Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 238–245 | Cite as

Antenatal Ultrasound and Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorders

  • Judith K. Grether
  • Sherian Xu Li
  • Cathleen K. Yoshida
  • Lisa A. Croen
Original Paper

Abstract

We evaluated antenatal ultrasound (U/S) exposure as a risk factor for autism spectrum disorders (ASD), comparing affected singleton children and control children born 1995–1999 and enrolled in the Kaiser Permanente health care system. Among children with ASD (n = 362) and controls (n = 393), 13% had no antenatal exposure to U/S examinations; case–control differences in number of exposures during the entire gestation or by trimester were small and not statistically significant. In analyses adjusted for covariates, cases were generally similar to controls with regard to the number of U/S scans throughout gestation and during each trimester. This study indicates that antenatal U/S is unlikely to increase the risk of ASD, although studies examining ASD subgroups remain to be conducted.

Keywords

Antenatal ultrasound Obstetrical ultrasound Autism 

References

  1. Ang, E. S., Jr., Gluncic, V., Duque, A., Schafer, M., & Rakic, P. (2006). Prenatal exposure to ultrasound waves impacts neuronal migration in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(34), 12903–12910.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network. (2007). Surveillance Year 2002 Principal Investigators; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders-autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 14 sites, United States, 2002. MMWR Surveillance Summary, 56(1), 12–28.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, S. B. (2002). Routine ultrasound scanning in first trimester: What are the risks? Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MR, 23(5), 387–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauman, M., & Kemper, T. L. (2005). Neuroanatomic observations of the brain in autism: A review and future directions. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 23(2–3), 183–187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellieni, C. V., Buonocore, G., Bagnoli, F., Cordelli, D. M., Gasparre, O., Calonaci, F., et al. (2005). Is an excessive number of prenatal echographies a risk for fetal growth? Early Human Development, 81(8), 689–693.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bly, S., & Van den Hof, M. C. (2005). Obstetric ultrasound biological effects and safety. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 27(6), 572–580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, J., Elford, R., & Brant, R. (1993). Case–control study of prenatal ultrasonography exposure in children with delayed speech. CMAJ, 149(10), 1435–1440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Croen, L., Matevia, M., Yoshida, C., & Grether, J. (2008). Maternal Rh D status, anti-D immune globulin exposure during pregnancy, and risk of autism spectrum disorders. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 199(3), 234.e1–234.e6. Epub 2008 Jun 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dane, S., & Balci, N. (2007). Handedness, eyedness and nasal cycle in children with autism. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 25(4), 223–226. Epub 2007 Mar 24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gillberg, C. (1983). Autistic children’s hand preferences: Results from an epidemiological study of infantile autism. Psychiatry Research, 10(1), 21–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hershkovitz, R., Sheiner, E., & Mazor, M. (2002). Ultrasound in obstetrics: A review of safety. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 101(1), 15–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang, L. (1994). Ultrasound technology: The RADIUS (Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound) study & national policy. Journal of Clinical Engineering, 19(4), 297–309.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Keller, F., & Persico, A. (2003). The neurobiological context of autism. Molecular Neurobiology, 28(1), 1–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kieler, H., Ahlsten, G., Haglund, B., Salvesen, K., & Axelsson, O. (1998a). Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children’s subsequent neurologic development. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 91(5 Pt 1), 750–756.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kieler, H., Axelsson, O., Haglund, B., Nilsson, S., & Salvesen, K. A. (1998b). Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children’s subsequent handedness. Early Human Development, 50(2), 233–245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kieler, H., Cnattingius, S., Haglund, B., Palmgren, J., & Axelsson, O. (2001). Sinistrality—A side-effect of prenatal sonography: A comparative study of young men. Epidemiology, 12(6), 618–623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kieler, H., Haglund, B., Cnattingius, S., Palmgren, J., & Axelsson, O. (2005). Does prenatal sonography affect intellectual performance? Epidemiology, 16(3), 304–310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Krieger, N. (1992). Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: Validation and application of a census-based methodology. American Journal of Public Health, 82(5), 703–710.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lawler, C., Croen, L., Grether, J., & Van de Water, J. (2004). Identifying environmental contributions to autism: Provocative clues and false leads. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 10(4), 292–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewin, J., Kohen, D., & Mathew, G. (1993). Handedness in mental handicap: Investigation into populations of Down’s Syndrome, epilepsy and autism. British Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 674–676.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lord, C., Rutter, M., DeLovere, P. C., & Risi, S. (2000). The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  22. Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Le Couteur, A. (1994). Autism diagnostic interview-revised. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(5), 659–685.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyons, E. A., Dyke, C., Toms, M., & Cheang, M. (1988). In utero exposure to diagnostic ultrasound: A 6-year follow-up. Radiology, 166(3), 687–690.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Marinac-Dabic, D., Krulewitch, C. J., & Moore, R. M., Jr. (2002). The safety of prenatal ultrasound exposure in human studies. Epidemiology, 13(3 Suppl), S19–S22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mole, R. (1986). Possible hazards of imaging and Doppler ultrasound in obstetrics. Birth, 13(1), 29–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Muhle, R., Trentacoste, S. V., & Rapin, I. (2004). The genetics of autism. Pediatrics, 113(5), e472–e486.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Newnham, J. P., Doherty, D. A., Kendall, G. E., Zubrick, S. R., Landau, L. L., & Stanley, F. J. (2004). Effects of repeated prenatal ultrasound examinations on childhood outcome up to 8 years of age: Follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 364(9450), 2038–2044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Newnham, J. P., Evans, S. F., Michael, C. A., Stanley, F. J., & Landau, L. I. (1993). Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 342(8876), 887–891.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Newschaffer, C. J., Fallin, D., & Lee, N. L. (2002). Heritable and nonheritable risk factors for autism spectrum disorders. Epidemiologic Reviews, 24(2), 137–153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rados, C. (2004). FDA cautions against ultrasounds ‘keepsake’ images. FDA Consumer, 38(1), 12–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rodgers C. (2006). Questions about prenatal ultrasound and the alarming increase in autism. Midwifery Today with International Midwife, (80), 16–19, 66–17.Google Scholar
  32. Rodier, P. M. (2004). Environmental causes of central nervous system maldevelopment. Pediatrics, 113(4 suppl), 1076–1083.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Salvesen, K. A. (2007). Epidemiological prenatal ultrasound studies. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 93(1–3), 295–300. Epub 2006 Aug 22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Salvesen, K. A., Vatten, L. J., Eik-Nes, S. H., Hugdahl, K., & Bakketeig, L. S. (1993). Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent handedness and neurological development. BMJ, 307(6897), 159–164.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Scheidt, P. C., Stanley, F., & Bryla, D. A. (1978). One-year follow-up of infants exposed to ultrasound in utero. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 131(7), 743–748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Stark, C. R., Orleans, M., Haverkamp, A. D., & Murphy, J. (1984). Short- and long-term risks after exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in utero. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 63(2), 194–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith K. Grether
    • 1
  • Sherian Xu Li
    • 2
  • Cathleen K. Yoshida
    • 2
  • Lisa A. Croen
    • 2
  1. 1.Environmental Health Investigations BranchCalifornia Department of Public HealthRichmondUSA
  2. 2.Division of ResearchKaiser Permanente of Northern CaliforniaCAUSA

Personalised recommendations