Skip to main content
Log in

Factorial Validity of the Theory of Mind Inventory-2 in Typically Developing Children

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Theory of Mind Inventory-2 (ToMI-2) is a promising measure for assessing theory of mind (ToM) and social-related functions. However, limited evidence on its factorial validity hampers score interpretation. To examine the factorial validity, confirmatory factor analysis for two currently-available structures was performed in 420 typically developing children aged three to seven years. One, the development-based structure, contains three stages of ToM development: the early, basic, and advanced ToM stages. The other, the social-related structure, comprises three social-related ToM functions: emotion recognition, mental state term comprehension, and pragmatics. The results showed that these structures and the unidimensionality of each domain were not supported even after modifications. Thus, further revisions and examinations of the underlying structures of the ToMI-2 are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adolphs, R. (2001). The neurobiology of social cognition. Current Opinion Neurobiology, 11(2), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00202-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (2005). EQS 6.1 for windows. Multivariate Software INC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma, A. (1982). The robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in Lisrel maximum-likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 50(2), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf02294248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavadel, E. W., & Frye, D. A. (2017). Not just numeracy and literacy: Theory of mind development and school readiness among low-income children. Developmental Psychology, 53(12), 2290–2303. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. H., & Chen, H. Y. (2013). Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence-fourth edition: Chinese version manual. Chinese Behavioral Science Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. Y., Keith, T. Z., Chen, Y. H., & Chang, B. S. (2009). What does the WISC-IV measure? Validation of the scoring and CHC-based interpretative approaches. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 54(3), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201507.4002004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C. Y., Huang, C. Y., Huang, Y. J., Lin, G. H., Huang, S. L., Lee, S. C., & Hsieh, C. L. (2017). Comparison of construct validity of two short forms of stroke-specific quality of life scale. PLoS ONE, 12(12), e0188478. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2016). Measuring theory of mind across middle childhood: Reliability and validity of the silent films and strange stories tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. F., Penn, D. L., Bentall, R., Carpenter, W. T., Gaebel, W., Gur, R. C., Kring, M., Park, S., Silverstein, S. M., & Heinssen, R. (2008). Social cognition in schizophrenia: An NIMH workshop on definitions, assessment, and research opportunities. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34(6), 1211–1220. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbm145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol 7). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsueh, I. P., Jeng, J. S., Lee, Y., Sheu, C. F., & Hsieh, C. L. (2011). Construct validity of the stroke-specific quality of life questionnaire in ischemic stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(7), 1113–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, T. L., Prelock, P. A., & Bonazinga, L. (2012). Psychometric evaluation of the theory of mind inventory (ToMI): A study of typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(3), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1244-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, T. L., Prelock, P. A., & Bouyea, L. B. (2014). Technical manual for the theory of mind inventory-2. http://www.theoryofmindinventory.com/task-battery. Accessed 17 May 2014.

  • Hutchins, T. L., Prelock, P. A., Morris, H., Benner, J., LaVigne, T., & Hoza, B. (2016). Explicit vs. applied theory of mind competence: A comparison of typically developing males, males with ASD, and males with ADHD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 21, 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2015.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, D. R. (2016). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Theory of Mind Inventory-2 (ToMI-2) for children with autism spectrum disorders. (Unpublished master's thesis), National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

  • Jinn, J. H. (2011). SPSS for windows (version 20) [Computer software]. IBM Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. R. G., Simonoff, E., Baird, G., Pickles, A., Marsden, A. J. S., Tregay, J., Happé, F., & Charman, T. (2018). The association between theory of mind, executive function, and the symptoms of autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 11(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. C., Lin, C. H., Tsai, C. H., Li, H. J., Lin, S. K., & Chen, K. L. (2019). Association between executing theory of mind in a limited experimental context and executing it in daily contexts in children with autism spectrum disorder: A cross-sectional study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(3), 7303205150p7303205151–7303205150p7303205111. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.031773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. C., Tsai, C. H., Lin, Y. C., Li, H. J., Jiang, D. R., Fu, I. N., & Chen, K. L. (2021). Factorial validity of the theory of mind inventory-2 in children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Ramayah, T., Chuah, F., & Cheah, J. (2017). A review of the methodological misconceptions and guidelines related to the application of structural equation modeling: A Malaysian scenario. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 1(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory–third edition. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. C., & Wellman, H. M. (2019). Longitudinal theory of mind (ToM) development from preschool to adolescence with and without ToM delay. Child Development, 90(6), 1917–1934. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preckel, K., Kanske, P., & Singer, T. (2018). On the interaction of social affect and cognition: Empathy, compassion and theory of mind. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reniers, R. L., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N. M., & Vollm, B. A. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.528484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.3200/Joer.99.6.323-338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. P. (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, V. E., & Gerrans, P. (2006). What’s domain-specific about theory of mind? Social Neuroscience, 1(3–4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910601029221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, M. A., Weaverdyck, M. E., Mildner, J. N., & Tamir, D. I. (2019). People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others. Nature Communications, 10(1), 2117. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10083-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2012). Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence—fourth edition. The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, P., & Henning, K. (2013). Texts in statistical science: Understanding advanced statistical methods: Boca Raton. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 110-2628-B-006-031, MOST 109-2628-B-006-023, and MOST 109-2811-B-006-517).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Shih-Chieh Lee and Kuan-Lin Chen designed the study and wrote the study protocol. I-Ning Fu, Meng-Ru Liu, and Kuan-Lin Chen conducted the data collection. Shih-Chieh Lee performed the data analysis and wrote the first draft of this manuscript. I-Ning Fu, Meng-Ru Liu, Tzu-Ying Yu, and Kuan-Lin Chen provided substantial comments and edited the draft to achieve the final manuscript. All authors contributed to the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuan-Lin Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

This manuscript has been read and approved by all authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was provided by the caregivers of all participating children. The authors certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1 Brief Description and Domain Structures of the ToMI-2 Items

Appendix 1 Brief Description and Domain Structures of the ToMI-2 Items

No

Brief description of the item

Developmental-based

structure

Social-related

structure

3

Early empathy

Early

Not included

6

Discrimination of basic emotions

Early

ER

24

Intentionality

Early

Not included

25

Basic positive emotion recognition (happy)

Early

ER

28

Social referencing: reading fear

Early

Not included

37

Sharing attention: initiating

Early

Not included

38

Sharing attention: responding

Early

Not included

43

Gaze following

Early

Not included

44

Social referencing: ambiguous situation

Early

Not included

48

Basic negative emotion recognition (sad)

Early

ER

49

Basic negative emotion recognition (mad)

Early

ER

50

Basic negative emotion recognition (scared)

Early

ER

54

Mental state term comprehension: early desire (want)

Early

MSC

1

Physiologically-based behavior

Basic

Not included

4

Emotion-based behavior

Basic

Not included

7

Mental state term comprehension: cognitive terms (think)

Basic

MSC

8

False beliefs: unexpected location

Basic

Not included

9

Seeing leads to knowing

Basic

Not included

10

Mental state term comprehension: cognitive terms (know)

Basic

MSC

11

Appearance-reality distinction

Basic

Not included

12

False beliefs: unexpected contents

Basic

Not included

15

Certainty

Basic

Not included

16

Mental-physical distinction

Basic

Not included

26

Pretense: engaging in pretense

Basic

Not included

29

Counterfactual reasoning

Basic

Not included

30

Pretense: understanding pretense in others

Basic

Not included

31

Child’s ability to deceive

Basic

Not included

32

Cognitive emotion recognition (disgust)

Basic

ER

33

Speech acts: performatives (promises)

Basic

MSC

35

Pragmatics: secrets

Basic

PRAG

39

Mental state term comprehension: cognitive terms (belief)

Basic

MSC

42

Attribute-based behavior

Basic

Not included

51

Cognitive emotion recognition (surprise)

Basic

ER

53

Mental state term comprehension: desire (need)

Basic

MSC

57

Future thinking (self)

Basic

Not included

2

Pragmatics: sarcasm

Advanced

PRAG

5

Second-order false desire attribution

Advanced

Not included

13

Pragmatics: idiomatic language

Advanced

PRAG

14

Pragmatics: deception by others

Advanced

PRAG

17

Emotion recognition: display rules

Advanced

ER

18

Pragmatics: complex social judgment

Advanced

PRAG

19

Pragmatics: white lies

Advanced

PRAG

20

Pragmatics: lies versus jokes

Advanced

PRAG

21

Visual perspective-taking (level 2)

Advanced

Not included

22

Second-order understanding of belief

Advanced

Not included

23

Second-order understanding of emotion

Advanced

Not included

27

Complex social judgment

Advanced

Not included

34

Empathy

Advanced

Not included

36

Pragmatics: humor (play on words)

Advanced

PRAG

40

Mind as active interpreter: biased cognition

Advanced

Not included

41

Mind as active interpreter: ambiguous figure perception

Advanced

Not included

45

Pragmatics: audience adaptation

Advanced

PRAG

46

Conflicting emotions

Advanced

Not included

47

Folk (commonsense) psychology

Advanced

Not included

52

Complex emotion recognition (embarrassed)

Advanced

ER

55

Complex emotion recognition (guilt)

Advanced

ER

56

Autonoetic (self-knowing) awareness

Advanced

Not included

58

Mental state inference in context

Advanced

Not included

  1. Only some of the items were included in the social-related structure. Those not included are marked “Not included”
  2. ER emotion recognition, MSC mental state term comprehension, PRAG pragmatics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, SC., Fu, IN., Liu, MR. et al. Factorial Validity of the Theory of Mind Inventory-2 in Typically Developing Children. J Autism Dev Disord 53, 310–318 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05426-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05426-0

Keywords

Navigation