Attention Training in Autism as a Potential Approach to Improving Academic Performance: A School-Based Pilot Study
This study assessed the effectiveness of an attention intervention program (Computerized Progressive Attentional Training; CPAT) in improving academic performance of children with ASD. Fifteen 6–10 year olds with ASD attending a mainstream and a special school were assigned to an experimental (CPAT; n = 8) and active control (computer games; n = 7) group. Children were assessed pre- and post-intervention on measures of behavioural symptoms, cognitive skills and academic performance. The intervention was conducted in school twice a week for 8 weeks. Children in the CPAT group showed cognitive and academic improvements over and above the active control group, while children in both groups showed improvements in behaviour. Results suggest that attention training is a feasible approach to improving academic performance in this population.
KeywordsAutism Attention training Computerized training Academic performance School-based intervention
We thank the research assistants Anjli Pattni, Marianna Ruiz and Polly Brayfield for their hard work assisting the conduction of the intervention and assessments. Mayra Muller Spaniol was supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES; BEX: 2903/13-0).
This work was conducted during a scholarship supported by the International Cooperation Program CAPES at the University of Birmingham. Financed by CAPES—Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education within the Ministry of Education of Brazil, BEX: 2903/13-0.
MMS was the principal researcher, participated in the study design, coordination, performed the measurements, performed the statistical analysis, interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript; LS conceived of the study, participated in the design and interpretation of the data; LK participated in the design and coordination of the study; CM conceived of the study, participated in the design of the study, interpretation of the data and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bernardini, S., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Smith, T. J., & Avramides, K. (2012). Building autonomous social partners for autistic children. In International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, 46–52. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- Cotton, S. M., Kiely, P. M., Crewther, D. P., Thomson, B., Laycock, R., & Crewther, S. G. (2005). A normative and reliability study for the Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices for primary school aged children from Victoria, Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(3), 647–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Emerson, E., Baines, S., Allerton, L., & Welch, V. (2010). Health inequalities and people with learning disabilities in the UK: 2010. Durham: Improving Health & Lives: Learning Disabilities Observatory.Google Scholar
- Golan, O., Ashwin, E., Granader, Y., McClintock, S., Day, K., Leggett, V., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2010). Enhancing emotion recognition in children with autism spectrum conditions: An intervention using animated vehicles with real emotional faces. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(3), 269–279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 59(1), 12.Google Scholar
- Kenworthy, L., Anthony, L. G., Naiman, D. Q., Cannon, L., Wills, M. C., Luong-Tran, C., … Wallace, G. L. (2014). Randomized controlled effectiveness trial of executive function intervention for children on the autism spectrum. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 55(4), 374–383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kerns, K. A., MacSween, J., Vander Wekken, S., & Gruppuso, V. (2010). Investigating the efficacy of an attention training programme in children with foetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Developmental neurorehabilitation, 13(6), 413–422.Google Scholar
- Kinnealey, M., Pfeiffer, B., Miller, J., Roan, C., Shoener, R., & Ellner, M. L. (2012). Effect of classroom modification on attention and engagement of students with autism or dyspraxia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(5), 511–519.Google Scholar
- Murphy, C. M., Christakou, A., Daly, E. M., Ecker, C., Giampietro, V., Brammer, M., & Rubia, K. (2014). Abnormal functional activation and maturation of fronto-striato-temporal and cerebellar regions during sustained attention in autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171(10), 1107–1116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parsons, S., Charman, T., Faulkner, R., Ragan, J., Wallace, S., & Wittemeyer, K. (2013). Commentary–bridging the research and practice gap in autism: The importance of creating research partnerships with schools. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 17(3), 268–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rabiner, D. L., Murray, D. W., Skinner, A. T., & Malone, P. S. (2010). A randomized trial of two promising computer-based interventions for students with attention difficulties. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 38(1), 131–142.Google Scholar
- Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2008). Raven’s Educational: Coloured Progressive Matrices and Crichton Vocabulary Scale Manual. London: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
- Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1990). Section 2: Coloured Progressive Matrices (with US Norms) Manual for the Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Oxford: Oxford Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
- Rinehart, N. J., Bradshaw, J. L., Tonge, B. J., Brereton, A. V., & Bellgrove, M. A. (2002). A neurobehavioral examination of individuals with high-functioning autism and Asperger’s disorder using a fronto-striatal model of dysfunction. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 1(2), 164–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sampanis, D. S., Mevorach, C., Shalev, L., Mohammed, S., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015). Reducing cognitive deficits after stroke through computerized progressive attentional training (CPAT): A pilot study. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation—International, 2(7), 1058Google Scholar
- Schopler, E. C., Reichler, R., & Renner, B. (1988). The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Charman, T., Chandler, S., Loucas, T., & Baird, G. (2008). Psychiatric disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders: Prevalence, comorbidity, and associated factors in a population-derived sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47(8), 921–929.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitby, P. J. S., & Mancil, G. R. (2009). Academic achievement profiles of children with high functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: A review of the literature. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44(4), 551–560.Google Scholar