Video Modeling and Observational Learning to Teach Gaming Access to Students with ASD
- 1.4k Downloads
The purpose of this study was to evaluate both video modeling and observational learning to teach age-appropriate recreation and leisure skills (i.e., accessing video games) to students with autism spectrum disorder. Effects of video modeling were evaluated via a multiple probe design across participants and criteria for mastery were based on these results. Secondary measures were collected on observational learning across participants and behaviors. Participants included 4 children with autism, ages 8–11, who were served in self-contained special education classrooms. Results indicated a functional relation between video modeling and increased independence in gaming; observational learning occurred for at least some steps across students. Results, implications for practitioners, limitations, and ideas for future research are discussed.
KeywordsAutism ASD Video modeling Observational learning Recreation and leisure skills Video games Gaming
This manuscript was prepared from part of a doctoral dissertation completed by Amy D. Spriggs.
AD conceived the study, participated in its design and implementation, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript; DG participated in the conceptualization of the study, its design, and confirmed the data analysis; VK participated in revising the final manuscript for critically important intellectual features and confirmed statistical analysis of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study received IRB approval from the University prior to research being conducted. Parental consent was also obtained. Per IRB approval, participant assent was waived due to cognitive functioning level; parental consent was deemed sufficient.
- Ayres, K. M., & Langone, J. (2005). Intervention and instruction with video for students with autism: A review of the literature. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 183–196.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Collins, B. C., Gast, D. L., Ault, M. J., & Wolery, M. (1991). Small group instruction: Guidelines for teachers of students with moderate to severe handicaps. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 18–31.Google Scholar
- Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Coyne, P., & Fullerton, A. (2014). Supporting individuals with autism spectrum disorder in recreation. Urbana: Sagamore Publishing LLC.Google Scholar
- Dattilo, J. (1991). Recreation and leisure: A review of the literature and recommendations for future directions. In L. H. Meyer, C. A. Peck, & L. Brown (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 171–193). Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks Publishing.Google Scholar
- Delgado, J. P., & Greer, R. D. (2009). The effects of peer monitoring training on the emergence of the capability to learn from observing instruction received by peers. The Psychological Record, 59, 407–434.Google Scholar
- Dorwick, P. W., & Jesdale, D. C. (1991). Modeling. In P. W. Dorwick (Ed.), Practical guide to using video in the behavioral sciences (pp. 64–76). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
- Gast, D. L., Lloyd, B., & Ledford, J. (2014). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Francis & Taylor/Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gilliam, J. E. (2006). Gilliam Autism Rating Scale. Austin, TX: ProEd.Google Scholar
- Ihirg, K., & Wolchik, S. A. (1984). Observational learning: Peer versus adult models and autistic children’s learning. Paper presented at the Conference of the Western Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 246601).Google Scholar
- Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., et al. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
- Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (1986). The childhood autism rating scale (CARS): For diagnostic screening and classification of autism. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Spriggs, A., Lane, J., & Gast, D. L. (2014). Visual representation of data. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Francis & Taylor/Routledge.Google Scholar
- Stansberry-Brusnahan, L. L., & Collet-Lingenberg, L. L. (2010). Evidence-based practices for young children with autism spectrum disorders: Guidelines and recommendation from the nation resource council and national professional development center on autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 2, 45–56.Google Scholar
- Yoder, P. J., Bottema-Beutel, K., Woynaroski, T., Chandrasekhar, R., & Sandbank, M. (2013). Social communication intervention effects vary by dependent variable type in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 7(4), 150–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar