Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

, Volume 48, Issue 6, pp 713–723 | Cite as

Enhancing PEM water electrolysis efficiency by reducing the extent of Ti gas diffusion layer passivation

  • T. BystronEmail author
  • M. Vesely
  • M. Paidar
  • G. Papakonstantinou
  • K. Sundmacher
  • B. Bensmann
  • R. Hanke-Rauschenbach
  • K. Bouzek
Research Article


Proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEM WE) suffers from several issues, such as the high cost and low stability of the electrolyser unit components. This is especially evident for an anode polarised to a high potential and in contact with an acidic membrane. Such a combination is detrimental to the vast majority of electron-conducting materials. Nowadays Ti (possessing a protective passive layer on its surface) is used as the construction material of an anode gas diffusion layer. Since the passivation layer itself is non-/semiconducting, an excessive degree of passivation leads to high surface contact resistance and to energy losses during PEM WE operation. This problem is usually solved by coating the Ti surface with precious metals. This leads to a further increase of the already very high cell investment costs. In this work an alternative method based on appropriate Ti etching (in acid) is presented. The (surface) composition of the samples treated was investigated using SEM, X-ray fluorescence and diffraction and photoelectron spectroscopy. TiHx was found in the subsurface layer. This was responsible for preventing excessive passivation of the Ti metal. The superior performance of the etched Ti gas diffusion layer (compared to non-etched) in a PEM water electrolyser was confirmed during an (> 100 h) experiment with current densities of up to 1 A cm− 2. Using the described treatment the surface contact resistance was substantially reduced and its increase during PEM WE operation was largely suppressed. As this method is very simple and cheap, it has tremendous potential for improving PEM WE process efficiency.

Graphical Abstract


PEM water electrolysis Titanium passivation Titanium hydride Photoelectron spectroscopy Surface contact resistance Etching 



Financial support of this work by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic within the framework of Project No. 15-02407J and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grant no. HA6841/2-1 and no. SU189/7-1, is gratefully acknowledged. Part of the material characterisation experiments was performed utilising instrumentation financed by the Operational Programme Prague—Competitiveness (CZ.2.16/3.1.00/24501) and the “National Program of Sustainability” (NPU I LO1613) MSMT-43760/2015.


  1. 1.
    Carmo M, Fritz DL, Mergel J, Stolten D (2013) A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:4901–4934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paidar M, Fateev V, Bouzek K (2016) Membrane electrolysis—history, current status and perspective. Electrochim Acta 209:737–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barreto L, Makihira A, Riahi K (2002) The hydrogen economy in the 21st century: a sustainable development scenario. Int J Hydrog Energy 28:267–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bertuccioli L, Chan A, Hart D, Lehner F, Madden B, Standen E (2014) Development of water electrolysis in the European Union. Fuel cells and hydrogen Joint undertaking, LausanneGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miles MH, Thomason MA (1976) Periodic Variations of overvoltages for water electrolysis in acid solutions from cyclic voltammetric studies. J Electrochem Soc 123:1459–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pourbaix M (1974) Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions, 2nd edn., National Association of Corrosion Engineers, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Draley JE (1979) Corrosion of valve metals. In: Corrosion chemistry, ACS Symposium Series. American Chemical Society, vol 89, pp 185–234.
  8. 8.
    Veiga C, Davim J, Loureiro A (2012) Properties and applications of titanium alloys: a brief review. Rev Adv Mater Sci 32:133–148Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu X, Chu PK, Ding C (2004) Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng 47:49–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sato N (1990) An overview on the passivity of metals. Corros Sci 31:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Breckenridge RG, Hosler WR (1953) Electrical properties of titanium dioxide semiconductors. Phys Rev 91:793–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lu G, Bernasek SL, Schwartz J (2000) Oxidation of a polycrystalline titanium surface by oxygen and water. Surf Sci 458:80–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee B-S, Park H-Y, Choi I, Cho MK, Kim H-J, Yoo SJ, Henkensmeier D, Kim JY, Nam SW, Park S, Lee K-Y, Jang JH (2016) Polarization characteristics of a low catalyst loading PEM water electrolyzer operating at elevated temperature. J Power Sources 309:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fateev V, Blach P, Grigoriev S, Kalinnikov A, Porembskiy V (2014) High pressure PEM electrolyzers and their application for renewable energy systems. European Hydrogen Energy Conference, Seville, Spain, 12–14 March 2014.
  15. 15.
    Stern M, Wissenberg H (1959) The Influence of noble metal alloy additions on the electrochemical and corrosion behavior of titanium. J Electrochem Soc 106:759–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beer HB (1980) The invention and industrial development of metal anodes. J Electrochem Soc 127:303C–307CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vercesi GP, Rolewicz J, Comninellis C, Hinder J (1991) Characterization of DSA-type oxygen evolving electrodes. Choice of base metal. Thermochim Acta 176:31–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thomas NT, Nobe K (1973) Corrosion behavior of titanium in HCl. Corrosion 29:188–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peters JM, Myers JR (1967) Anodic polarization behavior of titanium and titanium alloys in sulfuric acids. Corrosion 23:326–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hefny MM, Gad Allah AG, Salih SA, El-Basiouny MS (1984) Nature of the corrosion reaction at the anodic oxide film on titanium in HCl solutions. Corrosion 40:245–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mazhar AA, Heakal FE-T, Gad Allah AG (1988) Anodic behavior of titanium in aqueous media. Corrosion 44:705–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu J, Alfantazi A, Asselin E (2014) Influence of cupric, ferric, and chloride on the corrosion of titanium in Sulfuric acid solutions up to 85 °C. Corrosion 70:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Krýsa J, Mráz R, Roušar I (1997) Corrosion rate of titanium in H2SO4. Mater Chem Phys 48:64–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kong D-S, Feng Y-Y (2009) Electrochemical anodic dissolution kinetics of titanium in fluoride-containing perchloric acid solutions at open-circuit potentials. J Electrochem Soc 156:C283–C291Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    El-Mahdy GA (2007) Formation and dissolution behavior of anodic oxide films on titanium in oxalic acid solutions. Corrosion 63:299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Straumanis ME, Chen PC (1951) The corrosion of titanium in acids—the rate of dissolution in sulfuric, hydrochloric, hydrobromic and hydroiodic acids. Corrosion 7:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Straumanis ME, Chen PC (1951) The mechanism and rate of dissolution of titanium in hydrofluoric acid. J Electrochem Soc 98:234–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Caskey GR (1974) Diffusion of tritium in rutile (TiO2). Mater Sci Eng 14:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fukai Y (1991) Phase diagrams of transition metal-hydrogen systems. J Japn Inst Met 55:17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Covington LC (1979) The influence of surface condition and environment on the hydriding of titanium. Corrosion 35:378–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stout VL, Gibbons MD (1955) Gettering of gas by titanium. J Appl Phys 26:1488–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wille GW, Davis JW (1981) Hydrogen in titanium alloys. Department of EnergyGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Phillips II, Poole P, Shreir LL (1974) Hydride formation during cathodic polarization of Ti—II. Effect of temperature and pH of solution on hydride growth. Corros Sci 14:533–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Blackwood DJ, Peter LM, Bishop HE, Chalker PR, Williams DE (1989) A SIMS investigation of hydrogen penetration of titanium electrodes. Electrochim Acta 34:1401–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mizuno T, Shindo T, Morozumi T (1977) Growth rate of hydride layer produced on titanium surface by cathodic polarization. Corros Eng 26:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Briant CL, Wang ZF, Chollocoop N (2002) Hydrogen embrittlement of commercial purity titanium. Corros Sci 44:1875–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Samal S, Cho S, Park DW, Kim H (2012) Thermal characterization of titanium hydride in thermal oxidation process. Thermochim Acta 542:46–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gromov AR, Kouznetsova NN, Yudina SL, Lunin VV (1997) The investigation of titanium hydride oxidation process. J Alloys Compd 261:269–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ito M, Setoyama D, Matsunaga J, Muta H, Kurosaki K, Uno M, Yamanaka S (2006) Electrical and thermal properties of titanium hydrides. J Alloys Compd 420:25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
  41. 41.
    Diebold U, Madey TE (1996) TiO2 by XPS. Surf Sci Spectra 4:227–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kurtz RL, Henrich VE (1998) Comparison of Ti 2p core-level peaks from TiO2, Ti2O3, and Ti metal by XPS. Surf Sci Spectra 5:179–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fasmin F, Praveen BVS, Ramanathan S (2015) A kinetic model for the anodic dissolution of Ti in HF in the active and passive regions. J Electrochem Soc 162:H604-H610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lamartine BC, Haas TW, Solomon JS (1980) Characterization of TiHx and TiD0.9 surfaces: AES, ELS, SIMS and XPS studies. Appl Surf Sci 4:537–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jackman MJ, Thomas AG, Muryn C (2015) Photoelectron spectroscopy study of stoichiometric and reduced anatase TiO2(101) surfaces: the effect of subsurface defects on water adsorption at near-ambient pressures. J Phys Chem C 119:13682–13690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Moulder JF, Stickle WF, Sobol PE, Bomben KD (1992) Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, A Reference Book of Standard Spectra for Identification and Interpretation of XPS Data. Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Eden Prairie, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fuentes GG, Elizalde E, Yubero F, Sanz JM (2002) Electron inelastic mean free path for Ti, TiC, TiN and TiO2 as determined by quantitative reflection electron energy-loss spectroscopy. Surf Interface Anal 33:230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Inorganic TechnologyUniversity of Chemistry and Technology PraguePrague 6Czech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Organic TechnologyUniversity of Chemistry and Technology PraguePrague 6Czech Republic
  3. 3.Department Process Systems EngineeringMax Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical SystemsMagdeburgGermany
  4. 4.Chair of Process Systems EngineeringOtto-von-Guericke- University MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
  5. 5.Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität HannoverHanoverGermany

Personalised recommendations