Skip to main content
Log in

Psychosocial Difficulties Profiles Among Youth with Intellectual Disabilities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study sought to identify the various configurations, or profiles, of internalizing and externalizing behaviors found among a sample of youth with intellectual disabilities (ID). These behaviors were assessed twice over one year, using self, parental, and teacher reports. Six variables were hypothesized to predict profile membership: Parent–child relationship (i.e., warmth and conflict), student–teacher relationship (i.e., warmth and conflict), peer acceptance, and peer victimization. To this end, we conducted Latent Profile Analysis among a sample of 393 youth with ID (aged 11–22 years old) recruited in Canada (French-speaking; n = 142; 49.30% boys) and Australia (English-speaking; n = 251; 67.30% boys). Our results revealed five profiles: (1) Adjusted (13.48%), (2) Mild School-related Difficulties (34.38%), (3) Underestimation of Mild Difficulties (12.40%), (4) High Difficulties (19.45%), and (5) Internalizing Difficulties Unobserved at School (20.19%). These profiles, as well as profile membership, remained stable over time. Lower levels of student–teacher warmth, lower levels of peer acceptance, and higher levels of peer victimization were associated with a higher likelihood of membership into profiles characterized by above-average levels of psychosocial difficulties, especially self-reported. Based on these findings, future interventions addressing internalizing and externalizing behaviors could benefit from focusing on the school environment, notably peer acceptance and student–teacher warmth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Australian Research Council (DP140101559) and from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430–2012-0091, 435–2014-0909). In the preparation of this paper, the last author was also supported by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435–2018-0368).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Elizabeth Olivier: Conceptualization, Methodology, Analytical Support, Writing (original draft, review, editing); Amy Jolin: Conceptualization, Methodology, Analyses, Writing (original draft, review, editing); Céleste Dubé: Conceptualization, Methodology, Analyses, Writing (original draft, review, editing); Christophe Maïano: Funding (both countries), Study Design (both countries), Data Collection (Canada), Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing (original draft, review, editing); Danielle Tracey: Funding (Australia), Study Design (Australia), Data Collection (Australia), Writing (original draft, review, editing); Rhonda G. Craven: Funding (Australia), Study Design (Australia), Data Collection (Australia), Writing (original draft, review, editing); Alexandre J.S. Morin: Funding (both countries), Study Design (both countries), Data Collection (Australia), Conceptualization, Methodology, Analytical Support, Writing (original draft, review, editing).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Olivier.

Ethics declarations

Compliance with Ethical Standards

  • The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

  • The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

  • All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

  • The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article

Research Involving Human Participants or Animals

Authorization to conduct the study was obtained from the research ethics committees of the fourth, fifth, and sixth authors’ institutions.

Informed Consent

All participants and their parents provided voluntary and informed consent following procedures outlined in the Method section.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 109 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olivier, E., Jolin, A., Dubé, C. et al. Psychosocial Difficulties Profiles Among Youth with Intellectual Disabilities. J Autism Dev Disord (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06359-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06359-6

Keywords

Navigation