Abstract
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a popular standardised instrument typically used for screening psychopathology in children and adolescents. However, peer reviewed studies evaluating the psychometric properties of the parent-rated preschool SDQ are lacking. The current study involved mothers of 5481 2 year olds (52 % male) from the Growing Up in New Zealand cohort, and investigated the psychometric properties of the preschool SDQ within this cohort. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the SDQ’s factor structure and test for measurement invariance of the factor model. Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure the internal consistency of the subscales and total difficulties scale. We found support for a modified five-factor model, in which the prosocial factor was extended into a positive construal factor by allowing cross-loadings of reverse-scored items. Full measurement invariance was found across gender and socioeconomic status, and partial invariance was found across mother’s ethnicity. Cronbach’s alpha was satisfactory for all subscales (α range = 0.71–0.84), except peer problems (α = 0.54). Normative scores and bandings for normal, borderline and abnormal ranges are described for each subscale. Analyses revealed group differences in scores for child’s gender, mother’s ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Overall, satisfactory psychometric properties were found for the preschool SDQ in 2 year olds, indicating that that the questionnaire can be used in very young children.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We included children with complete gender, SES and SDQ data (as opposed to complete gender, SES, SDQ and mother’s ethnicity data), as our analyses with mother’s ethnicity only include a subsample of the total sample due to the exclusion of the ‘Other’ ethnic group (see discussion of mother’s ethnicity measure in methods). As such, some participants from our final sample of 5481 children have missing data for mother’s self-prioritised ethnicity (n = 16).
Abbreviations
- SES:
-
Socioeconomic status
- SDQ:
-
Strengths and difficulties questionnaire
- CAPI:
-
Computer assisted personal interviews
- CFA:
-
Confirmatory factor analysis
- CFI:
-
Comparative fit index
- TLI:
-
The Tucker-Lewis index
- RMSEA:
-
Root mean square error of approximation
- MANOVA:
-
Multivariate analysis of variance
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
References
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1983). Manual for the child behavior checklist and revised child behavior profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
Bardone, A. M., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Dickson, N., Stanton, W. R., & Silva, P. A. (1998). Adult physical health outcomes of adolescent girls with conduct disorder, depression, and anxiety. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 37, 594–601. doi:10.1097/00004583-199806000-00009.
Becker, A., Woerner, W., Hasselhorn, M., Banaschewski, T., & Rothenberger, A. (2004). Validation of the parent and teacher SDQ in a clinical sample. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, ii11-ii16. doi:10.1007/s00787–004–2003-5.
Biederman, J. (2005). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a selective overview. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1215–1220. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.020.
Bittner, A., Egger, H. L., Erkanli, A., Jane Costello, E., Foley, D. L., & Angold, A. (2007). What do childhood anxiety disorders predict? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 1174–1183. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01812.x.
Bourdon, K. H., Goodman, R., Rae, D. S., Simpson, G., & Koretz, D. S. (2005). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: U.S. normative data and psychometric properties. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 557–564. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000159157.57075.c8.
Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Newman, D. L., & Silva, P. A. (1996). Behavioral observations at age 3 years predict adult psychiatric disorders. Longitudinal evidence from a birth cohort. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 1033–1039.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn. Hillsdale, New Jersey: L. Erlbaum.
Croft, S., Stride, C., Maughan, B., & Rowe, R. (2015). Validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in preschool-aged children. Pediatrics, 135, e1210–e1219. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-2920.
Dickey, W. C., & Blumberg, S. J. (2004). Revisiting the factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: United States, 2001. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 1159–1167. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000132808.36708.a9.
Doi, Y., Ishihara, K., & Uchiyama, M. (2014). Reliability of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Japanese preschool children aged 4-6 years. Journal of Epidemiology, 24(6), 514–518. doi:10.2188/jea.JE20140050.
Du, Y., Kou, J., & Coghill, D. (2008). The validity, reliability and normative scores of the parent, teacher and self report versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in China. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2, 8. doi:10.1186/1753-2000-2-8.
Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Clarke, M., DiGuiseppi, C., Pratap, S., Wentz, R., et al. (2002). Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ, 324, 1183. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.
Egger, H. L., & Angold, A. (2006). Common emotional and behavioral disorders in preschool children: presentation, nosology, and epidemiology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 313–337. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01618.x.
Einon, D., & Potegal, M. (1994). Temper tantrums in young children (pp. 157–194). The Dynamics of Aggression: Biological and Social Processes in Dyads and Groups.
Ezpeleta, L., de la Osa, N., & Doménech, J. M. (2013a). Prevalence of DSM-IV disorders, comorbidity and impairment in 3-year-old Spanish preschoolers. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49, 145–155. doi:10.1007/s00127-013-0683-1.
Ezpeleta, L., Granero, R., de la Osa, N., de Penelo, E., & Domènech, J. M. (2013b). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties Questionnaire3–4 in 3-year-old preschoolers. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 54, 282–291. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.07.009.
Fergusson, D. M., & Lynskey, M. T. (1998). Conduct problems in childhood and psychosocial outcomes in young adulthood: a prospective study. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 6, 2–18. doi:10.1177/106342669800600101.
Fergusson, D. M., John Horwood, L., & Ridder, E. M. (2005). Show me the child at seven: the consequences of conduct problems in childhood for psychosocial functioning in adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 837–849. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00387.x.
Galesic, M., & Bosnjak, M. (2009). Effects of questionnaire length on participation and indicators of response quality in a web survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 349–360. doi:10.1093/poq/nfp031.
Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.
Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337–1345.
Hawes, D. J., & Dadds, M. R. (2004). Australian data and psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 644–651.
He, J.-P., Burstein, M., Schmitz, A., & Merikangas, K. R. (2013). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): the factor structure and scale validation in U.S. adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 583–595. doi:10.1007/s10802-012-9696-6.
Hill, C. R., & Hughes, J. N. (2007). An examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 380–406. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.22.3.380.
Hofstra, M. B., van der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F. C. (2002). Child and adolescent problems predict DSM-IV disorders in adulthood: a 14-year follow-up of a Dutch epidemiological sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 182–189 http://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200202000-00012.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
Iida, Y., Moriwaki, A., Komatsu, S., & Kamio (2014). Standardization of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire among Japanese 4–5 year-old preschool children. In Y. Kamio (Ed.), In Annual report of research supported by health and labour sciences research grants. Prevalence of developmental disorders and its developmental change: a community-based cross-sectional and prospective study (pp. 33–41). National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry: Tokyo.
Jenkins, S., Owen, C., Bax, M., & Hart, H. (1984). Continuities of common behaviour problems in preschool children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 25, 75–89. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1984.tb01720.x.
Klein, A. M., Otto, Y., Fuchs, S., Zenger, M., & von Klitzing, K. (2013). Psychometric properties of the parent-rated SDQ in preschoolers. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 96–104. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000129.
Kremer, P., de Silva, A., Cleary, J., Santoro, G., Weston, K., Steele, E., et al. (2015). Normative data for the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for young children in Australia. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 51, 970–975. doi:10.1111/jpc.12897.
Matsuishi, T., Nagano, M., Araki, Y., Tanaka, Y., Iwasaki, M., Yamashita, Y., et al. (2008). Scale properties of the Japanese version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): a study of infant and school children in community samples. Brain and Development, 30, 410–415. doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2007.12.003.
Mellor, D. (2005). Normative data for the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Australia. Australian Psychologist, 40, 215–222.
Mellor, D., & Stokes, M. (2007). The factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 105–112. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.23.2.105.
Morton, S. M. B., Carr, P. E. A., Grant, C. C., Robinson, E. M., Bandara, D. K., Bird, A., et al. (2013). Cohort profile: growing up in New Zealand. International Journal of Epidemiology, 42, 65–75. doi:10.1093/ije/dyr206.
Morton, S. M. B., Grant, C. C., Carr, P. E. A., Robinson, E. M., Kinloch, J. M., Fleming, C. J., et al. (2014). How do you recruit and retain a prebirth cohort? Lessons learnt from growing up in New Zealand. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 37(4), 411–433. doi:10.1177/0163278712462717.
Morton, S. M. B., Ramke, J., Kinloch, J., Grant, C. C., Carr, P. A., Leeson, H., et al. (2015). Growing up in New Zealand cohort alignment with all New Zealand births. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 39, 82–87. doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12220.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H., & Berge, J. M. ten. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226). McGraw-Hill New York. Retrieved from http://rds.epi-ucsf.org/ticr/syllabus/courses/46/2005/10/20/Lecture/readings/Psychometric%20Theory.pdf.
Odgers, C. L., Caspi, A., Broadbent, J. M., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., et al. (2007). Prediction of differential adult health burden by conduct problem subtypes in males. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 476–484. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.4.476.
Palmieri, P. A., & Smith, G. C. (2007). Examining the structural validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in a U.S. sample of custodial grandmothers. Psychological Assessment, 19, 189–198. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.189.
Piedmont, R. L. (2014). Inter-item correlations. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 3303–3304). Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1493.
Pornprasertmanit, S., Miller, P., Schoemann, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2013). semTools: useful tools for structural equation modeling. R Package Available on CRAN.
Poulou, M. S. (2013). Emotional and behavioural difficulties in preschool. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 225–236. doi:10.1007/s10826-013-9828-9.
Reiss, F. (2013). Socioeconomic inequalities and mental health problems in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 90, 24–31. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.026.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2007). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In Handbook of Child Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0310/abstract.
Salmond, C., Crampton, P., & Atkinson, J. (2007). NZDep2006 index of deprivation. Wellington: University of Otago (Department of Public Health).
Sim, F., O’Dowd, J., Thompson, L., Law, J., Macmillan, S., Affleck, M., et al. (2013). Language and social/emotional problems identified at a universal developmental assessment at 30 months. BMC Pediatrics, 13, 206.
Statistics New Zealand (2004). Report of the review of the measurement of ethnicity. Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand.
Statistics New Zealand (2005). Statistical standard for ethnicity. Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand.
Steenkamp, J.-B. E., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–107.
Stone, L. L., Otten, R., Engels, R. C. M. E., Vermulst, A. A., & Janssens, J. M. A. M. (2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: a review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13, 254–274. doi:10.1007/s10567-010-0071-2.
Stone, L. L., Otten, R., Ringlever, L., Hiemstra, M., Engels, R. C. M. E., Vermulst, A. A., et al. (2013). The parent version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: omega as an alternative to alpha and a test for measurement invariance. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 44–50. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000119.
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 99–103.
Theunissen, M. H., Vogels, A. G., de Wolff, M. S., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2013). Characteristics of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in preschool children. Pediatrics, 131, e446–e454.
van de Looij-Jansen, P. M., Goedhart, A. W., de Wilde, E. J., & Treffers, P. D. (2011). Confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance analysis of the adolescent self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire: how important are method effects and minor factors? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 127–144.
Van Leeuwen, K., Meerschaert, T., Bosmans, G., De Medts, L., & Braet, C. (2006). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a community sample of young children in Flanders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 189–197. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.22.3.189.
Van Roy, B., Veenstra, M., & Clench-Aas, J. (2008). Construct validity of the five-factor strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early, and late adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 1304–1312. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01942.x.
Williams, D. R., & Collins, C. (1995). US socioeconomic and racial differences in health: patterns and explanations. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 349–386.
Woerner, W., Becker, A., & Rothenberger, A. (2004). Normative data and scale properties of the German parent SDQ. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, ii3–ii10. doi:10.1007/s00787–004–2002-6.
Youth in Mind. (2014). SDQ: information for researchers and professionals about the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires. Retrieved from http://www.sdqinfo.com/.
Acknowledgments
The study has been designed and conducted by the Growing Up in New Zealand study team, led by the University of Auckland. The authors acknowledge the contributions of the original study investigators: Susan M.B. Morton, Polly E. Atatoa Carr, Cameron C. Grant, Arier C. Lee, Dinusha K. Bandara, Jatender Mohal, Jennifer M. Kinloch, Johanna M. Schmidt, Mary R. Hedges, Vivienne C. Ivory, Te Kani R. Kingi, Renee Liang, Lana M. Perese, Elizabeth Peterson, Jan. E. Pryor, Elaine Reese, Elizabeth M. Robinson, Karen E. Waldie, Clare R. Wall. The views reported in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Growing Up in New Zealand investigators.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
Growing Up in New Zealand has been funded by the New Zealand Ministries of Social Development, Health, Education, Justice, and Pacific Island Affairs; the former Ministry of Science Innovation and the former Department of Labour (now both part of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment); the former Ministry of Women’s Affairs (now the Ministry for Women); the Department of Corrections; the Families Commission (now known as the Social Policy Evaluation and Research Unit); Te Puni Kokiri; New Zealand Police; Sport New Zealand; the Housing New Zealand Corporation; and the former Mental Health Commission, The University of Auckland and Auckland UniServices Limited. Other support for the study has been provided by the NZ Health Research Council, Statistics New Zealand, the Office of the Children’s Commissioner and the Office of Ethnic Affairs.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Electronic supplementary material
Table S1
(DOCX 14 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D’Souza, S., Waldie, K.E., Peterson, E.R. et al. Psychometric Properties and Normative Data for the Preschool Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Two-Year-Old Children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 45, 345–357 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0176-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0176-2