Are Children with Autism More Responsive to Animated Characters? A Study of Interactions with Humans and Human-Controlled Avatars

Abstract

Few direct comparisons have been made between the responsiveness of children with autism to computer-generated or animated characters and their responsiveness to humans. Twelve 4- to 8-year-old children with autism interacted with a human therapist; a human-controlled, interactive avatar in a theme park; a human actor speaking like the avatar; and cartoon characters who sought social responses. We found superior gestural and verbal responses to the therapist; intermediate response levels to the avatar and the actor; and poorest responses to the cartoon characters, although attention was equivalent across conditions. These results suggest that even avatars that provide live, responsive interactions are not superior to human therapists in eliciting verbal and non-verbal communication from children with autism in this age range.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Baron-Cohen, S., Golan, O., & Ashwin, E. (2009). Can emotion recognition be taught to children with autism spectrum conditions? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 3567–3574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaumont, R., & Sofronoff, K. (2008). A multi-component social skills intervention for children with Asperger syndrome: The Junior Detective Training Program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(7), 743–753.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard-Opitz, V., Sriram, N., & Nakhoda-Sapuan, S. (2001). Enhancing social problem solving in children with autism and normal children through computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(4), 377–384.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosseler, A., & Massaro, D. W. (2003). Development and evaluation of a computer-animated tutor for vocabulary and language learning in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(6), 653–672.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cassell, J., & Tartaro, A. (2007). Intersubjectivity in human–agent interaction. Interaction Studies, 8(3), 391–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, S. H. A., & Bernard-Opitz, V. (1993). Comparison of personal and computer-assisted instruction for children with autism. Mental Retardation, 31(6), 368–376.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Conboy, B. T., & Kuhl, P. K. (2011). Impact of second-language experience in infancy: Brain measures of first- and second-language speech perception. Developmental Science, 14(2), 242–248.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Grynszpan, O., Martin, J. C., & Nadel, J. (2008). Multimedia interfaces for users with high functioning autism: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 66(8), 628–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hailpern, J. (2008). The spoken impact project: Using audio and visual feedback to impact vocalization in non-verbal children with autistic spectrum disorder. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, V. (2008). Autism, talking turtles, and the magic of Disney. Better Health. Retrieved September 25, 2013 from http://getbetterhealth.com/autism-talking-turtles-and-the-magic-of-disney/2008.06.26.

  11. Kuhl, P. K. (2007). Is speech learning ‘gated’ by the social brain? Developmental Science, 10(1), 110–120.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F. M., & Liu, H. M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), 9096–9101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lasseter, J., & Stanton, A. (2003). Finding Nemo [Motion picture]. USA: Walt Disney Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Linebarger, D. L., & Walker, D. (2004). Infants’ and toddlers’ television viewing and language outcomes. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H, Jr, Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule—Generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205–223.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Le Couteur, A. (1994). Autism diagnostic interview-revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(5), 659–685.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, J. F., & Chapman, R. S. (2010). Systematic analysis of language transcripts [Computer software]. Madison: University of Wisconsin—Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Milne, M., Luerssen, M. H., Lewis, T. W., Leibbrandt, R. E., & Powers, D. M. (2010). Development of a virtual agent based social tutor for children with autism spectrum disorders. In The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1–9). IEEE.

  19. Mineo, B. A., Ziegler, W., Gill, S., & Salkin, D. (2009). Engagement with electronic screen media among students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(1), 172–187.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moore, M., & Calvert, S. (2000). Brief report: Vocabulary acquisition for children with autism: Teacher or computer instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(4), 359–362.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Plienis, A. J., & Romanczyk, R. G. (1985). Analyses of performance, behavior, and predictors for severely disturbed children: A comparison of adult vs. computer instruction. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5(4), 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ploog, B. O., Scharf, A., Nelson, D., & Brooks, P. J. (2013). Use of computer-assisted technologies (CAT) to enhance social, communicative, and language development in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(2), 301–322.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramdoss, S., Lang, R., Mulloy, A., Franco, J., O’Reilly, M., Didden, R., et al. (2011). Use of computer-based interventions to teach communication skills to children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tager-Flusberg, H., Rogers, S., Cooper, J., Landa, R., Lord, C., Paul, R., et al. (2009). Defining spoken language benchmarks and selecting measures of expressive language development for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 643–652.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tartaro, A., & Cassell, J. (2008). Playing with virtual peers: Bootstrapping contingent discourse in children with autism. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences-Volume 2 (pp. 382–389). International Society of the Learning Sciences.

  26. Tjus, T., Heimann, M., & Nelson, K. E. (2001). Interaction patterns between children and their teachers when using a specific multimedia and communication strategy observations from children with autism and mixed intellectual disabilities. Autism, 5(2), 175–187.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Williams, J. H., Massaro, D. W., Peel, N. J., Bosseler, A., & Suddendorf, T. (2004). Visual–auditory integration during speech imitation in autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25(6), 559–575.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this research was provided by Disney Research, Pittsburgh. We wish to thank Lori Georganna for facilitating all aspects of our interaction with the theme park, as well as Casey Lovoy, Dana Barvinchak, Mk Haley, Brooke Kelly, Chelsea Kogelschatz, Dayna Rubendall, and Breanna Fisher for their assistance in performing this research. We thank the Autism Society of America and the Autism Society of Greater Orlando for their help in recruiting.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Elizabeth J. Carter or Jill F. Lehman.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 24 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 26 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carter, E.J., Williams, D.L., Hodgins, J.K. et al. Are Children with Autism More Responsive to Animated Characters? A Study of Interactions with Humans and Human-Controlled Avatars. J Autism Dev Disord 44, 2475–2485 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2116-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Autism
  • Animated characters
  • Computer-assisted technology
  • Computer-based interactions
  • Communication
  • Avatars