Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Developmental Propensity Model Extends to Oppositional Defiant Disorder: a Twin Study

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has supported the developmental propensity model, which proposes that three socioemotional dispositions (prosociality, negative emotionality, and daring) increase risk for the development of conduct problems through shared genetic and environmental influences. The current study extends this research by examining the model in relation to oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). Based on a confirmatory factor analysis, ODD was examined as three separate dimensions (irritable, headstrong, and hurtful) rather than a unitary construct. Parents of 686 same-sex twins (ages 7–13) provided ratings of their twins’ dispositions and ODD symptoms. Results from a path model examining phenotypic relationships showed that all dispositions were significantly related to each ODD dimension, except daring was not predictive of the irritable dimension. Preliminary twin analyses showed nonadditive genetic effects only on daring, which limited the appropriateness of evaluating it with the other dispositions. Results from a series of models used to examine etiological associations showed all ODD dimensions had common additive genetic influences with prosociality and negative emotionality. Only headstrong had common additive genetic influences with daring. Irritable and headstrong had common shared environmental influences with respect for rules (an aspect of prosociality), and common nonshared environmental influences with negative emotionality. Hurtful showed no shared environmental influences, but it had common nonshared environmental influences with prosociality and negative emotionality. These findings support the idea that the socioemotional dispositions in the developmental propensity model have some common etiological influences with ODD dimensions, suggesting this model can provide a novel framework for understanding the development of ODD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, S., & Lee, S. S. (2017). Early-onset conduct problems: Predictions from daring temperament and risk taking behavior. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39, 575–584.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bornovalona, M. A., Hicks, B. M., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2010). Familial transmission and heritability of childhood disruptive disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 1066–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J. D., Hipwell, A. E., & Loeber, R. (2010). Dimensions of oppositional defiant disorder as predictors of depression and conduct disorder in preadolescent girls. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 49(5), 484–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, S. A. (2009). Rethinking environmental contributions to child and adolescent psychopathology: A meta-analysis of shared environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 608–637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, S. A., Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G. (2001). Sources of covariation among attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder: The importance of shared environment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(4), 516–525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canino, G., Polanczyk, G., Bauermeister, J. J., Rohde, L. A., & Frick, P. J. (2010). Does the prevalence of CD and ODD vary across cultures? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45, 695–704.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, D. M., Viken, R. J., Kaprio, J., Pulkkinen, L., & Rose, R. J. (2005). Understanding the covariation among childhood externalizing symptoms: Genetic and environmental influences on conduct disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and oppositional defiant disorder symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(2), 219–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herzhoff, K., Smack, A. J., Reardon, K. W., Martel, M. M., & Tackett, J. L. (2017). Child personality accounts for oppositional defiant disorder comorbidity patterns. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45, 327–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hudziak, J. J., Derks, E. M., Althoff, R. R., Copeland, W., & Boomsma, D. I. (2005). The genetic and environmental contributions to oppositional defiant behavior: A multi-informant twin study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(9), 907–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahey, B. B. (2004). Commentary: Role of temperament in developmental models of psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33(1), 88–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lahey, B. B., & Waldman, I. D. (2003). A developmental propensity model of the origins of conduct problems during childhood and adolescence. In B. B. Lahey, T. E. Moffitt, & A. Caspi (Eds.), The causes of conduct disorder and serious juvenile delinquency (pp. 76–117). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahey, B. B., Applegate, B., Chronis, A. M., Jones, H. A., Williams, S. H., Loney, J., & Waldman, I. D. (2008). Psychometric characteristics of a measure of emotional dispositions developed to test a developmental propensity model of conduct disorder. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37(4), 794–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahey, B. B., Class, Q. A., Zald, D. H., Rathouz, P. J., Applegate, B., & Waldman, I. D. (2017). Prospective test of the developmental propensity model of antisocial behavior: From childhood and adolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59, 676–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lykken, D. T., Bouchard, T. J., McGue, M., & Tellegen, A. (1990). The Minnesota twin registry: Some initial findings. Acta Geneticae Medicate at Gemellologiae: Twin Research, 39(1), 35–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGue, M., & Bouchard, T. J. (1984). Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behavior Genetics, 14(4), 325–343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikolajewski, A. J., Allan, N. P., Hart, S. A., Lonigan, C. J., & Taylor, J. (2013). Negative affect shares genetic and environmental influences with symptoms of childhood internalizing and externalizing disorders. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(3), 411–423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mikolajewski, A. J., Chavarria, J., Moltisanti, A., Hart, S. A., & Tayor, J. (2014). Examining the factor structure and etiology of prosociality. Psychological Assessment, 26(4), 1259–1267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mikolajewski, A. J., Taylor, J., & Iacono, W. G. (2017). Oppositional defiant disorder dimensions: Genetic influences and risk for later psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(6), 702–710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nock, M. K., Kazdin, A. E., Hiripi, E., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). Lifetime prevalence, correlates, and persistence of oppositional defiant disorder: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(7), 703–713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, W. E., Gnagy, E. M., Greenslade, K. E., & Milich, R. (1992). Teacher ratings of DSM-III-R symptoms for disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 31(2), 210–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, S. H., Friedman, N. P., Corley, R. P., Hewitt, J. K., Hink, L. K., Johnson, D. P., Smith Watts, A. K., Young, S. E., Robinson, J. A., Waldman, I. D., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2016). An examination of the developmental propensity model of conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(4), 550–564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, R., Maughan, B., Pickles, A., Costello, E. J., & Angold, A. (2002). The relationship between DSM-IV oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: Findings from the great Smokey Mountains study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(3), 365–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, R., Costello, E. J., Angold, A., Copeland, W. E., & Maughan, B. (2010). Developmental pathways in oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119(4), 726–738.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. L., & Waldman, I. D. (2010). The etiology of associations between negative emotionality and childhood externalizing disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119(2), 376–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stringaris, A., & Goodman, R. (2009a). Three dimensions of oppositionality in youth. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(3), 216–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stringaris, A., & Goodman, R. (2009b). Longitudinal outcome of youth oppositionality: Irritable, headstrong, and hurtful behaviors have distinctive predictions. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 48(4), 404–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringaris, A., Maughan, B., & Goodman, R. (2010). What’s in a disruptive disorder? Temperamental antecedents of oppositional defiant disorder: Findings from the Avon longitudinal study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 49(5), 474–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tackett, J. L. (2006). Evaluating models of the personality-psychopathology relationship in children and adolescents. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(5), 584–599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tackett, J. L., Lahey, B. B., van Hulle, C., Waldman, I., Krueger, R. F., & Rathouz, P. J. (2013). Common genetic influences on negative emotionality and a general psychopathology factor in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(4), 1142–1153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J., Allan, N., Mikolajewski, A. J., & Hart, S. A. (2013a). Common genetic and nonshared environmental factors contribute to the association between socieoemotional dispositions and the externalizing factor in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(1), 67–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. E., Hart, S. A., Mikolajewski, A. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2013b). An update on the Florida state twin registry. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16(1), 471–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trentacosta, C. J., Hyde, L. W., Shaw, D. S., & Cheong, J. (2009). Adolescent dispositions for antisocial behavior in context: The roles of neighborhood dangerousness and parental knowledge. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118(3), 564–575.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, I. D., Singh, A. L., & Lahey, B. B. (2006). Dispositional dimensions and the causal structure of child and adolescent conduct problems. In R. F. Krueger & J. L. Tacket (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 112–152). New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, I. D., Tackett, J. L., Van Hulle, C. A., Applegate, B., Pardini, D., Frick, P. J., & Lahey, B. B. (2011). Child and adolescent conduct disorder substantially shares genetic influences with three socioemotional dispositions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(1), 57–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported, in part, by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50 HD052120). Views expressed herein are those of the authors and have neither been reviewed nor approved by the granting agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave., #8448, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA

    Amy J. Mikolajewski

  2. Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA

    Sara A. Hart

  3. Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA

    Sara A. Hart & Jeanette Taylor

Authors
  1. Amy J. Mikolajewski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sara A. Hart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeanette Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy J. Mikolajewski.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Florida State University Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mikolajewski, A.J., Hart, S.A. & Taylor, J. The Developmental Propensity Model Extends to Oppositional Defiant Disorder: a Twin Study. J Abnorm Child Psychol 47, 1611–1623 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-019-00556-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-019-00556-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation