Abstract
Speech-language pathology and special education graduate student teams participated in an intensive summer practicum for social communication skills with children with autism spectrum disorders, utilizing a transdisciplinary approach that aligned to the frameworks utilized for implementation science. Questionnaires measuring transdisciplinary approach knowledge and comfort level were administered pre/post-practicum. Results of the questionnaires, written daily team reflections, course evaluations, and a focus group interview indicated an increase in all measures, including an increased knowledge of TA, increased understanding and comfort level with the other discipline, and a higher level of confidence and openness in working collaboratively utilizing a transdisciplinary approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2017). SLP health care survey 2017. Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/2017-SLP-Health-Care-Survey-Caseload-Characteristics.pdf.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2018). Schools survey report: SLP caseload characteristics trends 2000–2018. Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/2018-Schools-Survey-Caseload-Trends.pdf.
Barnhill, G., Polloway, E., & Sumutka, B. (2011). A survey of personnel preparation practices in autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26(2), 75–86.
Bauer, M. S., Damschroder, L., Hagedorn, H., Smith, J., & Kilbourne, A. M. (2015). An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychology, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40359-015-0089-9.
Berninger, V. W. (2015). Using the interdisciplinary frameworks in practice. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), Interdisciplinary frameworks for schools: Best professional practices for serving the needs of all students (pp. 17–47). Washington DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14437-002.
Carpenter, S. L., King-Sears, M. E., & Keys, S. G. (1998). Counselors + educators + families as a transdisciplinary team = more effective inclusion for students with disabilities. Professional School Counseling, 2(1), 1–9.
Casanova, M. (2014). Autism as a sequence: From heterochronic germinal cell divisions to abnormalities of cell migration and cortical dysplasias. Medical Hypotheses, 83(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2014.04.014.
Cascella, P. W., & Colella, C. S. (2004). Knowledge of autism spectrum disorders among Connecticut school speech-language pathologists. Focus on Autism and Other Development Disabilities, 19(4), 245–252.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Autism. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html.
Chapman, L., & Ware, J. (1999). Challenging traditional roles and perceptions: Using a transdisciplinary approach in an inclusive mainstream school. Support for Learning, 14(3), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.00113.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
Choi, B. C. K., & Pak, B. C. K. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29, 351–364.
Coates, M., Lamb, J., Bartlett, B., & Datta, P. (2017). Autism Spectrum Disorder coursework for teachers and teacher-aides: An investigation of courses offered in Queensland. Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(11), 65–80.
Connecticut State Department of Education. (2005). Guidelines for identification and education of children and youth with autism. Division of Teaching and Learning Programs and Services, Bureau of Special Education (Eds.). Hartford, CT.
D’Amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M., San Martin Rodriguez, L., & Beaulieu, M. (2005). The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(S1), 116–131.
Davies, S. (2007). Team around the child. Working together in early childhood education. Wagga Wagga, New South Wales: Kurrajong Early Intervention Service.
Douglas, N., & Burshnic, V. (2019). Implementation science: Tackling the research to practice gap in communication sciences and disorders. Perspectives of the ASHS Special Interest Group, 4(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_PERS-ST-2018-0000.
Downing, J., & Bailey, B. R. (1990). Sharing the responsibility: Using a transdisciplinary team approach to enhance the learning of students with severe disabilities. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 1(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532768xjepc0103_4.
Ebersöhn, L., Ferreira-Prévost, J., Maree, J., & Daleen, A. (2007). Exploring facilitation skills in transdisciplinary teamwork. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 13(4), 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2007.9747980.
Eren, R. B., & Brucker, P. O. (2011). Practicing evidence-based practices. In B. Reichow, P. Doehring, D. V. Cicchetti, & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Evidence-based practices and treatments for children with autism (pp. 309–341). New York, NY: Springer.
Fewell, R. R. (1983). The team approach to infant education. In S. G. Garwood & R. R. Fewell (Eds.), Educating handicapped infants: Issues in development and intervention (pp. 299–322). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
Foley, G. M. (1990). Portrait of the arena evaluation: Assessment in the transdisciplinary approach. In E. Biggs & D. Teti (Eds.), Interdisciplinary assessment of infants: A guide for early intervention professionals (pp. 271–286). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Giangreco, M. F. (2000). Related services research for students with low-incidence disabilities: Implications for speech-language pathologists in inclusive classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(3), 230–239.
Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 641–653.
Havnes, A. (2009). Talk, planning and decision-making in interdisciplinary teacher teams: A case study. Teachers and Teaching, 15(1), 155–176.
Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J., & Doering, K. (2003). Collaborative teaming to support students at risk and students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 69(3), 315–332.
Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J., Muller, E., & Goetz, L. (2002). Collaborative teaming to support students with augmentative and alternative communication needs in general education classrooms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 20–35.
Johnson, P., Porter, K., & McPherson, I. (2012). Autism knowledge among pre-service teachers specialized in children birth through age five. American Journal of Health Education, 43(5), 279–287.
Kaczmarek, L., Pennington, R., & Goldstein, H. (2000). Transdisciplinary consultation: A center-based team functioning model. Education and Treatment of Children, 22(2), 156–172.
King, G., Strachan, D., Tucker, M., Duwyn, B., Desserud, S., & Shillington, M. (2009). The application of a transdisciplinary model for early intervention services. Infants & Young Children, 22(3), 211–223.
Klin, A., Saulnier, C., Tsatsanis, K., & Volkmar, F. R. (2005). Clinical evaluation in autism spectrum disorders: Psychological assessment within a transdisciplinary framework. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 772–798). Hobokin, NJ: Wiley.
Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (2012). The PRT pocket guide: Pivotal response treatment for Autism Spectrum Disorders. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Lau, H. (2017). Evaluation of a home-based, transdisciplinary intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Hong Kong, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Lethard, A. (1994). Going interprofessional: Working together for health and welfare. London: Routledge.
Limbrick, P. (2007). Team around the child: Principles and practice. In P. Limbrick (Ed.), Family-centered support for children with disabilities and special needs: A collection of essays (pp. 1–9). UK: Interconnections.
López-Huertas, M. (2013). Reflections on multidimensional knowledge: Its influence on the foundation of knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 40(6), 400–407.
McGonigel, M. J., Woodruff, G., & Roszmann-Millican, M. (1994). The transdisciplinary team: A model for family-centered early intervention. Meeting early intervention challenges: Issues from birth to three (2nd ed., pp. 95–131). Paul H. Brookes: Baltimore, MD.
McSheehan, M., Sonnenmeier, R., & Jorgensen, C. (2008). Membership, participation and learning in general education classrooms for students with Autism Spectrum Disorders who use AAC. In P. Mirenda & T. Iacono (Eds.), Autism Spectrum Disorders and AAC (pp. 413–439). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Morrier, M. J., Hess, K. L., & Heflin, L. J. (2011). Teacher training for implementation of teaching strategies for students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34(2), 119–132.
National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, Committee on Educational Interventions for Children with Autism, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.
Nevin, A. I., Thousand, J. S., Paolucci-Whitcomb, P., & Villa, R. A. (1990). Collaborative consultation: Empowering public school personnel to provide heterogeneous school for all. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1, 41–67.
Nicolescu, B. (2010). Methodology of transdisciplinarity: Levels of reality, logic of the included middle and complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1, 17–32.
Orelove, F. P., & Sobsey, R. (1991). Educating children with multiple disabilities: A transdisciplinary approach (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes.
Paul, R., & Wetherby, A. (2005). New autism collaboration develops practices in communication assessment for SLPs. ASHA Leader. https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FTR7.10032005.11.
Peterson, N. (1987). Early intervention for handicapped and at-risk children: An introduction to early childhood special education. Denver, CO: Love.
Pfeiffer, D., Pavelko, S., Hahs-Vaughn, D., & Dudding, C. (2019). A national survey of speech-language pathologists’ engagement in interprofessional collaborative practice in schools: Identifying predictive factors and barriers to implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(4), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-18-0100.
Piaget, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinarity relationships. In L. Apostel, G. Berger, A. Briggs, & G. Michaud (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities (p. 138). Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Plumb, A. M., & Plexico, L. W. (2013). Autism spectrum disorders: Experience, training, and confidence levels of school-based speech-language pathologists. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 89–104.
Powell, B., McMillen, C., Proctor, E., Carpenter, C., Griffey, R., Bunger, A., et al. (2012). A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Medical Care Research Review, 69, 123–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558711430690.
Price, J. (2013). Preservice knowledge and training in autism spectrum disorders. Perspectives on Issues of Higher Education, 16(2), 71–80.
Rakap, S., Balikci, S., Parlak-Rakap, A., & Kalkan, S. (2016). An analysis of Turkish pre-service teachers’ knowledge of autism spectrum disorder: Implications for teacher preparation programs. SAGE Open, 6(3), 1–11.
Ranjan, R., Pradhan, K., & Wong, J. (2014). Effect of transdisciplinary approach in group therapy to develop social skills for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(8), 1536–1542.
Roncaglia, I. (2018). Transdisciplinary approaches embedded through PERMA with autistic individual: A case study. Psychological Thought, 11(2), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v11i2.306.
Saldana, J. (2009). An introduction to codes and coding. In J. Saldan (Ed.), The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Sanz-Cervera, P., Fernández-Andrés, M. I., Pastor-Cerezuela, G., & Tárraga-Mínguez, R. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge, misconceptions and gaps about Autism Spectrum Disorder. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(3), 212–224.
Schaaf, C., & Zoghbi, H. (2011). Solving the autism puzzle a few pieces at a time. Neuron, 70(5), 806–808.
Schwartz, H., & Drager, K. D. R. (2008). Training and knowledge in autism among speech-language pathologists: A survey. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 39, 66–77.
Stockstad, M. (2016). An evaluation of coverage of autism spectrum disorders in speech-language pathology, (Master’s thesis). Appalachia State University. Retrieved from https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/f/Stockstad,%20Marissa%202016.pdf.
Strong, J. E. (2014). Preparing teachers of students with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Evidence-based practices and teacher self-efficacy. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4685&context=etd.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
West, J. F., & Idol, L. (1990). Collaborative consultation in the education of mildly handicapped and at-risk students. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 22–31.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.-a). Employment Settings for SLPs. Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/Students/Employment-Settings-for-SLPs.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.-b). Autism (Practice Portal). Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Clinical-Topics/Autism/.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.-c). School-based service delivery in speech-language pathology. Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/slp/schools/school-based-service-delivery-in-speech-language-pathology/.
York, J., Rainforth, B., & Giangreco, M. F. (1990). Transdisciplinary teamwork and integrated therapy: Clarifying the misconceptions. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 2(2), 73–79.
Funding
This research was supported in part by a grant from the Connecticut State University Research Grant Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design, material preparation, and data collection. Analysis and theoretical frame for analysis were developed, implemented and reviewed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Deborah Weiss and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Dr. Ruth Eren has retired from Southern Connecticut State University.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Questionnaire: Transdisciplinary Approach Knowledge
True/False
-
1.
In the transdisciplinary model, environment referenced assessment identifies the context and functional targets of instruction.
-
2.
Transdisciplinary team members reach a consensus to select multiple sets of priority goals for each student, one per discipline.
-
3.
In the transdiciplinary approach, therapy in the classroom is always “integrated” therapy.
-
4.
In the transdiciplinary approach, therapists maintain direct, hands-on interaction with learners, offering learners more “therapeutic” input than direct models over time.
-
5.
In arena assessment, professionals assess a child in a staged setting utilizing only informal methods.
-
6.
Presumed benefits of the transdisciplinary approach include service efficiency, cost-effectiveness or services, and more coherent intervention plans and holistic service delivery.
-
7.
In arena assessment, parents may or may not be present, depending on their wishes.
-
8.
Three essential elements of the transdisciplinary approach are arena assessment, role release, and occasional, intensive interaction among team members.
-
9.
Role release is the most crucial and challenging component in transdisciplinary team development.
-
10.
In the transdisciplinary approach, more children can be served because fewer providers routinely see a given child.
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Working together effectively | Engaging in reciprocal learning | Maximizing expertise | Releasing roles to share implementation of strategy |
---|---|---|---|
I think I can speak for both of us when I say that we genuinely value each other’s knowledge and ideas—not only in our specific areas of study, but also when it comes to brainstorming new strategies, interventions, activities, etc. that we implement daily within our class | I believe that not only are we are working effectively together to create engaging and meaningful lessons for our students, but my partner and I are continuously learning from each other throughout the process | As the first week of the practicum comes to an end, I am finding that the overall effectiveness of our lessons is truly maximized by our different areas of expertise | We have already begun releasing our specific roles, and allowing each other to bring unique ideas to the table |
I believe that the partnership between the two disciplines working in the classroom has provided some interesting insight. I feel that our personalities and styles complement each other very well, and our ideas, creativity, and ability to plan lessons reflect similarly | My partner has both directly and indirectly taught me many strategies and interventions that I now effectively utilize on a daily basis with our kids. I have not had much experience working with nonverbal students before, and I’m starting to feel comfortable when it comes to promoting purposeful and meaningful speech and communication in our classroom | I believe that the partnership between the two disciplines working in the classroom has provided some interesting insight. I feel that our personalities and styles complement each other very well, and our ideas, creativity, and ability to plan lessons reflect similarly | I’m beginning to think of our roles as more unified than I initially expected, while also understanding that we each have our own specific skill sets |
We utilized a pacing board and began collecting data about his speech intelligibility and the number/intrusiveness of prompts required to get him to slow down and focus on his speech through use of the pacing board. This is an example of just one of the many areas that I can say I am extremely grateful to work on with my SLP partner as part of the study on the effectiveness of the transdiciplinary approach | My SED partner and I are continuing to learn from each other and continue to collaborate professionally and creatively | I respect all that my partner has to offer to these students and am confident that she feels the same about my skill set | We utilized a pacing board and began collecting data about his speech intelligibility and the number/intrusiveness of prompts required to get him to slow down and focus on his speech through use of the pacing board. This is an example of just one of the many areas that I can say I am extremely grateful to work on with my SLP partner as part of the study on the effectiveness of the transdiciplinary approach |
My SED partner and I are continuing to learn from each other and continue to collaborate professionally and creatively | My SLP partner and I continually learn from each other and transition from our normal roles in the classroom. I, for one, have learned various strategies to encourage and appropriately reinforce specific vocalizations and uses of language (especially with K and B) by working with my partner on a daily basis | My SLP partner and I continually learn from each other and transition from our normal roles in the classroom—I, for one, have learned various strategies to encourage and appropriately reinforce specific vocalizations and uses of language (especially with K and B) by working with my partner on a daily basis | |
My partner and I continue to communicate effectively on a daily basis to reflect on previous lessons, plan new lessons, and create/modify goals, both within and outside of the classroom to ensure that our class is running as smoothly as possible in order to provide the best learning experiences for our students | I’ve found that it is almost an instinct for me to now encourage any purposeful vocalizations from B, K and O after observing and working with my SLP partner for the past few weeks | I believe that it would be difficult for an outsider to initially point out the SLP and the SED teacher in our classroom, as we take on other roles and switch roles when appropriate and/or required | |
We discussed the idea of role release while reflecting on today’s lesson this afternoon—normally, my SLP partner works with B with encouraging meaningful vocalizations and social interactions (bubbles, beads, “It’s my/your turn!”) each day, but we decided that I will take over that portion of the lesson tomorrow while she works with the other students on their individual goals. We are both extremely excited to fully switch our roles in the classroom, and we are excited to see if our students will generalize their newly-learned skills when working with the other teacher | |||
I’ve seen such an increase in functional language use and speech intelligibility from B and O since the beginning of our time spent together, and my partner and I both constantly reinforce their purposeful language by saying things such as “I hear you talking, B!” and when O slows down his speech, “I understand now, O!” I am beginning to feel extremely comfortable (and almost natural) leaving my typical role as a SED teacher and taking on the role of a SLP in the classroom | |||
I’ve found that it is almost an instinct for me to now encourage any purposeful vocalizations from B, K and O after observing and working with my SLP partner for the past few weeks | |||
I am beginning to feel extremely comfortable (and almost natural) leaving my typical role as a SED teacher and taking on the role of a SLP in the classroom |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weiss, D., Cook, B. & Eren, R. Transdisciplinary Approach Practicum for Speech-Language Pathology and Special Education Graduate Students. J Autism Dev Disord 50, 3661–3678 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04413-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04413-7