Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 38, Issue 8, pp 1109–1123 | Cite as

Interactive Links Between Theory of Mind, Peer Victimization, and Reactive and Proactive Aggression

  • Annie Renouf
  • Mara Brendgen
  • Jean R. Séguin
  • Frank Vitaro
  • Michel Boivin
  • Ginette Dionne
  • Richard E. Tremblay
  • Daniel Pérusse
Article

Abstract

This study investigated the relation between theory of mind and reactive and proactive aggression, respectively, as well as the moderating role of peer victimization in this context. The 574 participants were drawn from a longitudinal study of twins. Theory of mind was assessed before school entry, when participants were 5 years old. Reactive and proactive aggression as well as peer victimization were assessed a year later in kindergarten. Results from multilevel regression analyses revealed that low theory of mind was related to a high level of reactive aggression, but only in children who experienced average to high levels of peer victimization. In contrast, a high theory of mind was related to a high level of proactive aggression. Again, this relation was especially pronounced in children who experienced high levels of peer victimization. These findings challenge the social skills deficit view of aggression and provide support for a multidimensional perspective of aggressive behavior.

Keywords

Theory of mind Reactive and proactive aggression Peer victimization 

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Arseneault, L., Walsh, E., Trzesniewski, K., Newcombe, R., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2006). Bullying victimization uniquely contributes to adjustment problems in young children: A nationally representative cohort study. Pediatrics, 118(1), 130–138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Astington, J. W. (2001). The future of theory-of-mind research: Understanding motivational states, the role of language, and real-world consequences. Commentary on “Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief”. Child Development, 72, 685–687.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, L. A., Raine, A., Liu, J., & Jacobson, K. C. (2008). Differential genetic and environmental influences on reactive and proactive aggression in children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1265–1278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker, E. D., Boivin, M., Brendgen, M., Fontaine, N., Arseneault, L., Vitaro, F., et al. (2008). Predictive validity and early predictors of peer-victimization trajectories in preschool. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65, 1185–1192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker, E. D., Vitaro, F., Lacourse, E., Fontaine, N. M. G., Carbonneau, R., & Tremblay, R. E. (2010). Testing the developmental distinctiveness of male proactive and reactive aggression with a nested longitudinal experimental intervention. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 127–140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 59–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Boivin, M., Dionne, G., & Pérusse, D. (2006). Examining genetic and environmental effects on reactive versus proactive aggression. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1299–1312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Camodeca, M., Goossens, F. A., Meerum, M., & Schuengel, C. (2002). Bullying and victimization among school-age children: Stability and links to proactive and reactive aggression. Social Development, 11, 332–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Capage, L., & Watson, A. C. (2001). Individual differences in theory of mind, aggressive behavior, and social skills in young children. Early Education and Development, 12, 613–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Early adolescents’ participation in bullying: Is ToM involved? Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(1), 138–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 466–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carey, G. (2005). The intra-class covariance matrix. Behavior Genetics, 3, 667–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cassidy, K. W., Werner, R. S., Rourke, M., Zubernis, L. S., & Balaraman, G. (2003). The relationship between psychological understanding and positive social behaviors. Social Development, 12, 198–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cassidy, K. W., Fineberg, D. S., Brown, K., & Perkins, A. (2005). Theory of mind may be contagious, but you don’t catch it from your twin. Child Development, 76, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Connor, D. F., Steingard, R. J., Anderson, J. J., & Melloni, R. H. (2003). Gender differences in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 33, 279–294.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Côté, S. M., Vaillancourt, T., Barker, E. D., Nagin, D., & Tremblay, R. E. (2007). The joint development of physical and indirect aggression: Predictors of continuity and change during childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 37–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 993–1002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1999). ‘Superiority’ is in the eye of the beholder: A comment of Sutton, Smith and Swettenham. Social Development, 8, 128–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cutting, A. L., & Dunn, J. (2002). The cost of understanding other people: Social cognition predicts young children’s sensitivity to criticism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 849–860.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dale, P. S., Simonoff, E., Bishop, D. V. M., Eley, T. C., Oliver, B., Price, T. S., et al. (1998). Genetic influence on language delay in 2-year-olds. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 324–328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Day, D. M., Bream, L. A., & Paul, A. (1992). Proactive and reactive aggression: An analysis of subtypes based on teacher perceptions. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 21, 210–217.Google Scholar
  24. Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146–1158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., Pettit, G. S., & Price, J. M. (1990). Peer status and aggression in boys’ groups: Developmental and contextual analyses. Child Development, 61(5), 1289–1309.Google Scholar
  26. Dodge, K. A., Landsford, J. E., Burks, V. S., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., Fontaine, R., et al. (2003). Peer rejection and social information-processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Child Development, 74, 374–393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dodge, K. A., Lochman, J. E., Harnish, J. D., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (1997). Reactive and proactive aggression in school children and psychiatrically impaired chronically assaultive youth. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 37–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Dunn, J. (1995). Children as psychologists: The later correlates of individual differences in understanding of emotions and other minds. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dunn, J. (2000). Mind-reading, emotion understanding, and relationships. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(2), 142–144.Google Scholar
  30. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test—revised manual. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  31. Dunn, L. M., Theriault-Whalen, C. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Échelle de Vocabulaire en Images Peabody. Adaptation française du Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Manuel pour les formes A et B. Toronto, Ontario, CANADA: PSYCAN.Google Scholar
  32. Egan, S. K., Monson, T. C., & Perry, D. G. (1998). Social-cognitive influences on change in aggression over time. Developmental Psychology, 34, 996–1006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Flavell, J. H., Flavell, E. R., & Green, F. L. (1983). Development of the appearance-reality distinction. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 95–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Attachment and Reflective function: Their role in self-organization. In P. Fonagy, G. Gergely, E. Jurist, & M. Target (Eds.), Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self (pp. 23–64). New-York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  35. Forget-Dubois, N., Perusse, D., Turecki, G., Girard, A., Billette, J. M., Rouleau, G., et al. (2003). Diagnosing zygosity in infant twins: Parent report, DNA analysis, and chorionicity. Twin Research, 6, 479–485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gibb, B. E., & Coles, M. E. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability-stress models of psychopathology: A developmental perspective. In B. L. Hankin & J. R. Z. Abela (Eds.), Developmental of psychopathology: A vulnerability-stress perspective. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Goldsmith, H. H. (1991). A zygosity questionnaire for young twins: A research note. Behavior Genetics, 21, 257–269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Gopnik, A., & Astington, J. W. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development, 59, 26–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Happé, F., & Frith, U. (1996). Theory of mind and social impairment in children with conduct disorder. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 385–398.Google Scholar
  40. Harvey, R. J., Fletcher, J., & French, D. J. (2001). Social reasoning: A source of influence on aggression. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 447–469.Google Scholar
  41. Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (2007). Aggression and adaptation: The bright side to bad behavior. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  42. Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  43. Hubbard, J. A., Dodge, K. A., Cillessen, A. H., Coie, J. D., & Schwartz, D. (2001). The dyadic nature of social information processing in boys’ reactive and proactive aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 268–280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hubbard, J. A., Smithmyer, C. M., Ramsden, S. R., Parker, E. H., Flanagan, K. D., Dearing, K. F., et al. (2002). Observational, physiological, and self-report measures of children’s anger: Relations to reactive versus proactive aggression. Child Development, 73, 1101–1118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (2006). Behavioural problems in 2-year-olds: Links with individual differences in theory of mind, executive function and harsh parenting. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 488–497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (2007). Positive and protective: Effects of early theory of mind on problem behaviors in at-risk preschoolers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 1025–1032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Hughes, C., & Leekam, S. (2004). What are the links between theory of mind and social relations? Review, reflection, and new directions for studies of typical and atypical development. Social Development, 13, 590–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Katsurada, E., & Sugawara, A. I. (1998). The relationship between hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in preschoolers. Early Childhood Research Quaterly, 13, 623–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kochenderfer, B. J., & Ladd, G. W. (1996). Peer victimization: Manifestations and relations to school adjustment in kindergarten. Journal of School Psychology, 34, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kreft, I. G. G., de Leeuw, J., & Aiken, L. S. (1995). The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Laffey-Ardley, S., & Thorpe, K. (2006). Being opposite: Is there advantage for social competence and friendships in being an opposite-sex twin? Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 131–140.Google Scholar
  52. Lalonde, C. E., & Chandler, M. J. (1995). False belief understanding goes to school: On the social-emotional consequences of coming early or late to a first theory of mind. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lamarche, V., Brendgen, M., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., Dionne, G., & Pérusse, D. (2007). Do friends’ characteristics moderate the prospective links between peer victimization and reactive and proactive aggression? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 665–680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lemelin, J.-P., Boivin, M., Forget-Dubois, N., Dionne, G., Séguin, J. R., Brendgen, M., et al. (2007). The genetic-environmental etiology of cognitive school readiness and later academic achievement in early childhood. Child Development, 78(6), 1855–1869.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Little, T. D., Jones, S. M., Henrich, C. C., & Hawley, P. H. (2003). Disentangling the “whys” from the “whats” of aggressive behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McAuliffe, M. D., Hubbard, J. A., Rubin, R. M., Morrow, M. T., & Dearing, K. F. (2007). Reactive and proactive aggression: Stability of constructs and relations to correlates. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167, 365–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78, 622–646.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2004). Mplus user’s guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  59. Orobio de Castro, B. M., Veerman, J. W., Koops, W., Bosch, J. D., & Monshouwer, H. J. (2002). Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 73, 916–934.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Pellegrini, A. D. (1998). Bullies and victims in school: A review and call for research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pelletier, J., & Astington, J. W. (2004). Action, consciousness and theory of mind: Children’s ability to coordinate story characters’ actions and thoughts. Early Education and Development, 15, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Brown, M. M. (1988). Early family experience, social problem solving patterns, and children’s social competence. Child Development, 59, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Polman, H., de Castro, B. O., Koops, W., van Boxtel, H. W., & Merk, W. W. (2007). A meta-analysis of the distinction between reactive and proactive aggression in children and adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 522–535.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Poulin, F., & Boivin, M. (2000). Reactive and proactive aggression: Evidence of a two-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 12, 115–122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Pulkkinen, L., Vaalamo, I., Hietala, R., Kaprio, J., & Rose, R. J. (2003). Peer reports of adaptive behaviour in twins and singletons: Is twinship a risk or an advantage? Twin Research, 6, 106–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Renouf, A., Brendgen, M., Parent, S., Vitaro, F., Zelazo, P., Boivin, M., et al. (2010). Relations between theory of mind and indirect and physical aggression in kindergarten: Evidence of the moderating role of prosocial behaviors. Early view: Social Development.Google Scholar
  67. Rhee, S., & Waldman, I. D. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 29, 490–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Ruffman, T., Slade, L., Rowlandson, K., Rumsey, C., & Garnham, A. (2003). How language relates to belief, desire, and emotion understanding. Cognitive Development, 18, 139–158.Google Scholar
  70. Runions, K. C., & Keating, D. P. (2007). Young children’s social information processing: Family antecedents and behavioural correlates. Developmental Psychology, 43, 838–849.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Sabbagh, M. A., Xu, F., Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Lee, K. (2006). The development of executive functioning and theory of mind. Psychological Science, 17, 74–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Salmivalli, C., & Helteenvuori, T. (2007). Reactive, but not proactive aggression predicts victimization among boys. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 198–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Salmivalli, C., & Nieminen, E. (2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. SantéQuébec, Jetté, M., Desrosiers, H., & Tremblay, R. E. (1998). “In 2001...I’ll be 5 years old!” Survey of 5-month old infants. Preliminary report of the Longitudinal Study of Child Development in Québec: Bibliothèque Nationale du Québec.Google Scholar
  75. Schippel, P. L., Vasey, M. W., Cravens-Brown, L. M., & Bretveld, R. A. (2003). Suppressed attention to rejection, ridicule, and failure cues: A unique correlate of reactive but not proactive aggression in youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 40–55.Google Scholar
  76. Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., Hubbard, J. A., Cillessen, A. H. N., Lemerise, E. A., et al. (1998). Social-cognitive and behavioural correlates of aggression and victimization in boys’ play groups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 431–440.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Sutton, J., Reeves, M., & Keogh, E. (2000). Disruptive behaviour, avoidance of responsibility and theory of mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Talwar, V., Gordon, H. M., & Lee, K. (2007). Lying in the elementary school years: Verbal deception and its relation to second-order belief understanding. Developmental Psychology, 43, 804–810.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Thorpe, K. (2003). Twins and friendship. Twin Research, 6, 532–535.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Vitaro, F., & Brendgen, M. (2005). Proactive and reactive aggression: A developmental perspective. In R. E. Tremblay, W. M. Hartup, & J. Archer (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  82. Vitaro, F., Gendreau, P. L., Tremblay, R. E., & Oligny, P. (1998). Reactive and proactive aggression differentially predict later conduct problems. Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2002). Reactively and proactively aggressive children: Antecedent and subsequent characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 495–506.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Vitaro, F., Barker, E. D., Boivin, M., Brendgen, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2006). Do early difficult temperament and harsh parenting differentially predict reactive and proactive aggression? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 685–695.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Waschbusch, D. A., Willoughby, M. T., & Pelham, W. E. (1998). Criterion validity and the utility of reactive and proactive aggression: Comparisons to Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, and other measures of functioning. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 396–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Zelazo, P. D., Jacques, S., Burack, J., & Frye, D. (2002). The relation between theory of mind and rule use: Evidence from persons with autism-spectrum disorders. Infant and Child Development, 11, 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annie Renouf
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mara Brendgen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jean R. Séguin
    • 2
    • 3
  • Frank Vitaro
    • 2
    • 4
  • Michel Boivin
    • 2
    • 5
  • Ginette Dionne
    • 5
  • Richard E. Tremblay
    • 2
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
  • Daniel Pérusse
    • 2
    • 9
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Quebec at MontrealMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Ste-Justine Hospital Research CenterMontréalCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MontrealMontrealCanada
  4. 4.School of PsychoeducationUniversity of MontrealMontrealCanada
  5. 5.Department of PsychologyLaval UniversityQuebecCanada
  6. 6.Departments of Psychology, and PediatricsUniversity of MontrealMontrealCanada
  7. 7.International Laboratory for Child and Adolescent Mental Health Development, INSERM U669France and University of MontrealMontrealCanada
  8. 8.School of Public Health and Population ScienceUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
  9. 9.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of MontrealMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations