This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Brown, D., & Pipe, M.-E. (2003). Individual differences in children’s event memory reports and the narrative elaboration technique. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.195.
Dando, C., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2009a). The cognitive interview: Novice police officers’ witness/victim interviewing practices. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 679–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802203963.
Dando, C., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2009b). The cognitive interview: The efficacy of a modified mental reinstatement of context procedure for frontline police investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1451.
Dando, C., Wilcock, R., Milne, R., & Henry, L. (2009c). A modified cognitive interview procedure for frontline police investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 698–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1501.
Henry, L. A., Crane, L., Nash, G., Hobson, Z., Kirke-Smith, M., & Wilcock, R. (2017). Verbal, visual, and intermediary support for child witnesses with autism during investigative interviews. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47, 2348–2362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3142-0.
Maras, K. L., & Bowler, D. M. (2010). The cognitive interview for eyewitnesses with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(11), 1350–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0997-8.
Maras, K. L., Mulcahy, S., Memon, A., Picariello, F., & Bowler, D. M. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of the self-administered interview for witnesses with autism spectrum disorder. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 693–701. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3055.
Mattison, M., Dando, C. J., & Ormerod, T. (2016). Drawing the answers: Sketching to support free and probed recall by child witnesses and victims with autism spectrum disorder. Autism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316669088.
Mattison, M. L. A., Dando, C. J., & Ormerod, T. (2015). Sketching to remember: Episodic free recall task support for child witnesses and victims with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(6), 1751–1765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2335-z.
Ministry of Justice (2015). The registered intermediary procedural guidance manual. England: Ministry of Justice.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our thanks to the Registered Intermediaries and other colleagues who commented on initial drafts of this letter.
Funding
The original research study to which this letter refers was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (Grant Number: ES/J020893/2).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors wrote this letter jointly and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors (Lucy Henry, Laura Crane, Gilly Nash, Zoe Hobson, Mimi Kirke-Smith and Rachel Wilcock) all declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
In the original study to which this letter refers, all procedures performed in relation to the human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Informed Consent
In the original study to which this letter refers, informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henry, L.A., Crane, L., Nash, G. et al. Response to ‘No Evidence Against Sketch Reinstatement of Context, Verbal Labels or Registered Intermediaries’. J Autism Dev Disord 48, 2597–2599 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3496-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3496-y