Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 795–809 | Cite as

Functions of Aggression and Peer Victimization in Elementary School Children: the Mediating Role of Social Preference

  • Sam Manring
  • L. Christian Elledge
  • Lisette W. Swails
  • Eric M. Vernberg
Article

Abstract

This study examined whether social preference was a mechanism that explained the relation between proactive and reactive aggression and peer victimization. Participants were 494 children in grades 2–5. Proactive and reactive aggression was assessed via a self-report measure and indices of social preference and peer victimization were assessed via a peer nomination inventory. Data was collected during the fall and spring of two academic years. The relations among aggression, social preference, and peer victimization varied as a function of aggression and gender. For girls, reactive aggression was a significant negative predictor of social preference. Findings also revealed social preference mediated the relation between reactive aggression and peer victimization for girls. This pathway did not hold for boys. There was some evidence that proactive aggression was negatively associated with peer victimization, but only for girls. Findings from the current study suggest social preference may be a key mechanism through which reactive aggression is associated with future victimization for girls. Boys’ aggression was not related to subsequent peer victimization. Future research and intervention efforts should consider gender differences and the function of aggression when investigating children’s peer victimization experiences.

Keywords

Proactive and reactive aggression Peer victimization Teacher-student relationships Peer relationships Peer acceptance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (F32HD066833). We would also like to thank the Lawrence Public School District and its students, families, and faculty for their participation and support.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for child behavior checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Dept. of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  5. Bierman, K. L., Kalvin, C. B., & Heinrichs, B. S. (2015). Early childhood precursors and adolescent sequelae of grade school peer rejection and victimization. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44, 367–379. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.873983.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boivin, M., & Hymel, S. (1997). Peer experiences and social self-perceptions: A sequential model. Developmental Psychology, 33, 135–145. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.33.1.135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2001). Toward a process view of peer rejection and harassment. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 265–289). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Buhs, E. S., Ladd, G. W., & Herald, S. L. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimization: Processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children's classroom engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 1–13. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Camodeca, M., Goossens, F. A., Meerum Terwogt, M., & Schuengel, C. (2002). Bullying and victimization among school-age children: Stability and links to proactive and reactive aggression. Social Development, 11, 332–345. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 466–480. doi: 10.1177/0165025406071904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Lansu, T. A. M. (2015). Stability, correlates, and time-covarying associations of peer victimization from grade 4 to 12. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44, 456–470. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.958841.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 17–59). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Crick, N. R. (1997). Engagement in gender normative versus nonnormative forms of aggression: Links to social–psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33, 610–617. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms on reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 993–1002. doi: 10.2307/1131875.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Crick, N. R., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2003). The development of psychopathology in females and males: Current progress and future challenges. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 719–742. doi: 10.1017/S095457940300035X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146–1158. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fite, P. J., Colder, C. R., & Pelham, W. E. (2006). A factor analytic approach to distinguish pure and co-occurring dimensions of proactive and reactive aggression. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35, 578–582. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3504_9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fite, P. J., Colder, C. R., Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2007). Pathways from proactive and reactive aggression to substance use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21, 355–364. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.21.3.355.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fite, P. J., Stoppelbein, L., & Greening, L. (2009). Proactive and reactive aggression in a child psychiatric inpatient population: Relations to psychopathic characteristics. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 481–493. doi: 10.1007/s10862-015-9503-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fite, P. J., Wimsatt, A., Elkins, S., & Grassetti, S. (2012). Contextual influences of proactive and reactive subtypes of aggression. Child Indicators Research, 5, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fite, P. J., Poquiz, J., Cooley, J. L., Stoppelbein, L., Becker, S. P., Luebbe, A. M., & Greening, L. (2016). Risk factors associated with proactive and reactive aggression in a child psychiatric inpatient sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38, 56–65. doi: 10.1007/s10862-015-9503-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2000). Predictors of peer victimization among urban youth. Social Development, 9, 521–543. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 69–89. doi: 10.1017/S0954579402001049.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanish, L. D., Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Spinrad, T. L., Ryan, P., & Schmidt, S. (2004). The expression and regulation of negative emotions: Risk factors for young children's peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 335–353. doi: 10.1017/S0954579404044542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10, 512–527. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hodges, E. V. E., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 94–101. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hubbard, J. A., McAuliffe, M. D., Morrow, M. T., & Romano, L. J. (2010). Reactive and proactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: Precursors, outcomes, processes, experiences, and measurement. Journal of Personality, 78, 95–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00610.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kawabata, Y., Tseng, W. L., & Crick, N. R. (2014). Adaptive, maladaptive, mediational, and bidirectional processes of relational and physical aggression, relational and physical victimization, and peer liking. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 273–287. doi: 10.1002/ab.21517.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lamarche, V., Brendgen, M., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., Pérusse, D., & Dionne, G. (2006). Do friendships and sibling relationships provide protection against peer victimization in a similar way? Social Development, 15, 373–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2006.00347.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lamarche, V., Brendgen, M., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., Dionne, G., & Pérusse, D. (2007). Do friends' characteristics moderate the prospective links between peer victimization and reactive and proactive aggression? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 665–680. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9122-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Little, R. J. A. (1995). Modeling the drop-out mechanism in longitudinal studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 1112–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  37. Little, T. D., Brauner, J., Jones, S. M., Nock, M. K., & Hawley, P. H. (2003a). Rethinking aggression: A typological examination of the functions of aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 343–369. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2003.0014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Little, T. D., Jones, S. M., Henrich, C. C., & Hawley, P. H. (2003b). Disentangling the "whys" from the "whats" of aggressive behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 122–133. doi: 10.1080/01650250244000128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lochman, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (1998). Distorted perceptions in dyadic interactions of aggressive and nonaggressive boys: Effects of prior expectations, context, and boys' age. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 495–512. doi: 10.1017/S0954579498001710.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2011). Mplus User’s Guide (Sixth ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  41. Ostrov, J. M. (2008). Forms of aggression and peer victimization during early childhood: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 311–322. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9179-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ostrov, J. M., & Godleski, S. A. (2010). Toward an integrated gender-linked model of aggression subtypes in early and middle childhood. Psychological Review, 117, 233–242. doi: 10.1037/a0018070.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ostrov, J. M., & Godleski, S. A. (2013). Relational aggression, victimization, and adjustment during middle childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 801–815. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ostrov, J. M., Kamper, K. E., Hart, E. J., Godleski, S. A., & Blakely-McClure, S. J. (2014). A gender-balanced approach to the study of peer victimization and aggression subtypes in early childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 575–587. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.09.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Poulin, F., & Boivin, M. (2000a). Reactive and proactive aggression: Evidence of a two-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 12, 115–122. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.12.2.115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Poulin, F., & Boivin, M. (2000b). The role of proactive and reactive aggression in the formation and development of boys’ friendships. Developmental Psychology, 36, 233–240. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.2.233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Price, J. M., & Dodge, K. A. (1989). Reactive and proactive aggression in childhood: Relations to peer status and social context dimensions. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, 455–471. doi: 10.1007/BF00915038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310–342. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2003.0015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Prinstein, M. J., & La Greca, A. M. (2004). Childhood peer rejection and aggression as predictors of adolescent girls' externalizing and health risk behaviors: A 6-year longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 103–112. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.1.103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., et al. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159–171. doi: 10.1002/ab.20115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Salmivalli, C., & Helteenvuori, T. (2007). Reactive, but not proactive aggression predicts victimization among boys. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 198–206. doi: 10.1002/ab.20210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Salmivalli, C., & Nieminen, E. (2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 30–44. doi: 10.1002/ab.90004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996a). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1%3C1::AID-AB1%3E3.0.CO;2-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Salmivalli, C., Karhunen, J., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1996b). How do the victims respond to bullying? Aggressive Behavior, 22, 99–109. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:2%3C99:AID-AB3%3E3.0.CO;2-P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., Hubbard, J. A., Cillessen, A. H. N., Lemerise, E. A., & Bateman, H. (1998). Social-cognitive and behavioral correlates of aggression and victimization in boys' play groups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 431–440. doi: 10.1023/A:1022695601088.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Schwartz, D., McFadyen-Ketchum, S., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (1999). Early behavior problems as a predictor of later peer group victimization: Moderators and mediators in the pathways of social risk. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 191–201. doi: 10.1023/A:1021948206165.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Sentse, M., Kretschmer, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). The longitudinal interplay between bullying, victimization, and social status: Age-related and gender differences. Social Development, 24, 659–677. doi: 10.1111/sode.12115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vitaro, F., & Brendgen, M. (2005). Proactive and reactive aggression: A developmental perspective. In R. E. Tremblay, W. W. Hartup, & J. Archer (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression (pp. 178–201). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  60. Waschbusch, D. A., Willoughby, M. T., & Pelham Jr., W. E. (1998). Criterion validity and the utility of reactive and proactive aggression: Comparisons to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, and other measures of functioning. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 396–405. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2704_3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  3. 3.Center for Child Health and Human DevelopmentUniversity of KansasKansas CityUSA
  4. 4.Clinical Child Psychology ProgramUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations