Skip to main content
Log in

Using Progressive Time Delay to Increase Levels of Peer Imitation During Sculpting Play

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multiple probe across participants with an embedded withdrawal single case research design was used to examine the effectiveness of a progressive time delay (PTD) procedure to teach preschoolers with disabilities to imitate their peers during a sculpting play activity. Data indicated the presence of a functional relation between the use of PTD and contingent reinforcement on increased levels of peer imitation across participants; levels also decreased when PTD was withdrawn, although not to baseline levels. Overall levels of peer imitation had a greater magnitude of change than demonstrated in previous research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayres, K., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Dependent measures and measurement systems. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 124–153). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, E. E. (2015). Teaching generalized pretend play and related behaviors to young children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81, 489–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, E. E., & Ledford, J. R. (2018). The effects of reinforcement on peer imitation in a small group play context. Journal of Early Intervention. 40(1), 105381511774840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. G., & Darcy, M. (1990). Setting generality of peer modeling in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 45–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chazin, K. T., Ledford, J. R., Barton, E. E., & Osborne, K. C. (2017). The effects of antecedent exercise on engagement during large group activities for young children. Remedial and Special Education, 39, 158–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, J. E., Wells, N. J., Swanger-Gagne, M. S., Carr, J. E., Kunz, G. M., & Taylor, A. M. (2009). Evaluation of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment method using activities as stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 563–574.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. Retrieved from http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices.

  • Garfinkle, A. N., & Schwartz, I. S. (2002). Peer imitation: Increasing social interactions in children with autism and other developmental disabilities in inclusive preschool classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazdag, G., & Warren, S. F. (2000). Effects of adult contingent imitation on development of young children’s vocal imitation. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hixson, M. D. (2004). Behavioral cusps, basic behavioral repertoires, and cumulative-hierarchical learning. The Psychological Record, 54, 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, K., Loftin, R., & Lantz, J. (2009). Increasing independence in autism spectrum disorders: A review of three focused interventions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1329–1338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, B., & Hughes, C. (1995). Effects of social interactive strategies on early social-communicative skills of a preschool child with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 336–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, B., & Hughes, C. (2000). The effects of social interactive training on early social communicative skills of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 331–343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, B. (2010). Brief report: Pilot randomized controlled trial of reciprocal imitation training for teaching elicited and spontaneous imitation to children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1154–1160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, B. (2012). Brief report: Effect of a focused imitation intervention on social functioning in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 1768–1773.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, B., Lewis, E., & Kroman, E. (2007). Teaching the imitation and spontaneous use of descriptive gestures in young children with autism using a naturalistic behavioral intervention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1446–1456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, B., & Schreibman, L. (2006). Teaching reciprocal imitation skills to young children with autism using a naturalistic behavioral approach: Effects on language, pretend play, and joint attention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 487–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J. D., Gast, D. L., Shepley, C., & Ledford, J. R. (2015). Including social opportunities during small group instruction of preschool children with social-communication delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 37, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, J. R., & Gast, D. L. (2014). Combination and other designs. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral science (pp. 346–376). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, J. R., Lane, J. D., Elam, K. L., & Wolery, M. (2012). Using response-prompting procedures during small-group direct instruction: Outcomes and procedural variations. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 413–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, J. R., & Wolery, M. (2011). Teaching imitation to young children with disabilities: A review of the literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 30, 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, J. R., & Wolery, M. (2013). Peer modeling of academic and social behaviors during small-group direct instruction. Exceptional Children, 79, 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, J. R., & Wolery, M. (2015). Observational learning of academic and social behaviors during small-group direct instruction. Exceptional Children, 81, 272–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosales-Ruiz, J., & Baer, D. M. (1997). Behavioral cusps: A developmental and pragmatic concept for behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 533–544.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, W. L., Ousley, O. Y., & Littleford, C. L. (1997). Motor imitation in young children with autism: What’s the object? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25, 475–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, W. L., & Yoder, P. J. (2001). Predicting spoken language level in children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 5, 341–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strain, P. S., Schwartz, I. S., & Barton, E. E. (2011). Providing interventions for young children with autism spectrum disorders: What we still need to accomplish. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapp, J. (2003). ProcoderDV. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt Kennedy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, M. L., Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., Morris, A., DeCesare, L. D., & Cuffs, M. S. (1993). Embedding instruction in art activities to teach preschoolers with disabilities to imitate their peers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M. (2013). A commentary: Single-case design technical document of the what works clearinghouse. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. London: Longman Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the children, families, teachers, and staff of the Susan Gray School whose participation and support made this study possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E. S., E. B., and J. L. conceptualized the study. E. S. wrote an initial draft. E. B. and J. L. reviewed and edited the draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin E. Barton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Sweeney declares that she has no conflict of interest. Barton declares that she has no conflict of interest. Ledford declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sweeney, E., Barton, E.E. & Ledford, J.R. Using Progressive Time Delay to Increase Levels of Peer Imitation During Sculpting Play. J Autism Dev Disord 53, 516–524 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3638-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3638-2

Keywords

Navigation