Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 46, Issue 6, pp 1201–1202 | Cite as

Correction to: Reduced Value-Driven Attentional Capture among Children with ADHD Compared to Typically Developing Controls

  • Anthony W. Sali
  • Brian A. Anderson
  • Steven Yantis
  • Stewart H. Mostofsky
  • Keri S. Rosch
Correction

Correction to: J Abnorm Child Psychol

 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-017-0345-y

The authors would like to correct a few minor errors in our article, none of which change the conclusions or interpretations presented. First, we had incorrectly described the auditory feedback presented to participants when they failed to respond during the task. Second, we neglected to state the number of participants excluded in the delay discounting and symptom severity correlations due to outlying data. Third, we failed to note an exception to the statement that all participants completed both training sessions on the same day, as we had to deviate from this protocol for one participant. Fourth, we incorrectly reported Cohen’s d for a small, non-significant effect and reversed the sign for a small, non-significant correlation. Finally, we omitted the non-significant diagnostic group by session interaction from Table 2. For completeness, we would like to add this non-significant interaction test as shown in the corrected table presented on the next page.
Table 2

ANOVA results

Effect

F-statistic (p-value)

Partial eta-squared

Training phase behavioral accuracies

 Main effect of session

3.59 (0.065)

0.072

 Main effect of target value

3.20 (0.08)

0.065

 Main effect of diagnostic group

1.25 (0.269)

0.026

 Diagnostic group x target value

0.38 (0.543)

0.008

 Diagnostic group x session

0.90 (0.349)

0.019

 Session x target value

0.76 (0.388)

0.016

 Diagnostic group x session x target value

3.29 (0.076)

0.067

Test phase behavioral accuracies

 Main effect of diagnostic group

5.33 (0.025)

0.104

 Main effect of distractor presence

2.40 (0.128)

0.050

 Diagnostic group x distractor presence

0.01 (0.944)

< 0.001

Test phase VDAC

 Main effect of diagnostic group

14.97 (< 0.001)

0.246

 Main effect of experimental half

5.76 (0.021)

0.111

 Diagnostic group x half

0.62 (0.436)

0.013

The original article has been corrected.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018
corrected publication April/2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony W. Sali
    • 1
  • Brian A. Anderson
    • 2
  • Steven Yantis
    • 3
  • Stewart H. Mostofsky
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • Keri S. Rosch
    • 4
    • 5
    • 7
  1. 1.Center for Cognitive NeuroscienceDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.Center for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging ResearchKennedy Krieger InstituteBaltimoreUSA
  5. 5.Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  6. 6.Department of NeurologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  7. 7.Neuropsychology DepartmentKennedy Krieger InstituteBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations