Abstract
The author examined critically three beliefs of S.S. Stevens pertaining to his quadripartite system of scales of measurement: (1) There are four scales of measurement in common usage (2) These scales and the scientific disciplines that use them can be incrementally graded for levels of reliability and validity or accuracy such that: Nominal scale variables produce the lowest levels of reliability and accuracy; with successively improving levels for Ordinal, Equal Interval, and Equal Ratio scales; and (3) The scale upon which a variable is measured determines the type of statistical test that one is permitted to apply. It was shown that each of the three beliefs is fundamentally flawed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartko, J. J. (1966). The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of rater agreement. Psychological Reports, 19, 3–11.
Bartko, J. J. (1976). On various intraclass correlation cofficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 762–765.
Bolanowski, S. J., & Gescheider, (Eds.). (1991). Ratio scaling of psychological magnitude: In honor of the memory of S.S. Stevens. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Buchler, J. (1940). Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.
Cicchetti, D. V. (1976). Assessing inter-rater reliability for rating scales: Resolving some basic issues. British Journal of Psychiatry, 129, 452–456.
Cicchetti, D. V., Bronen, R., Spencer, S., Haut, S., Berg, A., Oliver, P., et al. (2006). Rating scales, scales of measurement, and issues of reliability: Resolving some critical issues for clinicians. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194, 564–567.
Cicchetti, D. V., Showalter, D., & Tyrer, P. (1985). The effect of number of rating scale categories upon levels of inter-rater reliability: A Monte Carlo investigation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 31–36.
Cohen, J. (1960). Α coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23, 37–46.
Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213–220.
Colman, A. M., & Preston, C. C. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1–15.
Coombs, C. H. (1953). Theory and methods of social measurement. In L. Festinger, D. Katz (Eds.), Research methods in the behavioral sciences, (pp. 471–535). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Embretson, S. E., & Hershberger, S. L. (1999). The new rules of measurement: What every psychologist should know. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fleiss, J. L. (1975). Measuring agreement between two judges on the presence or absence of a trait. Biometrics, 31, 651–659.
Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of agreement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 613–619.
Freeman, L. C. (1965). Elementary applied statistics. New York: Wiley.
Grimm, L. G., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Guttman, L. (1941). The quantification of a class of attributes: A theory and method of scale construction. In P. Horst, et al. (Eds.), The prediction of personal adjustment, (pp. 319–348). New York: Social Science Research Council, Bulletin 48.
Kraemer, H. C., Kazdin, A. E., Offord, D. R., Kessler, R. C., Jensen, P. S., & Kupfer, D. J. (1997). Coming to terms with the concept of risk. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 337–343.
McNemar, Q. (1955). Psychological statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Miller, G. A. (1975). Stanley Smith Stevens, 1906–1973: A biographical memoir. Washington, D.C.: New York Academy of Sciences.
Rice, I. L., & Wagstaff, A. K. (1967). Client voice quality and expressive style as indexes of productive psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 3, 557–563.
Sholten, A. Z., & Borsboom, D. (2009). A re-analysis of Lord’s treatment of football numbers. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, 69–75.
Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, & Balla, D. A. (2008). Vineland II: A revision of the Vineland adaptive behavior scales: III. Expanded form: Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland II: A revision of the Vineland adaptive behavior scales: I. Survey/caregiver form (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, & Balla, D. A. (2006). Vineland II: A revision of the Vineland adaptive behavior scales: II. Teacher report form (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 10, 677–680.
Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1–49). New York: Wiley.
Stevens, S. S. (1968). Measurement, statistics, and the schemapiric view. Science, 161, 849–856.
Weiss, D. (1986). The discriminating power of ordinal data. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 381–389.
Wright, B. D. (1999). Fundamental measurement for psychology. In S. E. Embretson & S. L. Hershberger (Eds.), The new rules of measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Yule, G. U. (1912). On the methods of measuring two attributes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 75, 579–642.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cicchetti, D.V. On Scales of Measurement in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) and Beyond: Where Smitty Went Wrong. J Autism Dev Disord 44, 303–309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1486-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1486-z