Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders Make a Fruit Salad with Probo, the Social Robot: An Interaction Study
- 1.1k Downloads
Social robots are thought to be motivating tools in play tasks with children with autism spectrum disorders. Thirty children with autism were included using a repeated measurements design. It was investigated if the children’s interaction with a human differed from the interaction with a social robot during a play task. Also, it was examined if the two conditions differed in their ability to elicit interaction with a human accompanying the child during the task. Interaction of the children with both partners did not differ apart from the eye-contact. Participants had more eye-contact with the social robot compared to the eye-contact with the human. The conditions did not differ regarding the interaction elicited with the human accompanying the child.
KeywordsChildren with ASD Social skills Social robots Interaction Robot assisted therapy
This material is based upon work supported by Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT) Strategic Basic research Grant Project Number 121591 (for the first author of this study). Other authors are supported by the CNCS-Bucharest, Romania Project PN-II-IDPCE-2011-3-0484—Exploring Robot-assisted therapy for children with ASD and the EU-FP7 project DREAM (Project No. 611391). We thank to the master students Stephanie Van der Donck and Debbie Willockx for their important contribution to the meticulous video annotation and implementation of the experiments and to the psychologists from the three Belgian schools, Griet and Ilse from De Leydraad school in Antwerp, Filip de Vos from Woudlucht school in Leuven and, Marie De Witte from De Oase school in Gent, for their assistance with recruitment and organization of the experiments.
The research presented in this study represents part of a PhD work of the first author. The second author, the promoter of the PhD student, guided the research process. The first and the second author contributed to the writing of the manuscript, design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation. The third author' contribution consists in supporting the PhD student with the implementation of the experiments. The fourth author is the engineer that programmed and operated the robot during the experiments, under the supervision of her promoter, the last author of this study.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, text revision (4th ed.). Washington.Google Scholar
- Anzalone, S. M., Tilmont, E., Boucenna, S., Xavier, J., Jouen, A. L., Bodeau, N., et al. (2014). How children with autism spectrum disorder behave and explore the 4-dimensional (spatial 3D+ time) environment during a joint attention induction task with a robot. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(7), 814–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. (Eds.). (2013). Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental social neuroscience. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
- Blumberg, S. J., Bramlett, M. D., Kogan, M. D., Schieve, L. A, Jones, J. R., & Lu, M. C. (2013). Changes in prevalence of parent-reported autism spectrum disorder in school-aged U.S. children: 2007 to 2011–2012. National Health Statistics Reports, 65, 1–11, 1 p following 11. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24988818
- Bons, D., van den Broek, E., Scheepers, F., Herpers, P., Rommelse, N., & Buitelaaar, J. K. (2013). Motor, emotional, and cognitive empathy in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder and conduct disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(3), 425–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cohen, B. H. (2001). Explaining psychological statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Costa, S., Santos, C., Soares, F., Ferreira, M., & Moreira, F. (2010). Promoting interaction amongst autistic adolescents using robots. Conference proceedings. In: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2010 (pp. 3856–3859). doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627905.
- Costescu, C. A., Vanderborght, B., & David, D. O. (2014). Reversal learning task in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A robot-based approach. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2319-z.
- De Silva, P. R. S., Tadano, K., Saito, A., Lambacher, S. G., & Higashi, M. (2009). Therapeutic-assisted robot for children with autism. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2009. IROS 2009. IEEE/RSJ (pp. 3561–3567). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Diehl, J. J., Crowell, C. R., Villano, M., Wier, K., Tang, K., & Riek, L. D. (2014). Clinical applications of robots in autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and treatment. In Comprehensive guide to autism (pp. 411–422). Springer: New York.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P. (2013). Emotion in the human face: Guidelines for research and an integration of findings. Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Ferrari, E., Robins, B., & Dautenhahn, K. (2009). Therapeutic and educational objectives in robot assisted play for children with autism. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2009) (pp. 108–114). Toyama, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. September 27–October 2Google Scholar
- Hendriksen, J., & Hurks III, P. (2009). WPPSI-III-NL Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence-Nederlandse bewerking.Google Scholar
- Huskens, B., Verschuur, R., Gillesen, J., Didden, R., & Barakova, E. (2013). Promoting question-asking in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorders: Effectiveness of a robot intervention compared to a human-trainer intervention. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 16(5), 345–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim, E. S., Berkovits, L. D., Bernier, E. P., Leyzberg, D., Shic, F., Paul, R., & Scassellati, B. (2013). Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(5), 1038–1049.Google Scholar
- Kozima, H., & Nakagawa, C. (2006). Interactive robots as facilitators of childrens social development. INTECH Open Access Publisher.Google Scholar
- Lausberg, H., & Sloetjes, H. (2009). Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Instruments and Computers, 41(3), 841–849.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, P., Parsons, S., & Leonard, A. (2007). Using virtual environments for teaching social understanding to 6 adolescents with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(3), 589–600.Google Scholar
- Pop, C. A., Simut, R. E., Pintea, S., Saldien, J., Rusu, A. S., Vanderfaeillie, J., et al. (2013a). Social robots vs. computer display: Does the way social stories are delivered make a difference for their effectiveness on ASD children? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(3), 381–401.Google Scholar
- Pop, C., Simut, R., Pintea, S., Saldien, J., Rusu, A., David, D., et al. (2013b). Can the social robot Probo help children with autism to identify situation-based emotions? A series of single case experiments. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics,. doi: 10.1142/S0219843613500254.Google Scholar
- Quirmbach, L. M., Lincoln, A. J., Feinberg-Gizzo, M. J., Ingersoll, B. R., & Andrews, S. M. (2009). Social stories: Mechanisms of effectiveness in increasing game play skills in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder using a pretest posttest repeated measures randomized control group design. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(2), 299–321. doi: 10.1007/s10803-008-0628-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saldien, J. (2009). The development of the huggable social robot Probo. Journal of Physical Agents, 2(2), 3–12.Google Scholar
- Saldien, J., Goris, K., Yilmazyildiz, S., Verhelst, W., & Lefeber, D. (2008). On the design of the huggable robot Probo. Journal of Physical Agents, 2(2), 3–12.Google Scholar
- Simut, R., Vanderfaeillie, J., Vanderborght, B., Pop, C., Pintea, S., Rusu, A., & David, D. (2012). Is the social robot Probo an added value for Social Story intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders? In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 235–236).Google Scholar
- Tellegen, P. J., Winkel, M., Wijnberg-Williams, B. J., & Laros, J. A. (1998). Snijders-Oomen Niet-verbale Intelligentietest, SON-R 21/2-7: Verantwoording en handleiding [Snijders-Oomen Nonverbal Intelligence Test, SON-R 21/2-7: Manual].Google Scholar
- Thill, S., Pop, C. A., Belpaeme, T., Ziemke, T., & Vanderborght, B. (2012). Robot-assisted therapy with (partially) autonomous control: Challenges and outlook. Paladyn, 3(4), 209–217.Google Scholar
- Wainer, J., Ferrari, E., Dautenhahn, K., & Robins, B. (2010). The effectiveness of using a robotics class to foster collaboration among groups of children with autism in an exploratory study. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14(5), 445–455.Google Scholar