Advertisement

Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

, Volume 49, Issue 10, pp 1035–1041 | Cite as

Comparison of the oxygen reduction mechanisms in a GBCO–SDC-impregnated cathode and a GBCO cathode

  • Yongxin Tan
  • Rong Wang
  • Xiaohu Hu
  • Huanhuan Zhang
  • Yu Lei
  • Sijia Zhu
  • Yifei Zheng
  • Xuejiao Xu
  • Hua ZhangEmail author
Research Article
  • 48 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Fuel cells

Abstract

In this paper, a GdBaCo2O5+δ–Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 (GBCO–SDC) composite cathode was prepared by the impregnation method with GdBaCo2O5+δ (GBCO) as the impregnating phase and Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 (SDC) as the cathode skeleton. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis showed a good chemical compatibility between GBCO and SDC, and there were no obvious impurities at high temperature. The particle size of GBCO was approximately 80 nm. The continuous GBCO phase was deposited on the surface of porous SDC backbones, which greatly improved the electrochemical activity of the cathode. The polarization resistance of GBCO–SDC-impregnated cathode was 0.50 Ω cm2 at 600 °C, which was only ~ 28.6% of that of pure GBCO cathode. The oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at GBCO cathode mainly involved the adsorption–dissociation of oxygen molecules and charge-transfer process of oxygen atoms. The two ORR rate-controlling steps were the adsorption–dissociation process at 500–600 °C and the charge-transfer processes at 600–700 °C, respectively. The oxygen reduction reaction at GBCO–SDC-impregnated cathode mainly involved the diffusion of oxygen ions through the three phase boundaries and the charge transfer of oxygen atoms, in which the charge-transfer process was always the ORR rate-controlling step.

Graphic abstract

Keywords

Solid oxide fuel cells Impregnated cathode Three phase boundaries Oxygen reduction reaction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was based a Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

References

  1. 1.
    Brus G, Iwai H, Mozdzierz M et al (2017) Combining structural, electrochemical, and numerical studies to investigate the relation between microstructure and the stack performance. J Appl Electrochem 47:979–989.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-017-1099-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cepeda-Sanchez NM, Fuentes AF, Lopez-Cota FA, Rodriguez-Reyes M, Diaz-Guillen JA (2015) Mechanochemical synthesis and electrical properties of Gd2Hf2-xZrxO7 solid electrolytes for their use in SOFC’s. J Appl Electrochem 45:1231–1237.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-015-0828-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang C, Tomov RI, Mitchell-Williams TB, Kumar RV, Glowacki BA (2017) Inkjet printing infiltration of Ni-Gd:CeO2 anodes for low temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J Appl Electrochem 47:1227–1238.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-017-1114-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giddey S, Badwal SPS, Kulkarni A, Munnings C (2012) A comprehensive review of direct carbon fuel cell technology. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38:360–399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2012.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang JJ, Yan D, Huang W et al (2018) Improvement on durability and thermal cycle performance for solid oxide fuel cell stack with external manifold structure. Energy 149:903–913.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhao F, Wang ZY, Liu MF, Zhang L, Xia CR, Chen FL (2008) Novel nano-network cathodes for solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 185:13–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.07.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim JH, Manthiram A (2015) Layered LnBaCo(2)O(5+delta) perovskite cathodes for solid oxide fuel cells: an overview and perspective. J Mater Chem A 3:24195–24210.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta06212h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim JH, Manthiram A (2008) LnBaCo(2)O(5+delta) oxides as cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 155:B385–B390.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2839028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang K, Ge L, Ran R, Shao ZP, Liu SM (2008) Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of cation-ordered LnBaCo(2)O(5+delta) as materials of oxygen permeation membranes and cathodes of SOFCs. Acta Mater 56:4876–4889.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adler SB, Lane JA, Steele BCH (1996) Electrode kinetics of porous mixed-conducting oxygen electrodes. J Electrochem Soc 143:3554–3564.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1837252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Manthiram A, Kim JH, Kim YN, Lee KT (2011) Crystal chemistry and properties of mixed ionic-electronic conductors. J Electroceram 27:93–107.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10832-011-9635-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou QJ, Wang F, Shen Y, He TM (2010) Performances of LnBaCo(2)O(5+x)-Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 composite cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 195:2174–2181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jin FJ, Li JH, Wang Y et al (2018) Evaluation of Fe and Mn co-doped layered perovskite PrBaCo2/3Fe2/3Mn1/2O5+delta as a novel cathode for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cell. Ceram Int 44:22489–22496.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fan LD, Zhu B, Su PC, He CX (2018) Nanomaterials and technologies for low temperature solid oxide fuel cells: recent advances, challenges and opportunities. Nano Energy 45:148–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ding D, Li XX, Lai SY, Gerdes K, Liu ML (2014) Enhancing SOFC cathode performance by surface modification through infiltration. Energy Environ Sci 7:552–575.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee42926a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vohs JM, Gorte RJ (2009) High-performance SOFC cathodes prepared by infiltration. Adv Mater 21:943–956.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200802428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang Y, Zhang H, Chen FL, Xia CR (2012) Electrochemical characteristics of nano-structured PrBaCo2O5+x cathodes fabricated with ion impregnation process. J Power Sources 203:34–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.11.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu HM, Zhang H, Chu AM (2016) An investigation of oxygen reduction mechanism in nano-sized LSCF-SDC composite cathodes. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:22415–22421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee D, Lee I, Jeon Y, Song R (2005) Characterization of scandia stabilized zirconia prepared by glycine nitrate process and its performance as the electrolyte for IT-SOFC. Solid State Ion 176:1021–1025.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2005.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wei B, Lu Z, Wei TS, Jia DC, Huang XQ, Zhang YH, Miao JP, Su WH (2011) Nanosized Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 infiltrated GdBaCo2O5+delta cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 36:6151–6159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chang AM, Skinner SJ, Kilner JA (2006) Electrical properties of GdBaCo2O5+x for ITSOFC applications. Solid State Ion 177:2009–2011.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2006.05.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ni Q, Chen H, Ge L, Yu SC, Guo LC (2017) Investigation of La1-xSmx-ySryCoO3-delta cathode for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 349:130–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li YH, Gemmen R, Liu XB (2010) Oxygen reduction and transportation mechanisms in solid oxide fuel cell cathodes. J Power Sources 195:3345–3358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials Science and EngineeringNanjing Tech UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations