Are Children with Autism More Responsive to Animated Characters? A Study of Interactions with Humans and Human-Controlled Avatars
- 1.1k Downloads
Few direct comparisons have been made between the responsiveness of children with autism to computer-generated or animated characters and their responsiveness to humans. Twelve 4- to 8-year-old children with autism interacted with a human therapist; a human-controlled, interactive avatar in a theme park; a human actor speaking like the avatar; and cartoon characters who sought social responses. We found superior gestural and verbal responses to the therapist; intermediate response levels to the avatar and the actor; and poorest responses to the cartoon characters, although attention was equivalent across conditions. These results suggest that even avatars that provide live, responsive interactions are not superior to human therapists in eliciting verbal and non-verbal communication from children with autism in this age range.
KeywordsAutism Animated characters Computer-assisted technology Computer-based interactions Communication Avatars
Financial support for this research was provided by Disney Research, Pittsburgh. We wish to thank Lori Georganna for facilitating all aspects of our interaction with the theme park, as well as Casey Lovoy, Dana Barvinchak, Mk Haley, Brooke Kelly, Chelsea Kogelschatz, Dayna Rubendall, and Breanna Fisher for their assistance in performing this research. We thank the Autism Society of America and the Autism Society of Greater Orlando for their help in recruiting.
- Hailpern, J. (2008). The spoken impact project: Using audio and visual feedback to impact vocalization in non-verbal children with autistic spectrum disorder. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
- Jones, V. (2008). Autism, talking turtles, and the magic of Disney. Better Health. Retrieved September 25, 2013 from http://getbetterhealth.com/autism-talking-turtles-and-the-magic-of-disney/2008.06.26.
- Lasseter, J., & Stanton, A. (2003). Finding Nemo [Motion picture]. USA: Walt Disney Pictures.Google Scholar
- Linebarger, D. L., & Walker, D. (2004). Infants’ and toddlers’ television viewing and language outcomes. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 1–22.Google Scholar
- Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H, Jr, Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule—Generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miller, J. F., & Chapman, R. S. (2010). Systematic analysis of language transcripts [Computer software]. Madison: University of Wisconsin—Madison.Google Scholar
- Milne, M., Luerssen, M. H., Lewis, T. W., Leibbrandt, R. E., & Powers, D. M. (2010). Development of a virtual agent based social tutor for children with autism spectrum disorders. In The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1–9). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Tager-Flusberg, H., Rogers, S., Cooper, J., Landa, R., Lord, C., Paul, R., et al. (2009). Defining spoken language benchmarks and selecting measures of expressive language development for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 643–652.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Tartaro, A., & Cassell, J. (2008). Playing with virtual peers: Bootstrapping contingent discourse in children with autism. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences-Volume 2 (pp. 382–389). International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar