A plethora of neuroimaging studies have focused on the discovery of potential neuroendophenotypes useful to understand the etiopathogenesis of autism and predict treatment response. Social robotics has recently been proposed as an effective tool to strengthen the current treatments in children with autism. However, the high clinical heterogeneity characterizing this disorder might interfere with behavioral effects. Neuroimaging is set to overcome these limitations by capturing the level of heterogeneity. Here, we provide a preliminary evaluation of the neural basis of social robotics and how extracting neural hallmarks useful to design more effective behavioral applications. Despite the endophenotype-oriented neuroimaging research approach is in its relative infancy, this preliminary evidence encourages innovation to address its current limitations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
American Psychological Association. (2017). APA Policy: Applied behavior analysis. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/applied-behavior-analysis.aspx
Anzalone, S., Tanet, A., Pallanca, O., Cohen, D., Chetouani, M. (2019). A humanoid robot controlled by neurofeedback to reinforce attention in autism spectrum disorder. Proceedings of the 3rd Italian Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Bari, Italy.
Chaminade, T., Da Fonsecam D., Rosset, D., Lutcher, E., Cheng, G., Deruelle, C. (2012). FMRI study of young adults with autism interacting with a humanoid robot, in Procedings of the 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, (Paris: IEEE). 380–385.
David, N., Schneider, T. R., Peiker, I., Al-Jawahiri, R., Engel, A. K., & Milne, E. (2016). Variability of cortical oscillation patterns: A possible endophenotype in autism spectrum disorders? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 590–600.
Devlin, B., & Scherer, S. W. (2012). Genetic architecture in autism spectrum disorder. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 22(3), 229–37.
Ecker, C. C., & Murphy, D. D. (2014). Neuroimaging in autism-from basic science to translational research. Nature Reviews Neurology, 10(2), 82–91.
Fedotchev, A. I., Dvoryaninova, V. V., Velikova, S. D., & Zemlyanaya., (2019). Modern technologies in studying the mechanisms, diagnostics, and treatment of autism spectrum disorders. SovremennyeTehnologii v Medicine, 11(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2019.11.1.03.
Geschwind, D. H., & Levitt, P. (2007). Autism spectrum disorders: Developmental disconnection syndromes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(1), 103–111.
Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D. (2003). The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions. Am J Psychiatry, 160(4), 636–45.
Gottesman, I. I., & Shields, J. J. (1967). A polygenic theory of schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 58(1), 199–205.
Goulart, C., Valadão, C., Caldeira, E., & Bastos, T. (2019). Brain signal evaluation of children with autism spectrum disorder in the interaction with a social robot. Biotechnology Research and Innovation, 3, 60–68.
Grelotti, D. J., Klin, A. J., Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Cohen, D. J., Gore, J. C., et al. (2005). fMRI activation of the fusiform gyrus and amygdala to cartoon characters but not to faces in a boy with autism. Neuropsychologia, 43(3), 373–85.
Jung, C. E., Strother, L., Feil-Seifer, D. J., & Hutsler, J. J. (2016). Atypical asymmetry for processing human and robot faces in autism revealed by fNIRS. PLoS One, 11(7), e0158804. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158804.
Kim, E. S., Berkovits, L. D., Bernier, E. P., Leyzberg, D., Shic, F., Paul, R., et al. (2013). Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1038–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1645-2.
Lai, M. C., Lombardo, M. V., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2014). Autism. Lancet, 383(9920), 896–910.
Langdell, T. (1978). Recognition of faces: An approach for the study of autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 19, 255–268.
Lau, W. K. W., Leung, M. K., & Lau, B. W. M. (2019). Resting-state abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. Sci Rep, 9(1), 3892.
Maenner, M. J., Shaw, K. A., Baio, J., Washington, A., Patrick, M., DiRienzo, M., et al. (2020). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2016. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 69(4), 1–12.
Maglione, M. A., Gans, D., Das, L., Timbie, J., & Kasari, C. (2012). Nonmedical interventions for children with ASD: Recommended guidelines and further research needs. Pediatrics, 130(Suppl 2), S169–S178.
Mahajan, R., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2015). Neuroimaging endophenotypes in autism spectrum disorder. CNS Spectrums, 20(4), 412–26.
Marino, F., Chilà, P., Sfrazzetto, S. T., Carrozza, C., Crimi, I., Failla, C., et al. (2019). Outcomes of a robot-assisted social-emotional understanding intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03953-x.
Masi, A., DeMayo, M. M., Glozier, N., & Guastella, A. J. (2017). An overview of autism spectrum disorder, heterogeneity and treatment options. Neuroscience Bulletin, 33(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-017-0100-y.
Pennisi, P., Tonacci, A., Tartarisco, G., Billeci, L., Ruta, L., Gangemi, S., et al. (2016). Autism and social robotics: A systematic review. Autism Research, 9(2), 165–83.
Peters, J. M., Taquet, M., Vega, C., Jeste, S. S., Fernández, I. S., Tan, J., et al. (2013). Brain functional networks in syndromic and non-syndromic autism: a graph theoretical study of EEG connectivity. BMC Medicine, 11, 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-54.
Ruparelia, K., Manji, K., Abubakar, A., & Newton, C. R. (2017). Investigating the evidence of behavioral, cognitive, and psychiatric endophenotypes in autism: A systematic review. Autism Research and Treatment, 2017, 6346912. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6346912.
Ruta, L., Marino, F., Cerasa, A., Pioggia, G. (2020). Robot-assisted social-emotional understanding intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders, Springer Editor, II Ed. ISBN: 978-3-319-91279-0. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-8_102457-1
Saadatzi, M. N., Pennington, R. C., Welch, K. C., & Graham, J. H. (2018). Small-group technology-assisted instruction: Virtual teacher and robot peer for individuals with autism spectrum dis- order. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(11), 3816–3830.
Sartorato, F., Przybylowski, L., & Sarko, D. K. (2017). Improving therapeutic outcomes in autism spectrum disorders: Enhancing social communication and sensory processing through the use of interactive robots. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 9, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.02.00.
Schifter, T., Hoffman, J. M., Hatten, H. P., Jr., Hanson, M. W., Coleman, R. E., & DeLong, G. R. (1994). Neuroimaging in infantile autism. Journal of Child Neurology, 9(2), 155–61.
Schultz, R. T., Grelotti, D. J., Klin, A., Kleinman, J., Van der Gaag, C., Marois, R., et al. (2003). The role of the fusiform face area in social cognition: implications for the pathobiology of autism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Science, 358(1430), 415–27.
Stoner, R. R., Chow, M. L. M., Boyle, M. P. M., et al. (2014). Patches of disorganization in the neocortex of children with autism. The New England Journal of Medicine, 370(13), 1209–19.
Traut, N., Beggiato, A., Bourgeron, T., Delorme, R., Rondi-Reig, L., Paradis, A. L., et al. (2018). Cerebellar volume in autism: Literature meta-analysis and analysis of the autism brain imaging data exchange cohort. Biological Psychiatry, 83(7), 579–588.
van den Berk-Smeekens, I., van Dongen-Boomsma, M., De Korte, M.W.P., Den Boer, J.C., Oosterling, I.J., Peters-Scheffer, N.C., et al. (2020) Adherence and acceptability of a robot-assisted pivotal response treatment protocol for children with autism spectrum disorder 10(1), 8110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65048-3.
Virués-Ortega, J. (2010). Applied behavior analytic intervention for autism in early childhood: meta-analysis, meta-regression and dose-response meta-analysis of multiple outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(4), 387–99.
Yun, S. S., Choi, J., Park, S. K., Bong, G. Y., & Yoo, H. (2017). Social skills training for children with autism spectrum disorder using a robotic behavioral intervention system. Autism Research, 10(7), 1306–1323.
Authors have no funding to declare.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Cerasa, A., Ruta, L., Marino, F. et al. Brief Report: Neuroimaging Endophenotypes of Social Robotic Applications in Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 51, 2538–2542 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04708-9
- Autism spectrum disorder
- Social robot