Abstract
Services for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their families have evolved with the advent of the Medicaid waiver, leading to more family-based coordination of care. Evaluating family involvement, the current investigation compared 230 families of children with ASD receiving Medicaid waiver services to a propensity-score matched group of 230 families who were waiting for such services (i.e., registry families). Compared to the registry, waiver families reported more involvement in service planning tasks, but not activities related to future-planning, managing crisis situations, or searching for and securing funding. Additional analyses characterize waiver families as engaging in high levels of coordinating and delivering behavioral interventions for their child. Implications for family burden and future programming for waiver programs are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Waiver eligibility requires at least 15 h per week of special education or similar service. Thus, some families on the waiver may report fewer than 15 h per week of special education services.
References
Caldwell, J., Heller, T., & Taylor, S. J. (2007). Longitudinal outcomes of a consumer-directed program supporting adults with developmental disabilities and their families. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45 (3), 161–173.
DePape, A.-M., & Lindsay, S. (2015). Parents’ experiences of caring for a child with autism spectrum disorder. Qualitative Health Research, 25 (4), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314552455.
Eskow, K. G., Chasson, G. S., & Summers, J. A. (2015). A cross-sectional cohort study of a large, statewide Medicaid home and community-based services autism waiver program. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45 (3), 626–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2217-4.
Eskow, K. G., Chasson, G. S., & Summers, J. A. (2019). The role of choice and control in the impact of autism waiver services on family quality of life and child progress. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49 (5), 2035–2048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03886-5.
Eskow, K., Pineles, L., & Summers, J. A. (2011). Exploring the effect of autism waiver services on family outcomes. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 8 (1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2011.00284.x.
Heller, T., Miller, A. B., & Hsieh, K. (1999). Impact of a consumer-directed family support program on adults with developmental disabilities and their family caregivers. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 48 (4), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.2307/585250.
Lopez, K., Magaña, S., Xu, Y., & Guzman, J. (2018). Mother’s reaction to autism diagnosis: A qualitative analysis comparing Latino and White parents. Journal of Rehabilitation, 84 (1), 41–50.
Merryman, M. B., Miller, N. A., Shockley, E., Eskow, K. G., & Chasson, G. S. (2015). State adoption of Medicaid 1915 (c) waivers for children and youth with autism spectrum disorder. Disability and Health Journal, 8 (3), 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.03.003.
Miller, N. A., Merryman, M. B., Eskow, K. G., & Chasson, G. S. (2016). State design and use of Medicaid 1915 (c) waivers and related benefits to provide services to children and youth with autism spectrum disorder. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121 (4), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-121.4.295.
Neely-Barnes, S., Graff, J. C., Marcenko, M., & Weber, L. (2008). “Family decision making: Benefits to persons with developmental disabilities and their family members”: Erratum. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46 (3), ii–ii. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556(2008)46[ii:E3]2.0.CO;2.
Postorino, V., Sharp, W. G., McCracken, C. E., Bearss, K., Burrell, T. L., Evans, A. N., et al. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of parent training for disruptive behavior in children with autism spectrum disorder. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 20 (4), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-017-0237-2.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70 (1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2335942.
Strauss, K., Mancini, F., SPC Group, & Fava, L. (2013). Parent inclusion in early intensive behavior interventions for young children with ASD: A synthesis of meta-analyses from 2009 to 2011. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34 (9), 2967–2985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.007.
Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science: A Review Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 25 (1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313.
Timberlake, M. T., Leutz, W. N., Warfield, M. E., & Chiri, G. (2014). “In the driver’s seat”: Parent perceptions of choice in a participant-directed medicaid waiver program for young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44 (4), 903–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1942-4.
Vohra, R., Madhavan, S., & Sambamoorthi, U. (2016). Emergency department use among adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46 (4), 1441–1454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2692-2.
Vohra, R., Madhavan, S., Sambamoorthi, U., & St Peter, C. (2014). Access to services, quality of care, and family impact for children with autism, other developmental disabilities, and other mental health conditions. Autism : The International Journal of Research and Practice, 18 (7), 815–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361313512902.
Warfield, M. E., Chiri, G., Leutz, W. N., & Timberlake, M. (2014). Family well-being in a participant-directed autism waiver program: The role of relational coordination. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR, 58 (12), 1091–1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12102.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to recognize the Maryland State Department of Education for their ongoing support of this project through grant funding and extensive collaboration. We are grateful to the families who have given so generously of their time to assist us with this project.
Funding
The contents of this article were developed under a grant funded by a grant from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), Number H133G12003. Note: The findings/opinions of this paper are not necessarily the views of MSDE and do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed in a significant way to the manuscript and all authors have read and approved of the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
I. Care Coordination Items
Frequent Activities: In a typical week during the school year, how many hours do you spend:
Anchors: Don’t Know, Less than 1 h/week, 1–2 h/week, 2–4 h/week, 4–8 h/week, More than 8 h/week.
-
1.
Scheduling providers for your childa
-
2.
Talking about your child's progress with professionals who currently work with him/hera
-
3.
Managing problems or issues that arise with professionals or agencies who work with your child and/or familya
-
4.
Dealing with crises or challengesb
Occasional Activities: During the past 6 months, how often did you work on the following tasks:
Anchors: Don’t Know, Not at All, 1-8x/year, 1-2x/month, 1-2x/week, 3-4x/week, 6-7x/week.
-
5.
Using the internet or other resources to look for services that may help meet the needs of your childb
-
6.
Calling or emailing agencies to find services that may help meet the needs of your childb
-
7.
Fighting for servicesb
-
8.
Making plans for your child for the current yeara
-
9.
Making plans for your child for the next yeara
-
10.
Planning for your child's future for the next 5 years (if your child is age 15 or younger)a
-
11.
Planning for your child's future after he/she is 21 years olda
-
12.
Searching for grants or programs for which your child may be eligibleb
-
13.
Searching for ways to help pay for the services that your child needs (for example, investigating SSI, grants or LISS)b
aCurrent Service Tasks Item Subset.*
bCrisis and Funding Tasks Item Subset.*
*We have added subset labels here to facilitate interpretation of the manuscript. These are not intended to be subscales. They are rationally-derived and not necessarily empirically supported.
II. Behavioral Intervention Involvement Items
During the past 6 months, how often …
Anchors: Don’t Know, Not at All, 1-8x/year, 1-2x/month, 1-2x/week, 3-4x/week, 6-7x/week.
-
1.
Did. you personally provide formal behavioral intervention that you have been formally trained to deliver
-
2.
Did you create the plan for your child's behavioral intervention services
-
3.
Did you train staff or others to provide your child's behavioral interventions
-
4.
Did you monitor the quality of your child's behavioral intervention services
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chasson, G.S., Eskow, K.G., Summers, J.A. et al. Characterization of Family-Directed Care Coordination and Involvement in Behavioral Treatments in an Autism-Specific Medicaid Waiver. J Autism Dev Disord 51, 715–724 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04583-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04583-4