Despite the importance of literacy in today’s educational curriculum, learning to read is a challenge for many children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). One of the foundational skills of early literacy learning is the ability to recognize sight words. This study used a single-subject, multiple-probe, across-participants design, to investigate the effects of a new software feature, dynamic text and speech output, on the acquisition of sight words by three pre-literate preschoolers with ASD during shared digital book reading experiences. All participants demonstrated successful acquisition of the target sight words with minimal exposure to the words. Limitations and future research directions are discussed, including the importance of investigating how the new software feature can be integrated into a more comprehensive literacy curriculum.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Boyle, S., McCoy, A., McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2017). Using digital texts in interactive reading activities for children with language delays and disorders: A review of the research literature and pilot study. Seminars in Speech and Language, 38, 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604274.
Broun, L. T. (2004). Teaching students with autism spectrum disorders to read: A visual approach. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36, 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990403600405.
Broun, L. T., & Oelwein, P. (2007). Literacy development for students with special learning needs: A strength-based approach. Port Chester: National Professional resources, Inc.
Browder, D. M., & Lalli, J. S. (1991). Review of research on sight word instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(91)90008-g.
Browder, D. M., & Xin, Y. P. (1998). A meta-analysis and review of sight word research and its implications for teaching functional reading to individuals with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 32, 130–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699803200301.
Burns, M. K. (2007). Comparison of drill ratio and opportunities to respond when rehearsing sight words with a child with mental retardation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3822.214.171.124.
Burns, M. K., & Sterling-Turner, H. E. (2010). Comparison of efficiency measures for academic interventions based on acquisition and maintenance. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20458.
Carnine, D. W. (1976). Effects of two teacher presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 199–206.
Caron, J., Light, J., Holyfield, C., & McNaughton, D. (2018). Effects of dynamic text in an AAC app on sight word reading for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1457715.
Catts, H. W., Herrera, S., Nielsen, D. C., & Bridges, M. S. (2015). Early prediction of reading comprehension within the Simple View framework. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28, 1407–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9576-x.
Coo, H., Oullette-Kuntz, H., Lloyd, J. E., Kasmara, L., Holden, J. J., & Lewis, S. (2008). Trends in autism prevalence: Diagnostic substitution revisited. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 38, 1036–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0478-x.
Ferrari, M., & Harris, S. L. (1981). The limits and motivating potential of sensory stimuli as reinforcers for autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1981.14-339.
Fossett, B., & Mirenda, P. (2006). Sight word reading in children with developmental disabilities: A comparison of paired associate and picture-to-text matching instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2005.05.006.
Gardiner, S. (2001). Ten minutes a day for silent reading. Educational Leadership, 59, 32–35.
Gutierrez-Griep, R. (1984) Student preference of sensory reinforcers. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 19, 108–13. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23877223.
Heimann, M., Nelson, K. E., Tjus, T., & Gillberg, C. (1995). Increasing reading and communication skills in children with autism through an interactive multimedia computer program. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02178294.
Holyfield, C., Light, J., McNaughton, D., Caron, J., Drager, K., & Pope, L. (2018). Effect of AAC featuring VSDs with dynamic text and speech output on the single-word reading of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and limited speech. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Houston, D., & Torgesen, J. (2004). Teaching students with moderate disabilities to read: Insights from research. Bureau of Instructional Support and Community Services, Florida Department of Education.
Huemer, S. V., & Mann, V. (2009). A comprehensive profile of decoding and comprehension in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0892-3.
Jagaroo, V., & Wilkinson, K. (2008). Further considerations of visual cognitive neuroscience in aided AAC: The potential role of motion perception systems in maximizing design display. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701390673.
Kaderavek, J. N., & Rabidoux, P. (2004). Interactive to independent literacy: A model for designing literacy goals for children with atypical communication. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 20, 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560490429050.
Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston: Pearson.
Kluth, P., & Chandler-Olcott, K. (2008). ‘‘A land we can share’’: Teaching literacy to students with autism. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
Kodak, T., Fisher, W. W., Clements, A., & Bouxsein, K. J. (2011). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on correct responding and procedural integrity during early intensive behavioral intervention. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 640–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2010.07.011.
Koppenhaver, D. A., Evans, D., & Yoder, D. (1991). Childhood reading and writing experiences of literate adults with severe speech and motor impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619112331275653.
Lang, R., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Machalicek, W., Rispoli, M., Shogren, K., et al. (2010). Review of teacher involvement in the applied intervention research for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disability, 45, 268–283.
Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2013). Literacy intervention for individuals with complex communication needs. In D. R. Beukelman & P. Mirenda (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th edn., pp. 309–351). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Light, J., McNaughton, D., Jakobs, T., & Hershberger, D. (2014). Investigating AAC technologies to support the transition from graphic symbols to literacy. RERC on AAC: Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Retrieved from https://rerc-aac.psu.edu/research/r2-investigating-aac-technologies-to-support-the-transition-from-graphic-symbols-to-literacy/.
Light, J., McNaughton, D., Weyer, M., & Karg, L. (2008). Evidence-based literacy instruction for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A case study of a student with multiple disabilities. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1079126.
Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 5, 333–369. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0504_2.
Martin, B., & Carle, E. (1984). Brown bear, brown bear, what do you see? New York, NY: Henry Holt.
Moore, M., & Calvert, S. (2000). Brief report: Vocabulary acquisition for children with autism: Teacher or computer instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 359–362. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005535602064.
Nation, K., Clarke, P., Wright, B., & Williams, C. (2006). Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0130-1.
Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006.
Rasinski, T. V., & Padak, N. (2008). From phonics to fluency: Effective teaching of decoding and reading fluency in the elementary school. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Ruppar, A. L., Gaffney, J. S., & Dymond, S. K. (2015). Influences on teachers’ decisions about literacy for secondary students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81, 209–226.
Salmon, L. G. (2013). Factors that affect emergent literacy development when engaging with electronic books. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42, 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0589-2.
Scheuermann, B., Webber, J., Boutot, A. E., & Goodwin, M. (2003). Problems with personnel preparation in autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576030180030801.
Smeets, D. J. H., van Dijken, M. J., & Bus, A. G. (2012). Using electronic storybooks to support word learning in children with severe language impairments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412467069.
Smith, F. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998).). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Spector, J. E. (2011). Sight word instruction for students with autism: An evaluation of the evidence base. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1411–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1165-x.
Therrien, M. C. S., & Light, J. (2016). Using the iPad to facilitate interaction between preschool children who use AAC and their peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32, 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1205133.
Vacca, J. S. (2007). Autistic children can be taught to read. International Journal of Special Education, 22, 54–61.
Vannest, K. J., & Ninci, J. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12038.
Watson, M., Fore, C., I. I. I., & Boon, R. T. (2009). Corrective feedback of oral decoding errors for diverse learners with reading disabilities: The effects of two methods on reading fluency. International Journal of Special Education, 24, 20–31.
Westerveld, M. F., Trembath, D., Shellshear, L., & Paynter, J. (2016). A systematic review of the literature on emergent literacy skills of preschool children with autism spectrum disorder. The Journal of Special Education, 50, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466915613593.
This study was funded by (a) a doctoral training grant funded by U.S. Department of Education Grant #H325D110008; and (b) a Grant from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR Grant #90RE5017) to the Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Augmentative and Alternative Communication (The RERC on AAC). NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this study do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and you should not assume endorsement.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
It was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
About this article
Cite this article
Mandak, K., Light, J. & McNaughton, D. Digital Books with Dynamic Text and Speech Output: Effects on Sight Word Reading for Preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 49, 1193–1204 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3817-1
- Autism spectrum disorder (ASD)
- Sight word reading
- Digital text
- Visual scene displays (VSDs)