A Comprehensive Evaluation of a Universal School-Based Depression Prevention Program for Adolescents
- 1.2k Downloads
The present study proposes and demonstrates a comprehensive framework for evaluation of a universal school-based depression prevention program. Efficacy was evaluated by considering the impact of continuous versus categorical approaches to operationalizing outcome, the effect of the intervention on key change agent variables, and moderation of intervention effects by student symptom severity at baseline. Participants 252 adolescent boys and girls (60 % male), aged 13 to 17 years (M = 13.62 years, SD = 0.60 years) from four schools in the state of Victoria, Australia, who were allocated by school into a waitlist = control (n = 88) or a CBT-based intervention (n = 164) group. The intervention involved six 45-min weekly sessions run during wellbeing classes. While the intervention and control groups did not differ in average improvement in symptoms by post-intervention, further analyses showed that responsiveness was highly variable within the intervention, and those with elevated depressive symptoms benefitted most. The proposed change agents of self-esteem, resilience, body image satisfaction, and perceived social support did not uniquely predict change in depressive symptoms but collectively accounted for substantial variance in this change process. Collectively, this framework provided insights into aspects of the intervention that worked and highlighted areas for improvement, thus providing clear direction for future research.
KeywordsUniversal intervention Depression Adolescents School-based
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Angold, A., Costello, E. J., Messer, S. C., Pickles, A., Winder, F., & Silver, D. (1995). Development of a short questionnaire for use in epidemiological studies of depression in children and adolescents. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 5, 237–249.Google Scholar
- Araya, R., Fritsch, R., Spears, M., Rojas, G., Martinez, V., Barroilet, S., … Montgomery, A.A. (2013). School intervention to improve mental health of students in Santiago, Chile: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatrics, 167, 1004–1010.Google Scholar
- Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2010). Is life in Australia getting any better? Canberra: ABS. Measures of Australia’s progress, Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/1370.0~2010~Main%20Features~Home%20page%20(1).Google Scholar
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2013). Mental health services – In brief 2013 Cat. no. HSE 141. Canberra: AIHW. Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129544726.Google Scholar
- Byrne, B. B. (2012). Structural Equation Modelling with MPlus. Basic Concepts, Application and Programming. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cardemil, E. V., Reivich, K. J., & Seligman, M. (2002). The prevention of depressive symptoms in low-income minority middle school students. Prevention & Treatment, 5(1), 8a.Google Scholar
- Gillham, J.E., Reivich, K.J., Freres, D.R., Chaplin, T.M., Shatté, A.J., Samuels, B., … Seligman, M.E. (2007). School-based prevention of depressive symptoms: A randomized controlled study of the effectiveness and specificity of the Penn Resiliency Program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 9–19.Google Scholar
- Hetrick, S. E., Cox, G. R., & Merry, S. N. (2015). Where to go from here? An exploratory meta-analysis of the most promising approaches to depression prevention programs for children and adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 4758–4795.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- McArdle, J. J. (2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analyses. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sorbom (Eds.), Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future (pp. 342–380). Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
- McLaughlin. (2009). Universal prevention for adolescent depression. In S. Nolen-Hoeksema & L. M. Hilt (Eds.), Handbook of Depression in Adolescents (pp. 661–684). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Merry, S. N., Hetrick, S. E., Cox, G. R., Brudevold-Iversen, T., Bir, J. R., & McDowell, J. J. (2011). Cochrane review: psychological and educational interventions for preventing depression in children and adolescents. Evidence-based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal, 7, 1409–1685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Poppelaars, M., Yuli, R. T., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., Engels, R. C. M. E., Lobel, A., Merry, S. N., Lacassen, M. F. G., & Granic, I. (2014). Autonomous and controlled motivation in a randomized controlled trial comparing school-based and computerized depression prevention programs. In B. Shouten, S. Fedtke, M. V. Schijven, & A. Gekker (Eds.), Games for Health (pp. 125–134). Amsterdam: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
- Possel, P., Horn, A. B., & Hautzinger, M. (2003). Preliminary results of a school-based depression prevention program for adolescents. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 10–20.Google Scholar
- Pössel, P., Martin, N. C., Garber, J., & Hautzinger, M. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioral program for the prevention of depression in adolescents compared with nonspecific and no-intervention control conditions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 432–438.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reinwand, D. A., Schulz, D. N., Crutzen, R., Kremers, S. P. J., & de Vries, H. (2015). Who follows eHealth interventions as recommended? A study of participants’ personal characteristics from the experimental arm of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medicine Internet Research, 17, e115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ricciardelli, L. A., & McCabe, M. P. (2000). Psychometric Evaluation of the Body Image and Body Change Inventory: An Assessment Instrument for Adolescent Boys and Girls. Melbourne: Deakin University. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Salazar-Pousada, D., Arroyo, D., Hidalgo, L., Perez-Lopez, F.R., & Chedraui, P. (2010). Depressive Symptoms and Resilience among Pregnant Adolescents: A Case–control Study. Obstetrics and Gynecology International, 2010.Google Scholar
- Sawyer, M. G., Pfeiffer, S., Spence, S. H., Bond, L., Graetz, B., Kay, D., Patton, G., & Sheffield, J. (2010). School-based prevention of depression: a randomised controlled study of the beyond blue schools research initiative. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 199–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sheffield, J. K., Spence, S. H., Rapee, R. M., Kowalenko, N., Wignall, A., Davis, A., & McLoone, J. (2006). Evaluation of universal, indicated and combined cognitive behavioral approaches to the prevention of depression among adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 66–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sinclair, S. J., Blais, M. A., Gansler, D. A., Sandberg, E., Bistis, K., & LoCicero, A. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: overall and across demographic groups living within the United States. Evaluations & the Health Professions, 33(1), 56–80.Google Scholar
- Stallard, P., Sayal, K., Phillips, R., Taylor, J.A., Spears, M., Anderson, R., Araya, R., … Montgomery, A.A. (2012). Classroom based cognitive behavioural therapy in reducing symptoms of depression in high risk adolescents: Pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 345, e6058.Google Scholar