Skip to main content

The Development of Scientific Talent in Westinghouse Finalists and Members of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

This paper reports the results of two studies on the development of scientific talent among the scientific elite: finalists in the Westinghouse Science Competition and members of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS). Sampling four cohorts of finalists, we examined whether these gifted teenagers actually do go on to be the best scientists of the next generation by coding education and career outcomes. Finalists were quite successful and stayed mostly within science and medicine for their career choice. A rather high—although marginally unequal—portion of male (91%) and female (74%) finalists earned a doctoral degree. Women were also more likely to change to non-scientific professions than men. Among the most compelling findings from the NAS study were: age that scientific talent was recognized by self and others was an important predictor of early publication, which in turn was an important predictor of lifetime productivity. Growth curve analyses suggested a cubic model best fit productivity data over time. Moreover, in both samples there was an association between scientific achievement and recent immigrant status. Various theoretical models are discussed as possible explanations for the developmental, gender, and immigrant-status findings on scientific talent.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1.

References

  1. Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S., Stone V., Rutherford M. (1999) A mathematician, a physicist, and a computer scientist with Asperger syndrome: Performance on folk psychology and folk physics tests Neurocase 5: 475–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S., Skinner R., Martin J., Clubley E. (2001). The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders 31: 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baron-Cohen S., Bolton P., Wheelwright S., Short L., Mead G., Smith A., Scahill V. (1998) Autism occurs more often in families of physicists, engineers, and mathematicians Autism 2: 296–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bayer A. E., Dutton J. E. (1977) Career age and research–professional activities of academic scientists: Tests of alternative non-linear models and some implications for higher education faculty policies Journal of Higher Education 48: 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benbow C. P., Minor L. L. (1986) Mathematically talents students and achievement in the high school sciences American Educational Research Journal 23: 425–436.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benbow C. P., Stanley J. C. (1982). Consequences in high school and college of sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: A longitudinal perspective American Educational Research Journal 19: 598–622.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Benbow C. P., Lubinski D., Shea D. L., Eftekhari-Sanjani H. E. (2000) Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: Their status 20 years later Psychological Science 11: 474–480.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger J. (1994) The Young Scientists: America’s Future and the Winning of the Westinghouse. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berliner, D. C. (2001). Averages that hide the true extremes. Washington Post, January 28, 2001.

  10. Cameron P. A., Mills C. J., Heinzen T. E. (1995) The social context and developmental patterns of crystallizing experiences among academically talented youth Roeper Review 17: 197–200.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cole J. R. (1987) Women in science. In: Jackson D., Rushton P. J. (Eds) Scientific excellence Beverly Hills, CA: Sage (pp. 359–375).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cole J., Cole S. (1973) Social stratification in science Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cole J. R., Zuckerman H. (1987) Marriage, motherhood, and research performance in science Scientific American 256: 119–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cole S. (1979) Age and scientific performance American Journal of Sociology 84: 958–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dennis W. (1956) Age and productivity among scientists Science 123: 724–725.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dennis W. (1966) Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years Journal of Gerontology 21: 1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Diamond A. M. (1986) The life-cycle research productivity of mathematicians and scientists Journal of Gerontology 41: 520–525.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Farmer H. S., Wardrop J. L., Rotella S. C. (1999). Antecedent factors differentiating women and men in science/nonscience careers Psychology of Women Quarterly 23: 763–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Feist G. J. (1993) A structural model of scientific eminence Psychological Science 4: 366–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feist G. J. (1997) Quantity, impact, and depth of research as influences on scientific eminence: Is quantity most important? Creativity Research Journal 10: 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Feist, G. J. (2006). Foundations for the psychology of science: With a view toward the origins of the scientific mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Feist G. J., Barron F. (2003) Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality Journal of Research in Personality 37: 62–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Feist G. J., Gorman M. E. (1998) Psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline Review of General Psychology 2: 3–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Freeman C. (1999) The crystallizing experience: A study in musical precocity Gifted Child Quarterly 43: 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gardne H. (1993) Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity New York: Basic .

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hedges L. V., Nowell A. (1995) Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals Science, 269, 41–45.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Helson R., Crutchfield R. S. (1970). Mathematicians: The creative researcher and the average PhD Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 34: 250–257.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Holahan C. K., Sears R. R. (1995). The gifted group in later maturity Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hollan J. L. (1992). Making vocational choices (2nd ed.) Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Horner K. L., Rushton J. P., Vernon P.A. (1986) Relation between aging and research productivity of academic psychologists Psychology and Aging 4: 319–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaye, G. T. (2001). Celebrating 60 years of science. Intel Corporation.

  32. Lehman H. C. (1953) Age and achievement Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lehman H. C. (1960) The age decrement in outstanding scientific creativity American Psychologist 15: 128–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lehman H. C. (1966). The psychologist’s most creative years American Psychologist 21: 363–369.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lippa R. (1998). Gender related individual differences and structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people-things dimension Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 996–1009.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Long J. S. (Ed.) (2001) From scarcity to visibility: Gender differences in the careers of doctoral scientists and engineers Washington, DC: National Academy Press .

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lubinski D., Benbow C. P. (1994) The study of mathematically precocious youth: The first three decades of a planned 50-year study of intellectual talent In: Subotnik R. F., Arnold K. D. (Eds). Beyond Terman: Longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent Norwood, NJ: Ablex. (pp. 255–281).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Smith, T. A., Chrastowski, S. J., Garden, R. A., & O’Conner, K. M. (2000). TIMMS 1999 international science report: Findings from IEA’s repeat of the third international mathematics and science study at the 8th grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College. .

  39. Merton R. K. (1973) The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations Chicago: Chicago University Press .

    Google Scholar 

  40. National Science Foundation (1999). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 1998 (NSF 99–87). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

  41. O’Brien V., Martinez-Pons M., Kopala M. (1999). Mathematics self-efficacy, ethnic identity, gender, and career interests related to mathematics and science Journal of Educational Research 92: 231–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Over R. (1982) Is age a good predictor of research productivity? Australian Psychologist 17: 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Over R. (1989) Age and scholarly impact Psychology and Aging 4: 222–225.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Prediger D. J. (1982). Dimensions underlying Holland’s hexagon: Missing link between interests and occupations? Journal of Vocational Behavior 21: 259–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Reis S. M., Park S. (2001). Gender differences in high-achieving students in math and science. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 25: 52–73.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Reskin B. F. (1977) Scientific productivity and the reward structure of science American Sociological Review 42: 491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Roe A. (1965) Changes in scientific activities with age Science 150: 313–318.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rosser, S. (1988) (Ed.) Feminism within the science and healthcare professions: Overcoming resistance. Exeter, England: A. Wheaton & Co.

  49. Seymour E., Hewitt N. M. (1997) Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Simonton D. K. (1988a). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin 104: 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Simonton D. K. (1988b). Scientific genius: A psychology of science Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Simonton D. K. (1990) Psychology, science, and history: A treatise on their convergence New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Simonton D. K. (1991) Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts Developmental Psychology 27: 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Singer J. D., Willett J. (2003) Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence Oxford, England: Oxford University Press .

    Google Scholar 

  55. Subotnik R. F., Steiner C. L. (1994) Adult manifestations of adolescent talent in science: A longitudinal study of 1983 Westinghouse Science Talent Search winners In: Subotnik R. F., Arnold K. D. (eds). Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing (pp. 52–76).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Subotnik R. F., Duschl R. A., Selmon E. H. (1993) Retention and attrition of science talent: A longitudinal study of Westinghouse Science Talent winners International Journal of Science Education 15: 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Terman L. M. (1925) Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Terman L. (1955) Are scientists different? Scientific American 192: 25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. U.S. Census (2002). Table 1. General Demographic Characteristics. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Products/Profiles/Single/2002/ACS/Tabular/010/01000US1.htm. Retrieved January 26, 2004.

  60. Webb R. M., Lubinski D., Benbow C. (2002) Mathematically facile adolescents with math-science aspirations: New perspectives on their educational and vocational development Journal of Educational Psychology 94: 785–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zuckerman H. (1996) Scientific elite (2nd edition). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory J. Feist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feist, G.J. The Development of Scientific Talent in Westinghouse Finalists and Members of the National Academy of Sciences. J Adult Dev 13, 23–35 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-006-9002-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • psychology of science
  • achievement
  • career outcomes
  • gender
  • immigrant status