Evaluation of a Decision-Making Curriculum for Teaching Adolescents with Disabilities to Resist Negative Peer Pressure
- 1.2k Downloads
This study was designed to assess the impact of a decision-making curriculum (PEER-DM) on the social peer relationship knowledge and self-protective decision-making skills of adolescents with disabilities in hypothetical situations involving negative peer pressure. A randomized design was used to assign students with disabilities from self-contained special education classes to an intervention group (n = 22) or a wait-list control group (n = 20). ANCOVA analyses, using pretest scores as covariates, indicated that students who were trained on PEER-DM had significantly higher effective decision-making action and correct risk perception scores, relative to participants in the control group. This study provides supporting evidence that PEER-DM is a promising intervention for students with disabilities, including those with identified autism spectrum disorders, during transition years to help them develop a better understanding of positive and negative peer relationships and learn systematic decision-making skills for improved handling of social situations in the school and community, especially situations involving negative peer pressure. The study adds credence to using systematic, strategy-based decision making interventions designed to address the cognitive, emotional and motivational processes underlying adolescent decision making in sensitive interpersonal situations involving peer pressure. The study points to the lack of preparedness to handle situations of negative peer pressure as a serious social and health risk for adolescents with disabilities that deserves urgent and concerted attention in transition services programming. Implications for future curriculum-development efforts and replication of treatment findings are discussed. Future research examining disability-specific patterns of decision-making in peer situations and comparisons with typically developing populations is recommended.
KeywordsNegative peer pressure Curriculum intervention Decision making Adolescents with disabilities Autism spectrum disorders
We would like to thank Sarah Allen, Danielle Bartlett, Barbara Giaquinto, Hillary Krinick, Amanda Mazin, Jennifer Singer, and Ruth Zealand for their assistance in conducting this study.
Conceived research study, developed curriculum, analyzed data and wrote the paper: Ishita Khemka and Linda Hickson. Prepared materials, collected data, implemented curriculum training, and analyzed pilot data: Sarah B. Mallory.
- Gresham, F. M., Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2001). Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67(3), 331–344.Google Scholar
- Hickson, L., & Khemka, I. (1999). Decision-making and mental retardation. In L. M. Glidden (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 22, pp. 227–265). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Hickson, L., & Khemka, I. (2001a). The role of motivation in the decision-making of people with mental retardation. In H. N. Switzky (Ed.), Personality and motivational differences in persons with mental retardation (pp. 199–256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hickson, L., & Khemka, I. (2001b). The role of motivation in the interpersonal decision making of people with mental retardation. In H. N. Switzky (Ed.), Personality and motivational differences in persons with mental retardation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hickson, L., & Khemka, I. (2013). Problem solving and decision making. In M. Wehmeyer (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hickson, L., & Khemka, I. (2014). The psychology of decision making. In R. Hodapp (Ed.), International review of research in developmental disabilities (Vol. 47, pp. 185–229). Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Hickson, L., Khemka, I., Golden, H., & Chatzistyli, A. (2015). Randomized controlled trial to evaluate an abuse prevention curriculum for women and men with intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 120(6), 490–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (Eds.). (2001). Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Khemka, I., & Hickson, L. (2013). PEER-DM: Peers engaged in effective relationships: A decision-making approach. Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Khemka, I., Hickson, L., Mallory, S., & Zealand, R. (March 2013). Social vulnerability of adolescents with autism spectrum disorders and adolescents with other developmental disabilities in situations of negative peer pressure. Symposium paper presented at the 46th Annual Gatlinburg Conference on Research and Theory in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
- Murphy, G. H., & Clare, I. C. H. (2003). Adults’ capacity to make legal decisions. In R. Bull & D. Carson (Eds.), Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (pp. 31–66). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Wehmeyer, M. L., & Kelchner, K. (1994). Interpersonal cognitive problem-solving skills of individuals with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 29, 265–278.Google Scholar
- Wentzel, K. R., Donlan, A., & Morrison, D. (2012). Peer relationships and social motivational processes. In A. M. Ryan & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 79–108). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar