Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 131–142 | Cite as

A Randomized Trial of Two Promising Computer-Based Interventions for Students with Attention Difficulties

  • David L. Rabiner
  • Desiree W. Murray
  • Ann T. Skinner
  • Patrick S. Malone
Article

Abstract

Few studies have examined whether attention can be improved with training, even though attention difficulties adversely affect academic achievement. The present study was a randomized-controlled trial evaluating the impact of Computerized Attention Training (CAT) and Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) on attention and academic performance in 77 inattentive first graders. Students receiving either intervention were more likely than controls to show a moderate decline in teacher rated attention problems in first grade. Students receiving CAI also showed gains in reading fluency and in teacher ratings of academic performance. Intervention effects for attention were absent by second grade largely because attention problems declined in all groups. However, post hoc analyses indicated potential longer-term benefits for children with 6 or more inattentive symptoms at baseline. Persistent attention problems were associated with poorer academic performance in multiple domains. Results provide initial evidence that CAT and CAI can improve children’s attention in the classroom - and support additional studies to determine whether more clinically significant benefits are attainable.

Keywords

Attention ADHD Academic achievement Attention training Computer-assisted instruction 

References

  1. Barkley, R. (2007). School interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: where to from here? School Psychology Review, 36, 279–286.Google Scholar
  2. Barkley, R., Fischer, M., Smallish, L., & Fletcher, K. (2006). Young adult outcome of hyperactive children: Adaptive functioning in major life activities. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 45, 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellucci, D. M., Glaberman, K., & Haslam, N. (2003). The effectiveness of computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation for patients with chronic mental illness. Schizophrenia Research, 59, 225–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cantwell, D. P., & Baker, L. (1991). Association between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and learning disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 88–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarfield, J., & Stoner, G. (2005). Research brief: The effects of computerized reading instruction on the academic performance of students identified with ADHD. School Psychology Review, 34, 246–254.Google Scholar
  6. Conners, C. K. (1997). Conners’ rating scales-revised. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-health systems.Google Scholar
  7. De Long-Cotty & Levenson, T. (2004). The impact of destination reading: summary of research findings. Retrieved September 3, 2005, from the WestEd web site: http://hmlt.hmco.com/downloads/Research/
  8. Din, F. (1996). Computer-assisted instruction, students’ off-task behavior and their achievement. Education and Treatment of Children, 19(2), 170–183.Google Scholar
  9. Dittman, C. (2008). An investigation of the concurrent and predictive contribution of ADHD- like behaviours and phonological processing to early word reading development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Queensland, Australia: The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  10. DuPaul, G. J. (2007). School-based interventions for students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: current status and future directions. School Psychology Review, 36, 183–194.Google Scholar
  11. DuPaul, G. J., & Eckert, T. L. (1998). Academic interventions for students with attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 14, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DuPaul, G. J., Rapport, M. D., & Perriello, L. M. (1991). Teacher ratings of academic skills: the development of the Academic Performance Rating Scale. School Psychology Review, 20, 284–300.Google Scholar
  13. DuPaul, G. J., Stoner, G., & O’Reilly, M. J. (2002). Best practices in classroom interventions for attention problems. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology, vol. 2 (pp. 1115–1127). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  14. Good, R., Gruba, J., & Kaminski, R. (2002). Best practices in using dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (DIBELS) in an outcomes-driven model. Best practices in school psychology IV (Vol. 1, Vol. 2) (pp. 699–720). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  15. Hintze, J. M., Ryan, A. L., & Stoner, G. (2003). Concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy of the dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills and the comprehensive test of phonological processing. School Psychology Review, 32, 541–556.Google Scholar
  16. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman brief intelligence test, 2nd edn (KBIT-2). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Kerns, K. A., Eso, K., & Thomson, J. (1999). Investigation of a direct intervention for improving attention in young children with ADHD. Developmental Neuropsychology, 16, 273–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kleiman, G., Humphrey, M., & Lindsay, P. H. (1981). Microcomputers and hyperactive children. Creative Computing, 7, 93–94.Google Scholar
  19. Kotwal, D. B., Burns, W. J., & Montgomery, D. D. (1996). Computer-assisted cognitive training for ADHD. Behavior Modification, 20, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lillie, D. L., Hannun, W. H., & Stuck, G. B. (1989). Computers and effective instruction. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  21. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Mautone, J. A., DuPaul, G. J., & Jitendra, A. K. (2005). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance and classroom behavior of children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9, 301–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Merrell, C., & Tymms, P. B. (2001). Inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsiveness: Their impact on academic achievement and progress. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 43–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Merrell, C., & Tymms, P. B. (2005). Rasch analysis of inattentive, hyperactive, and impulsive behavior in young children and the link with academic achievement. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6, 1–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. MTA Cooperative Group. (1999). A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strategies for ADHD. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 1073–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MTA Cooperative Group. (2009). The MTA at 8 years: prospective follow-up of children treated for combined-type ADHD in a multisite study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48, 484–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murphy, K., Barkley, R. A., & Bush, T. (2002). Young adults with ADHD: subtype differences in comorbidity, educational, and clinical history. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190, 147–157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2009). Mplus user’s guide (v5.2). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  29. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: teaching children to read. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.Google Scholar
  30. Ota, K., & DuPaul, G. (2002). Task engagement and mathematics performance in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: effects of supplemental computer instruction. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 242–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pappadopulos, E., Jensen, P., Chait, A., Arnold, L., Swanson, J., Greenhill, L., et al. (2009). Medication adherence in the MTA: saliva methylphenidate samples versus parent report and mediating effect of concomitant behavioral treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 48, 501–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Posner, M. I., Sheese, B. E., Odludas, Y., & Tang, Y. (2006). Analyzing and shaping human attentional networks. Neural Networks, 19, 1422–1429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rabiner, D. L., Coie, J. D., & CPPRG. (2000). Early attention problems and children’s reading achievement: a longitudinal investigation. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 859–867.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rabiner, D. L., Murray, D. W., Schmid, L., & Malone, P. (2004). An exploration of the relationship between ethnicity, attention problems, and academic achievement. School Psychology Review, 33, 498–509.Google Scholar
  35. Rabiner, D. L., Malone, P. S., & CPPRG. (2004). The impact of tutoring on early reading achievement for children with and without attention problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 273–284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rohling, M. L., Faust, M. E., Beverly, B., & Demakis, G. (2009). Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: A meta-analytic re-examination of Cicerone et al.’s (2000, 2005) systematic reviews. Neuropsychology, 23, 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rueda, M. R., Rothbart, M. K., McCandliss, B. D., Saccomanno, L., & Posner, M. I. (2005). Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 14931–14936.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. SAS Insitute. (2007). SAS (v9.2) [software]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  39. Scheffler, R. M., Brown, T. T., Fulton, B. D., Hinshaw, S. P., Levine, P., & Stone, S. (2009). Positive association between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medication use and academic achievement during elementary school. Pediatrics, 123(5), 1273–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Semrud-Clikeman, M., Nielsen, K. H., Clinton, A., Sylvester, L., Parle, N., & Connor, R. T. (1999). An intervention approach for children with teacher- and parent-identified attentional difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 581–590.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Shalev, L., Tsal, Y., & Mevorach, C. (2007). Computerized progressive attentional training (CPAT) program: effective direct intervention for children with ADHD. Child Neuropsychology, 13(4), 382–388.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Slate, E., Meyer, T. L., Burns, W. J., & Montgomery, D. D. (1998). Computerized cognitive training for severely disturbed children with ADHD. Behavior Modification, 22(3), 415–437.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  44. Swanson, J. M., Kraemer, H. C., Hinshaw, S. P., Arnold, L. E., Conners, C. K., Abikoff, H. B., et al. (2001). Clinical relevance of the primary findings of the MTA: Success rates based on severity of ADHD and ODD symptoms at the end of treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 168–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xu, C., Reid, R., & Steckelberg, A. (2002). Technology applications for children with ADHD: assessing the empirical support. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 224–248.Google Scholar
  46. Weisz, J. R., & Gray, J. S. (2008). Evidence-based psychotherapy for children and adolescents: data from the present and a model for the future. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 13, 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wolraich, M. L., Hannah, J. N., Baumgaertel, A., & Feurer, I. D. (1998). Examination of DSM-IV criteria for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a county-wide sample. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 19, 192–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • David L. Rabiner
    • 1
  • Desiree W. Murray
    • 3
  • Ann T. Skinner
    • 2
  • Patrick S. Malone
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Child and Family Policy/Dept. of Psychology & NeuroscienceDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Center for Child and Family PolicyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Duke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations