Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Active Defending and Passive Bystanding Behavior in Bullying: The Role of Personal Characteristics and Perceived Peer Pressure

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology volume 38, pages 815–827 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

This study examined the role of pro-victim attitudes, personal responsibility, coping responses to observations of bullying, and perceived peer normative pressure in explaining defending the victim and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. A total of 462 Italian early adolescents (mean age = 13.4 years, SD = 9 months) participated in the study. The behaviors were measured through two informants: each individual student and the teachers. The findings of a series of hierarchical regressions showed that, regardless of the informant, problem solving coping strategies and perceived peer normative pressure for intervention were positively associated with active help towards a bullied peer and negatively related to passivity. In contrast, distancing strategies were positively associated with passive bystanding, whereas they were negatively associated with teacher-reported defending behavior. Moreover, self-reported defending behavior was positively associated with personal responsibility for intervention, but only under conditions of low perceived peer pressure. Finally, the perception of peer pressure for intervention buffered the negative influence of distancing on passive bystanding tendencies. Future directions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbin, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreou, E., & Metallidou, P. (2004). The relationship of academic and social cognition to behavior in bullying situations among Greek primary school children. Educational Psychology, 24, 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1, pp. 45–103). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belacchi, C. (2008). I ruoli dei partecipanti nel bullismo: una nuova proposta [Participants Roles in bullying: a new proposal]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 4, 885–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., Clasen, D. R., & Eicher, S. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22, 521–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, W., Newcomb, A., & Hartup, W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camodeca, M., & Goossens, F. A. (2005). Children’s opinions on effective strategies to cope with bullying: the importance of bullying role and perspective. Educational Research, 47, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18, 140–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, I. W., & Cornell, D. G. (2008). Differences between persistent and desistent middle school bullies. School Psychology International, 29, 442–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Causey, D. L., & Dubow, E. F. (1992). Development of a self-report coping measure for elementary school children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 21, 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, H. (2000). Bystanding or standing by: gender issues in coping with bullying in English schools. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W. M., Pepler, D. J., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21, 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children’s future social adjustment. Child Development, 67, 2317–2327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L., Holt, M. K., & Henkel, R. R. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 205–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variable and measurement error: algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G. (2006a). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: what’s wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32, 528–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G. (2006b). Bullying as a social process: the role of group membership in students’ perception of inter-group aggression at school. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G. (2007). Who is blameworthy? Social identity and inter-group bullying. School Psychology International, 28, 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G. (2008). Associations between bullying, psychosomatic symptoms, emotional and behavioral problems. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 44, 492–497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2009). Association between bullying and psychosomatic problems: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 123, 1059–1065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33, 467–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2008a). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 93–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., Borghi, F., & Franzoni, L. (2008b). The role of bystanders in students’ perception of bullying and sense of safety. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 617–638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griesler, P. C., & Kandel, D. B. (1998). Ethnic differences in correlates of adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 23, 167–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawker, D. S., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial adjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 41, 441–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazler, R. (1996). Bystanders: an overlooked factor in peer on peer abuse. The Journal for the Professional Counsellor, 11, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. A., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modelling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose, P. E. (2008). ModGraph-I: A programme to compute cell means for the graphical display of moderational analyses: The internet version, Version 2.0. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, J., & Galvan, A. (2008). Peer influence in involuntary social groups: Lessons from research on bullying. In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 225–244). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, S. M., & Smith, P. K. (2003). The use of coping strategies by Danish children classed as bullies, victims, bully/victims, and not involved, in response to different (hypothetical) types of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 479–488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W. (2003). Probing the adaptive significance of children’s behavior and relationships in the school context: A child-by-environment perspective. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child behavior and development (pp. 43–104). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J., & Frydenberg, E. (2005). The role of peer bystanders in school bullying: positive steps towards promoting peaceful schools. Theory into Practice, 44, 329–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menesini, E., & Camodeca, M. (2008). Shame and guilt as behaviour regulators: relationships with bullying, victimization and prosocial behaviour. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menesini, E., & Gini, G. (2000). Il bullismo come processo di gruppo: adattamento e validazione del questionario “Ruoli dei partecipanti” alla popolazione italiana [Bullying as a group process: Adaptation and validation of the Participant Role Questionnaire to the Italian population]. Età Evolutiva, 66, 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menesini, E., Sanchez, V., Fonzi, A., Ortega, R., Costabile, A., & Lo Feudo, G. (2003). Moral emotions and bullying: a cross-national comparison of differences between bullies, victims and outsiders. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 515–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school. What we know and what we can do. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2000). An empirical comparison of methods of sampling aggression and victimization in school settings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 360–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinstein, M. J., & Dodge, K. A. (2008). Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. New York: The Guilford Press.

  • Rigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26, 425–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1993). Dimensions of interpersonal relation among Australian children and implications for psychological well-being. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 33–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviors associated with bullying in schools. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Karhunen, J., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1996a). How do the victims respond to bullying? Aggressive Behavior, 22, 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996b). Bullying as a group process: participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. H. (2000). Friends and enemies: Peer relations in childhood. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 57–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., Shu, S., & Madsen, K. (2001). Characteristics of victims of school bullying: Developmental changes in coping strategies and skills. In S. Graham & J. Juvonen (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 332–351). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padua, via Venezia, 8, 35131, Padova, Italy

    Tiziana Pozzoli & Gianluca Gini

Authors
  1. Tiziana Pozzoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gianluca Gini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiziana Pozzoli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pozzoli, T., Gini, G. Active Defending and Passive Bystanding Behavior in Bullying: The Role of Personal Characteristics and Perceived Peer Pressure. J Abnorm Child Psychol 38, 815–827 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9

Keywords

search

Navigation