Advertisement

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 46, Issue 11, pp 3583–3596 | Cite as

Promoting Social Interactions and Job Independence for College Students with Autism or Intellectual Disability: A Pilot Study

  • Carly B. Gilson
  • Erik W. Carter
Original Paper

Abstract

The employment outcomes for young adults with autism or intellectual disability (ID) lag far behind those of their peers without disabilities. Most postsecondary education programs for students with disabilities incorporate internship experiences to foster employment skills. However, the proximity of job coaches may inadvertently hinder social opportunities and independence. We used a multiple-probe, single-case experimental design across three college students with autism or ID to examine the effects of a coaching package on task engagement and social interactions. For all participants, interactions increased and task engagement maintained when job coaches reduced proximity and delivered prompts discreetly through bug-in-ear devices. Participants considered the intervention beneficial and unobtrusive. We present implications for supporting employment preparation within postsecondary education programs.

Keywords

Covert audio coaching Job coach Postsecondary education program Autism Intellectual and developmental disabilities Supported employment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded through a Projects of National Significance grant from the Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Administration for Community Living, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, through Grant 90DN0294. Additional support for this research came from the Office of Special Education Programs, U. S. Department of Education, through Grant H325D100010.

Author Contributions

CBG conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, collected and interpreted data, and drafted the manuscript; EWC conceived of the study, consulted on the design and coordination, and provided revisions of the manuscript writing draft.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Standard

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Allen, K. D., Burke, R. V., Howard, M. R., Wallace, D. P., & Bowen, S. L. (2012). Use of audio cuing to expand employment opportunities for adolescents with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 2410–2419. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1519-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, K., Brady, M. P., Scott, J., Dukes, C., & Frain, M. (2010). The effects of covert audio coaching on the job performance of supported employees. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25, 173–185. doi: 10.1177/1088357610371636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, K. D., Ramasamy, R., & Honsberger, T. (2013). The effects of covert audio coaching on teaching clerical skills to adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 585–593. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1597-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Table A. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population by disability status and age, 2013 and 2014 annual averages. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/disabl.a.htm.
  5. Carter, E. W., Moss, C. K., Hoffman, A., Chung, Y. C., & Sisco, L. (2011). Efficacy and social validity of peer support arrangements for adolescents with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 78, 107–125. doi: 10.1177/001440291107800107.Google Scholar
  6. Carter, E. W., Sisco, L. G., Brown, L., Brickham, D., & Al-Khabbaz, Z. A. (2008). Peer interactions and academic engagement of youth with developmental disabilities in inclusive middle and high school classrooms. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113, 479–494.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chadsey, J. (2007). Adult social relationships. In S. L. Odom, R. H. Horner, M. E. Snell, & J. Blacher (Eds.), Handbook of developmental disabilities (pp. 449–466). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gast, D. L., & Spriggs, A. D. (2010). Visual analysis of graphic data. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 199-233). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Gaumer, A. S., Morningstar, M. E., & Clark, G. M. (2004). Status of community-based transition programs: A national database. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 27, 131–149. doi: 10.1177/088572880402700202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilson, C. B., Carter, E. W., & Biggs, E. E. (2016). A systematic review of instructional methods to teach employment skills to secondary students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Manuscript submitted for publication to Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities.Google Scholar
  11. Grigal, M., Hart, D., Smith, F. A., Domin, D., Sulewski, J., & Weir, C. (2015). Think College National Coordinating Center: Annual report on the transition and postsecondary programs for students with intellectual disabilities (2013–2014). Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion.Google Scholar
  12. Grigal, M., Hart, D., & Weir, C. (2012). A survey of postsecondary education programs for students with intellectual disabilities in the United States. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 223–233. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hart, D., & Grigal, M. (2008). The new frontier: Postsecondary education for youth with intellectual disabilities. Section 504 compliance handbook. Atlanta, GA: Thompson.Google Scholar
  14. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179. doi: 10.1177/001440290507100203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Izzo, M. V., & Shuman, A. (2013). Impact of inclusive college programs serving students with intellectual disabilities on disability studies interns and typically enrolled students. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 26, 321–335.Google Scholar
  16. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mautz, D., Storey, K., & Certo, N. (2001a). Increasing integrated workplace social interactions: The effects of job modification, natural supports, adaptive communication instruction, and job coach training. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 26, 257–269. doi: 10.2511/rpsd.26.4.257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mautz, D., Storey, K., & Certo, N. (2001b). Increasing integrated workplace social interactions: The effects of job modification, natural supports, adaptive communication instruction, and job coach training. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 26(4), 257–269. doi: 10.2511/rpsd.26.4.257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Migliore, A., & Butterworth, J. (2009). Data note: Postsecondary education and employment outcomes for youth with intellectual disabilities. In Data Note XXI. Boston, MA: Institute for Community Inclusion, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  20. Migliore, A., Mank, D., Grossi, T., & Rogan, P. (2007). Integrated employment or sheltered workshops: Preferences of adults with intellectual disabilities, their families, and staff. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 26, 5–19. doi: 10.3233/JVR-150758.Google Scholar
  21. Moore, E. J., & Schelling, A. (2015). Postsecondary inclusion for individuals with intellectual disability and its effects on employment. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 19, 130–148. doi: 10.1177/1744629514564448.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Newman, L., Wagner, M., Knokey, A. M., Marder, C., Nagle, K., Shaver, D., et al. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
  23. Parsons, M. B., Reid, D. H., Green, C. W., & Browning, L. B. (2001). Reducing job coach assistance for supported workers with severe multiple disabilities: An alternative off-site/on-site model. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 151–164. doi: 10.1016/S0891-4222(01)00064-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Price, A. T., Martella, R. C., Marchand-Martella, N. E., & Clenthous, C. C. (2002). A comparison of immediate feedback delivered via a FM headset versus delayed feedback on the inappropriate verbalizations of a student with ADHD. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 159–171.Google Scholar
  25. Ryndak, D. L., Alper, S., Hughes, C., & McDonnell, J. (2012). Documenting impact of educational contexts on long-term outcomes for students with significant disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 127–138.Google Scholar
  26. Shogren, K., & Plotner, A. (2012). Transition planning for students with intellectual disability, autism, or other disabilities: Data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 16–30. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-50.1.16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, F. A., Grigal, M., & Suwelski, J. S. (2012). Postsecondary education and employment outcomes for transition-age youth with and without disabilities: A secondary analysis of American Community Survey data. Think College Insight Brief, 15, 1–4.Google Scholar
  28. Thoma, C. A., Lakin, K. C., Carlson, D., Domzal, C., Austin, K., & Boyd, K. (2011). Participation in postsecondary education for students with intellectual disabilities: A review of the literature 2001–2010. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24, 175–191.Google Scholar
  29. Wagner, M., Cameto, R., & Newman, L. (2003). Youth with disabilities: A changing population: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Special Education, Peabody CollegeVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations