M. L. Commons, F. A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.), Beyond formal operations: Vol. 1. Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (pp. 141–157). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons, M. L., & Richards, F. A. (2002). Organizing components into combinations: How stage transition works. Journal of Adult Development, 9(3), 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commons, M. L., Trudeau, E. J., Stein, S. A., Richards, F. A., & Krause, S. R. (1998). The existence of developmental stages as shown by the hierarchical complexity of tasks. Developmental Review, 8(3), 237–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, T. L. (2002). A comparison of three developmental stage scoring systems. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(2), 146–189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, H. (1989). The other path: The invisible revolution in the third world. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emler, N., Renwick, S., & Malone, B. (1983). The relationship between moral reasoning and political orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1073–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K. W., Hand, H. H., & Russell, S. (1984). The development of abstractions in adolescents, adulthood. In M. L. Commons, F. A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.), Beyond formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (pp. 43–73). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. Princeton: Van Norstrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1971). Comments on Beilin’s “The development of physical concepts.” In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 121–128). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1931/1977). Some metamathematical results on completeness and consistency; On formal undefinable propositions of Principal Mathematica and related systems I; On completeness and consistency. In J. Heijehoort (Ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A source book in mathematical logic 1879–1931. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977 (Originally published 1930, 1931, 1931, respectively).

  • Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situations of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1966). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York, NY, US: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutheil, T. G., Commons, M. L., Miller, P. M., & LaLlave, J. (2000). Telling tales out of court: A pilot study of experts’ disclosures about opposing experts. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28, 449–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. T. McCarthy (Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.

  • Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. C. Lenhardt & S. W. Nicholsen (Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. J. (1978, 1979). Limits of scientific inquiry. In G. J. Holton & R. S. Morison (Eds.), The Twentieth-century sciences; studies in the biography of ideas (pp. 382–422). New York: Norton.

  • Jejeebhoy, S. (1996). Women’s education, autonomy, and reproductive behaviour: Experience from developing countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegan, R. (1998). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. (2001). How the way we talk can change the way we work: Seven languages for transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, J. J. (1979). Dictatorships and double standards. Commentary, 34–45. http://www.commentarymagazine.com/cm/6189.pdf? handle=com.commentarymagazine.content.Article::6189

  • Kirkpatrick, J. J. (1982). Establishing a viable human rights policy. In H. J. Wiarda (Ed.), Human rights and U.S. human rights policy. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Psychology and genetic epistemology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development: Moral stages, their nature and validity. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVine, R. A. (1980). Influences of women’s schooling on maternal behavior in the third world. Comparative Education Review, 24(2) 78–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeVine, R. A. (1987). Women’s schooling, patterns of fertility, and child survival. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVine, R. A. (1995). Schooling and survival: The impact of maternal education on health and reproduction. In L. Chen (Ed.), The third world, health and social change in international perspective.

  • LeVine, R. A. F., Uribe, T. M., Correa, C. S., & Miller, P. M. (1991). Women’s schooling and child care in the demographic transition: A Mexican case study. Population and Development Review, 17(3) 459–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, E. G. (2001a). The psychology of humiliation: Summary of results and what the research on humiliation added to pre-existing knowledge. http://www.peace.ca/humiliation.htm

  • Lindner, E. G. (2001b). Humiliation and the human condition: Mapping a minefield. Human Rights Review, 2(2), 46–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B., with Sinclair-de Zwart, H. (1973). Memory and intelligence. (A. Pomerans, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.

  • Plott, C. R. (1967). A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rules. American Economic Review, 57, 787–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C. R. (1971). Recent results in the theory of voting. In M. D. Intrilligator (Ed.), Frontiers of quantitative economics (pp. 109–127). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C. R., & Levine, M. E. (1978). A model of agenda influence on committee decisions. American Economic Review, 68, 146–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, W. C., Chissick, S. S., & Heisenberg, W. (1977). The Uncertainty principle and foundations of quantum mechanics: A fifty years’ survey. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S. W. (1988a). The structure of political thinking. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 539–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S. W. (1988b). Reason, ideology and politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S. W. (2002). The not so common sense: Differences in how people judge social and political life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S. W., Ward, D., & Chilton, S. (1988). Political reasoning and cognition. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. (2002). Adult development through an integral public practice for community work on complex issues. In Personal and interpersonal factors in development poster session, presented at 17th Annual Adult Development Symposium of the Society for Research in Adult Development, June 21–23, New York City.

  • Schultz, T. P. (1991). Returns to women’s education. In E. M. King, & A. M. Hill (Eds.), Women’s education in developing countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnert, G., & Commons, M. L. (1994). Society and the highest stages of moral development. The Individual and Society, 4(1), 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (1986). A critique of past and present theories of political tolerance: Discovering rational, democratic citizens through the application of developmental stages. Political Behavior, 8, 45–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (1990). Rational constraint in mass belief systems: The role of developmental moral stages in the structure of political beliefs. Political Psychology, 11(1), 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich-Haste, H. (1986). Kohlberg’s contribution to political psychology: A positive view. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and controversy (pp. 337–361). Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Lamport Commons.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Commons, M.L., Goodheart, E.A. Consider Stages of Development in Preventing Terrorism: Does Government Building Fail and Terrorism Result when Developmental Stages of Governance are Skipped?. J Adult Dev 14, 91–111 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-007-9016-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-007-9016-5

Keywords

Navigation