Promoting Social Interactions and Job Independence for College Students with Autism or Intellectual Disability: A Pilot Study
- 2.4k Downloads
The employment outcomes for young adults with autism or intellectual disability (ID) lag far behind those of their peers without disabilities. Most postsecondary education programs for students with disabilities incorporate internship experiences to foster employment skills. However, the proximity of job coaches may inadvertently hinder social opportunities and independence. We used a multiple-probe, single-case experimental design across three college students with autism or ID to examine the effects of a coaching package on task engagement and social interactions. For all participants, interactions increased and task engagement maintained when job coaches reduced proximity and delivered prompts discreetly through bug-in-ear devices. Participants considered the intervention beneficial and unobtrusive. We present implications for supporting employment preparation within postsecondary education programs.
KeywordsCovert audio coaching Job coach Postsecondary education program Autism Intellectual and developmental disabilities Supported employment
This study was funded through a Projects of National Significance grant from the Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Administration for Community Living, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, through Grant 90DN0294. Additional support for this research came from the Office of Special Education Programs, U. S. Department of Education, through Grant H325D100010.
CBG conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, collected and interpreted data, and drafted the manuscript; EWC conceived of the study, consulted on the design and coordination, and provided revisions of the manuscript writing draft.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Allen, K. D., Burke, R. V., Howard, M. R., Wallace, D. P., & Bowen, S. L. (2012). Use of audio cuing to expand employment opportunities for adolescents with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 2410–2419. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1519-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Table A. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population by disability status and age, 2013 and 2014 annual averages. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/disabl.a.htm.
- Chadsey, J. (2007). Adult social relationships. In S. L. Odom, R. H. Horner, M. E. Snell, & J. Blacher (Eds.), Handbook of developmental disabilities (pp. 449–466). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Gast, D. L., & Spriggs, A. D. (2010). Visual analysis of graphic data. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 199-233). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gilson, C. B., Carter, E. W., & Biggs, E. E. (2016). A systematic review of instructional methods to teach employment skills to secondary students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Manuscript submitted for publication to Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities.Google Scholar
- Grigal, M., Hart, D., Smith, F. A., Domin, D., Sulewski, J., & Weir, C. (2015). Think College National Coordinating Center: Annual report on the transition and postsecondary programs for students with intellectual disabilities (2013–2014). Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion.Google Scholar
- Hart, D., & Grigal, M. (2008). The new frontier: Postsecondary education for youth with intellectual disabilities. Section 504 compliance handbook. Atlanta, GA: Thompson.Google Scholar
- Izzo, M. V., & Shuman, A. (2013). Impact of inclusive college programs serving students with intellectual disabilities on disability studies interns and typically enrolled students. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 26, 321–335.Google Scholar
- Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Mautz, D., Storey, K., & Certo, N. (2001a). Increasing integrated workplace social interactions: The effects of job modification, natural supports, adaptive communication instruction, and job coach training. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 26, 257–269. doi: 10.2511/rpsd.26.4.257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mautz, D., Storey, K., & Certo, N. (2001b). Increasing integrated workplace social interactions: The effects of job modification, natural supports, adaptive communication instruction, and job coach training. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 26(4), 257–269. doi: 10.2511/rpsd.26.4.257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Migliore, A., & Butterworth, J. (2009). Data note: Postsecondary education and employment outcomes for youth with intellectual disabilities. In Data Note XXI. Boston, MA: Institute for Community Inclusion, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- Newman, L., Wagner, M., Knokey, A. M., Marder, C., Nagle, K., Shaver, D., et al. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
- Parsons, M. B., Reid, D. H., Green, C. W., & Browning, L. B. (2001). Reducing job coach assistance for supported workers with severe multiple disabilities: An alternative off-site/on-site model. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 151–164. doi: 10.1016/S0891-4222(01)00064-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Price, A. T., Martella, R. C., Marchand-Martella, N. E., & Clenthous, C. C. (2002). A comparison of immediate feedback delivered via a FM headset versus delayed feedback on the inappropriate verbalizations of a student with ADHD. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 159–171.Google Scholar
- Ryndak, D. L., Alper, S., Hughes, C., & McDonnell, J. (2012). Documenting impact of educational contexts on long-term outcomes for students with significant disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 127–138.Google Scholar
- Shogren, K., & Plotner, A. (2012). Transition planning for students with intellectual disability, autism, or other disabilities: Data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 16–30. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-50.1.16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith, F. A., Grigal, M., & Suwelski, J. S. (2012). Postsecondary education and employment outcomes for transition-age youth with and without disabilities: A secondary analysis of American Community Survey data. Think College Insight Brief, 15, 1–4.Google Scholar
- Thoma, C. A., Lakin, K. C., Carlson, D., Domzal, C., Austin, K., & Boyd, K. (2011). Participation in postsecondary education for students with intellectual disabilities: A review of the literature 2001–2010. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24, 175–191.Google Scholar
- Wagner, M., Cameto, R., & Newman, L. (2003). Youth with disabilities: A changing population: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar