Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 691–703 | Cite as

Social Risk and Peer Victimization in Elementary School Children: The Protective Role of Teacher-Student Relationships

  • L. Christian ElledgeEmail author
  • Allison R. Elledge
  • Rebecca A. Newgent
  • Timothy A. Cavell
Article

Abstract

Children not accepted or actively rejected by peers are at greater risk for peer victimization. We examined whether a positive teacher-student relationship can potentially buffer these children from the risk of peer victimization. Participants were 361 elementary school children in the 4th or 5th grade. Peer-report measures were used to assess teacher-student relationship quality (TSRQ), social preference, and rejected sociometric status; peer victimization was assessed via self-, peer-, and teacher-reports. As expected, social preference assessed in the fall semester was a significant negative predictor of self- and peer-reported victimization measured in the spring, controlling for prior levels of peer victimization. TSRQ in the fall was not a significant unique predictor of self-, peer-, or teacher-reported victimization the following spring, controlling for fall victimization and social preference scores. We found a significant interaction between social preference and TSRQ in predicting self-, peer-, and teacher-reported peer victimization: Social preference significantly predicted peer victimization, but only for those children with relatively poor student-teacher relationships. Subgroup analysis revealed that children actively rejected by peers in the fall reported significantly less peer victimization in the spring (controlling for fall victimization scores) when their fall TSRQ scores were at or above the sample mean compared to rejected children whose TSRQ scores were low (i.e., < −0.5 SD below the mean). Findings offer preliminary support for the notion that teacher-student relationship quality can buffer children at social risk for continued peer victimization.

Keywords

Bullying Peer victimization Teacher-student relationships Peer relationships Peer acceptance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the College of Education and Health Professions and from the Marie Wilson Howells Endowment in the Department of Psychology at the University of Arkansas. The authors wish to thank the Springdale School District and its students and faculty for their cooperation and participation.

Ethical Standards

This project was approved by the University Institutional Review Board, and written parental consent and child assent were obtained for all participating children prior to study participation.

Conflict of Interest

The author’s declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Asher, S. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1986). Identifying children who are rejected by their peers. Developmental Psychology, 22, 444–449. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.22.4.444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babad, E. (1990). The teacher’s pet phenomenon: rate of occurrence, correlates, and psychological costs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 637–645. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman, S., & Del Rio, A. (2006). Preservice teachers' responses to bullying scenarios: comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 219–231. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2001). Toward a process view of peer rejection and harassment. In J. Juvonen, & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 265–289). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed., ). New York:The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buhs, E. S. (2005). Peer rejection, negative peer treatment, and school adjustment: self-concept and classroom engagement as mediating processes. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 407–424. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2005.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Card, N. A., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2008). Peer victimization among schoolchildren: correlations, causes, consequences, and considerations in assessment and intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 451–461. doi: 10.1037/a0012769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Card, N. A., Isaacs, J., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2007). Correlates of school victimization: implications for prevention and intervention. In J. E. Zins, M. J. Elias, & C. A. Maher (Eds.), Bullying, victimization, and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention and intervention (pp. 339–368). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  10. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimension and types of social status: a cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher, & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 17–59). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (1997). Observations of bullying and victimization in the school yard. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 13, 41–59. doi: 10.1177/082957359801300205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darwich, L., Hymel, S., & Waterhouse, T. (2012). School avoidance and substance use among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning youths: the impact of peer victimization and adult support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 381–392. doi: 10.1037/a0026684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davidson, L. M., & Demaray, M. K. (2007). Social support as a moderator between victimization and internalizing-externalizing distress from bullying. School Psychology Review, 36, 383–405.Google Scholar
  15. Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: what have we learned and where do we go from here? School Psychology Review, 32, 365–383.Google Scholar
  16. Estell, D. B., Farmer, T. W., Irvin, M. J., Akos, P., Boudah, D. J., & Crowther, A. (2009). Students with exceptionalities and the peer group context of bullying and victimization in late elementary school. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18, 136–150. doi: 10.1007/s10826-008-9214-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gazelle, H., & Ladd, G. (2002). Interventions for children victimized by peers. In P. Schewe (Ed.), Preventing violence in relationships: Interventions across the life span (pp. 55–78). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10455-003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gest, S. D., Sesma, A., Masten, A. S., & Tellegen, A. (2006). Childhood peer reputation as a predictor of competence and symptoms 10 years later. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 509–526. doi: 10.1007/s10802-006-9029-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625–638. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Student-teacher relationships. In G. G. Bear (Ed.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 59–71). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  21. Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., & Mashburn, A. J. (2008). Teachers' perceptions of conflict with young students: looking beyond problem behavior. Social Development, 17, 115–136.Google Scholar
  22. Hanish, L. D., Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., Fabes, R. A., Martin, C. L., & Denning, D. (2004). Bullying among young children: the influence of peers and teachers. In D. L. Espelage, & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 141–159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Hawker, D., & Boulton, M. (2000). Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441–455. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00629.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirschstein, M. K., Van Schoiack Edstrom, L., Frey, K. S., Snell, J. L., & MacKenzie, E. P. (2007). Walking the talk in bullying prevention: teacher implementation variables related to initial impact of the steps to respect program. School Psychology Review, 36, 3–21.Google Scholar
  25. Hodges, E. V. E., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of friendship: protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 94–101. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hodges, E. V. E., Malone, M. J., & Perry, D. G. (1997). Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1032–1039. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.1032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Horne, A., Swearer, S. M., Givens, J., & Meints, C. (2010). Bully busters: reducing bullying by changing teacher and student behavior. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 507–516). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Howes, C., Hamilton, C. E., & Matheson, C. C. (1994). Children’s relationships with peers: differential associations with aspects of the teacher-child relationship. Child Development, 65, 253–263. doi: 10.2307/1131379.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria verus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughes, J. N. (2011). Longitudinal effects of teacher and student perceptions of teacher-student relationship qualities on academic adjustment. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 38–60. doi: 10.1086/660686.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Hughes, J. N., Cavell, T. A., & Jackson, T. (1999). Influence of teacher-student relationships on childhood conduct problems: a prospective study. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 28, 173–184. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2802_5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hughes, J. N., Cavell, T. A., & Willson, V. (2001). Further support for the developmental significance of the quality of the teacher-student relationship. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 289–301. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00074-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hughes, J. N., & Chen, Q. (2011). Reciprocal effects of student-teacher and student-peer relatedness: effects on academic Self efficacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 278–287. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2010.03.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Hughes, J. N., & Kwok, O. (2006). Classroom engagement mediates the effect of teacher-student support on elementary students' peer acceptance: a prospective analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 465–480. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2005.10.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Kallestad, J. H., & Olweus, D. (2003). Predicting teachers' schools' implementation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: A multilevel study. Prevention and Treatment, 6, np. doi: 10.1037/1522-3736.6.1.621a
  36. Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: grades 4–6. Child Development, 82(1), 311–330. doi: 10.1111/j1467-8624.2010.01557.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: an empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. J. (2004). Peer victimization: the role of emotions in adaptive and maladaptive coping. Social Development, 13, 329–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.00271.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kochenderfer, B., & Ladd, G. W. (1996). Peer victimization: cause or consequence of school maladjustment? Child Development, 67, 1305–1317. doi: 10.2307/1131701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kochenderfer, B. J., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). Victimized children’s responses to peers' aggression: behaviors associated with reduced versus continued victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 59–73. doi: 10.1017/S0954579497001065.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Wardrop, J. L. (2001). Chronicity and instability of children’s peer victimization experiences as predictors of loneliness and social satisfaction trajectories. Child Development, 72, 134–151. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ladd, B., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, G. W. (2002). Identifying victims of peer aggression from early to middle childhood: analysis of cross-informant data for concordance, estimation of relational adjustment, prevalence of victimization, and characteristics of identified victims. Psychological Assessment, 14(1), 74–96. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.14.1.74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Li, Y., Hughes, J. N., Kwok, O., & Hsu, H. (2012). Evidence of convergent and discriminant calidity of child, teacher, and peer reports of teacher-student support. Psychological Assessment, 24, 54–65. doi: 10.1037/a0024481.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York:Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  45. Little, R. J. A. (1995). Modeling the drop-out mechanism in longitudinal studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 1112–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285–300. doi: 10.1037/a0033266.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Little, T. D., Slegers, D. W., & Card, N. A. (2006). A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 59–72. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1301_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ma, L., Phelps, E., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). The development of academic competence among adolescents who bully and who are bullied. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 628–644. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2009.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Masten, A. S., Morison, P., & Pellegrini, D. S. (1985). A revised class play method of peer assessment. Developmental Psychology, 21, 523–533. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.21.3.523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meehan, B. T., Hughes, J. N., & Cavell, T. A. (2003). Teacher-student relationships as compensatory resources for aggressive children. Child Development, 74, 1145–1157. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00598.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mikami, A. Y., Griggs, M. S., Reuland, M. M., & Gregory, A. (2012). Teacher practices as predictors of children’s classroom social preference. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 95–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.08.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Moore, C. C., Shoulberg, E. K., & Murray-Close, D. (2012). The protective role of teacher preference for at-risk children’s social status. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 481–493. doi: 10.1002/ab.21446.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Newgent, R. A., Lounsbery, K. L., Keller, E. A., Baker, C. R., Cavell, T. A., & Boughfman, E. M. (2009). Differential perceptions of bullying in the schools: a comparison of student, parent, teacher, school counselor, and principal reports. Journal of School Counseling, 7(38) Retrieved from http://www.jcs.montana.edu/articles/v7n38.pdf.
  55. Newman-Carlson, D., & Horne, A. M. (2004). Bully busters: a psychoeducational intervention for reducing bullying behavior in middle school students. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82, 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge, MA:Blackwell.Google Scholar
  57. Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2010). Bullying in school: evaluation and dissemination of the olweus bullying prevention program. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80, 124–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01015.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: are low-accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357–389. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.102.3.357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary to secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259–280. doi: 10.1348/026151002166442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Perry, D. G., Hodges, E. V. E., & Egan, S. K. (2001). Determinants of chronic victimization by peers: a review and new model of family influence. In J. Juvonen, & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 73–104). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  61. Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807–814. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10314-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pianta, R. C., & Stuhlman, M. W. (2004). Teacher-child relationships and children’s success in the first years of school. School Psychology Review, 33, 444–458.Google Scholar
  64. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reavis, R. D., Keane, S. P., & Calkins, S. D. (2010). Trajectories of peer victimization: the role of multiple relationships. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 303–332. doi: 10.1353/mpq.0.0055.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34(4), 244–252.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Rigby, K., & Slee, P. (1999). Suicidal ideation among adolescent school children involvement in bully-victim problems, and perceived social support. Suicide and Life-threatening Behavior, 29, 119–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Rodkin, P. C., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2003). Bullies and victims in the peer ecology: four questions for psychologists and school professionals. School Psychology Review, 32, 384–400.Google Scholar
  69. Roland, E., & Galloway, D. (2002). Classroom influences on bullying. Educational Research, 44, 299–312. doi: 10.1080/0013188022000031597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J., & Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: a review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Salmivalli, C., Huttunen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1997). Peer networks and bullying in schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 305–312. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246–458. doi: 10.1080/01650250344000488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (2000). Friendship as a moderating factor in the pathway between early harsh home environment and later victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 36, 646–662. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.5.646.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Shin, Y., & Kim, H. Y. (2008). Peer victimization in Korean preschool children: the effects of child characteristics, parenting behaviours, and teacher-child relationships. School Psychology International, 29, 590–605. doi: 10.1177/0143034308099203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Smith, J. D., Schneider, B. H., Smith, P. K., & Ananiadou, K. (2004). The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: a synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33, 547–560.Google Scholar
  77. Snell, J., MacKenzie, E., & Frey, K. (2002). Bullying prevention in elementary schools: the importance of adult leadership, peer group support, and student social-emotional skills. In M. R. Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 351–372). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  78. Spilt, J. L., Hughes, J. N., Wu, J., & Kwok, O. (2012). Dynamics of teacher–student relationships: stability and change across elementary school and the influence on children’s academic success. Child Development, 83, 1180–1195. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01761.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Taylor, A. R. (1989). Predictors of peer rejection in early elementary grades: roles of problem behavior, academic achievement, and teacher preference. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18, 360–365. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp1804_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Terry, R. (2000). Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. In A. H. N. Cillessen, & W. M. Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system (pp. 27–53). San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.Google Scholar
  81. Thompson, G. G. (1960). Children’s Groups. In P. H. Mussen (e.d.), Handbook of Research Methods in Child Development (pp. 821–853). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  82. Troop-Gordon, W., & Kopp, J. (2011). Teacher–child relationship quality and children’s peer victimization and aggressive behavior in late childhood. Social Development, 20, 536–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00604.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Troop-Gordon, W., & Kuntz, K. J. (2013). The unique and interactive contributions of peer victimization and teacher-child relationships to children’s school adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 1191–1202. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9776-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Troop-Gordon, W., & Ladd, G. W. (2013). Teachers' victimization-related beliefs and strategies: associations with students' aggressive behavior and peer victimization. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9840-y.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Troop-Gordon, W., & Quenette, A. (2010). Children’s perceptions of their teacher’s responses to students' peer harassment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 333–360. doi: 10.1353/mpq.0.0056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Twemlow, S. W., & Fonagy, P. (2005). The prevalence of teachers who bully students in schools with differeing levels of behavioral problems. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 2387–2389. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Twemlow, S. W., Fonagy, P., Sacco, F. C., & Brethour, J. R. (2006). Teachers who bully students: A hidden trauma. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 52, 187–198. doi: 10.1177/0020764006067234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Waasdorp, T., Pas, E. T., O’Brennan, L. M., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2011). A multilevel perspective on the climate of bullying: discrepancies among students, school staff, and parents. Journal of School Violence, 10, 115–132. doi: 10.1080/15388220.2010.539164.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. Wu, J., Hughes, J. N., & Kwok, O. (2010). Teacher–student relationship quality type in elementary grades: effects on trajectories for achievement and engagement. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 357–387. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2010.06.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Yeung, R., & Leadbeater, B. (2010). Adults make a differences: the protective effects of parent and teacher emotional support on emotional and behavioral problems of peer-victimized adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 80–98. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Yoneyama, S., & Naito, A. (2003). Problems with the paradigm: the school as a factor in understanding bullying (with special reference to japan). British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24, 315–330. doi: 10.1080/01425690301894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Christian Elledge
    • 1
    Email author
  • Allison R. Elledge
    • 2
  • Rebecca A. Newgent
    • 3
  • Timothy A. Cavell
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyEast Tennessee Children’s HospitalKnoxvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Counselor EducationWestern Illinois University – Quad CitiesMolineUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations