Test of Gross Motor Development-3 (TGMD-3) with the Use of Visual Supports for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Validity and Reliability
- 1.9k Downloads
The validity and reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development-3 (TGMD-3) were measured, taking into consideration the preference for visual learning of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The TGMD-3 was administered to 14 children with ASD (4–10 years) and 21 age-matched typically developing children under two conditions: TGMD-3 traditional protocol, and TGMD-3 visual support protocol. Excellent levels of internal consistency, test–retest, interrater and intrarater reliability were achieved for the TGMD-3 visual support protocol. TGMD-3 raw scores of children with ASD were significantly lower than typically developing peers, however, significantly improved using the TGMD-3 visual support protocol. This demonstrates that the TGMD-3 visual support protocol is a valid and reliable assessment of gross motor performance for children with ASD.
KeywordsTest of Gross Motor Development-3 Autism spectrum disorder Visual supports Validity Reliability Gross motor performance
All authors made a substantial contribution to the study. The study was designed by KA and JS. JS and DU supervised the study and KA collected the data. KA and JS conducted the statistical analyses. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript, and have read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
K. Allen, B. Bredero, T. Van Damme, D. Ulrich and Johan Simons declare they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bayley, H. (2006). Bayley scales of infant and toddler development (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Bayley, N. (1969). Bayley scales of infant development. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Bayley, N. (1993). Bayley scales of infant development (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling. Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological methods & research, 10(2), 141–163.Google Scholar
- Bruininks, R. H. (1978). Bruininks-oseretsky test of motor proficiency. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
- Bruininks, R. H., & Bruininks, B. D. (2005). Bruininks-oseretsky test of motor proficiency (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: AGS Publishing.Google Scholar
- Burton, A. W., & Miller, A. (1998). Movement skill assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2014). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders—Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2010. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 63(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
- Cicchetti, D. V., & Sparrow, S. S. (1990). Assessment of adaptive behavior in young children. In J. J. Johnson & J. Goldman (Eds.), Developmental assessment in clinical child psychology: A handbook (pp. 173–196). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Dewey, D., Cantell, M., & Crawford, S. G. (2007). Motor and gestural performance in children with autism spectrum disorders, developmental coordination disorder, and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13(2), 246–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Folio, M. R., & Fewell, R. R. (1983). Peabody developmental motor scales and activity cards. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
- Folio, M. R., & Fewell, R. R. (2000). Peabody developmental motor scales. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
- Henderson, S. E., & Sugden, D. A. (1992). Movement assessment battery for children. London: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Henderson, S. E., Sugden, D. A., & Barnett, A. L. (2007). Movement assessment battery for children (2nd ed.). London, UK: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- IBM Corp. (2013). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
- Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Davis, T. N., … & Sigafoos, J. (2013). Using iPods and iPads in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 147–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu, T., & Breslin, C. M. (2013a). Fine and gross motor performance of the MABC-2 by children with autism spectrum disorder and typically developing children. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(10), 1244–1249.Google Scholar
- Liu, T., & Breslin, C. M. (2013b). The effect of a picture activity schedule on performance of the MABC-2 for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 84(2), 206–212.Google Scholar
- Liu, T., Hamilton, M., Davis, L., & ElGarhy, S. (2014). Gross motor performance by children with autism spectrum disorder and typically developing children on TGMD-2. Journal of Child & Adolescent Behavior, 2(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
- McKenzie, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Broyles, S. L., Zive, M. M., Nader, P. R., Berry, C. C., & Brennan, J. J. (2002). Childhood movement skills: Predictors of physical activity in Anglo American and Mexican American adolescents? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73(3), 238–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morgan, W. A. (1939). A test for significance of the difference between the two variances in a sample from a normal bivariate population. Biometrika, 31(1–2), 13–19.Google Scholar
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (1993). Foundations of clinical research. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.Google Scholar
- Reid, G., O’Connor, J., & Lloyd, M. (2003). The autism spectrum disorders: Physical activity instruction-part III. Palaestra, 19(2), 20–29.Google Scholar
- Simons, J., & Van Hombeeck, C. (2003). Toepasbaarheid van de test of gross motor development (2nd ed.). Kinevaria, 39(4), 16–21.Google Scholar
- Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland adaptive behavior scales (2nd ed.). Livonia, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
- Ulrich, D. A. (1985). Test of gross motor development. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
- Ulrich, D. A. (with Sanford, C. B.) (2000). Test of gross motor development (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
- Ulrich, D. A. (2016). Test of gross motor development (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. http://www.kines.umich.edu/tgmd3.
- Weber, J. C., & Lamb, D. R. (1970). Statistics and research in physical education. St. Louis: Mosby Co.Google Scholar