Skip to main content
Log in

Alternating current electrical field effects on lettuce (Lactuca sativa) growing in hydroponic culture with and without cadmium contamination

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of a 10 Hz alternating current (10 Hz 1 V cm−1) and a 50 Hz alternating current (50 Hz 1 V cm−1) on the lettuce plant (Lactuca sativa) growing in a hydroponic (soil-free) culture. Thirty lettuce plants were pre-germinated, and then 15 of them were treated with cadmium solution (CdCl2) of 5 mg/L in concentration. Ten plants (five plants with Cd and five plants without Cd) were subjected to a 10 Hz alternating current (AC) electrical field; 10 plants were subjected to a 50 Hz AC field. The rest of the plants were used as a control. The lettuce plants were harvested after a growth of 60 days. The chlorophyll content, biomass and metal content of the lettuce plants were determined. The biomass of the plants growing in non-contaminated medium was 28 and 106% higher under the 10 and the 50 Hz AC fields respectively compared to the control. Although the plant biomass was reduced by the presence of Cd in the growth medium, the biomass of the plants growing in Cd contaminated medium was 40 and 63% higher respectively for 10 and 50 Hz AC field compared to the plant growing in Cd contaminated medium without electrical treatment. Increased uptake of Cd in the plant shoot was found with the 50 Hz AC field. Significant accumulation and uptake of Cu in plant roots and shoots was found under both electrical treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jackman S, Maini G, Sharman A et al (1999) Enzym Microb Technol 24:316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Luo Q, Wang H, Zhang X et al (2006) Chemosphere 64:415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Connor S, Lepp W, Edwards R et al (2003) Environ Monit Assess 84:141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aboughalma H, Bi R, Schlaak M (2008) J Environ Sci Health Part A 43:926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harms H, Wick LY (2006) Eng Life Sci 6:252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Welch R, Norvell W (1999) In: McLaughlin M, Singh B (eds) Cadmium in soils and plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  7. Volkov A (2006) Plant electrophysiology theory and methods. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolek J, Kozinka V (1992) Physiology of the plant root system developments in plant and soil sciences. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  9. MacKinnon R (2004) Angew Chem Int Edit 43:4265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Demidchik V, Sokolik A, Yurin V (1997) In: Volkov AG (ed) Plant electrophysiology theory and methods. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg

  11. Lemström S (2008) Electricity in agriculture and horticulture. BiblioBazaar Reproduction, LLC, Charleston

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen Z (2006) J Xianning Coll 26(3):1

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huang R, Sukprakarn S, Phavaphutanon L et al (2006) Kasetsart J 40(3):559

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muraji M, Asai T, Wataru T (1998) Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 44(2):271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stenz H, Wohlwend B, Weisenseel M (1998) Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 44:261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Blackman V, Legg A, Gregory F (1923) Proc R Soc Lond B 95:214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Murr L (1963) Nature 200:490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lichtenthaler H (1987) In: Douce R, Packer L (eds) Methods in enzymology. Academic Press, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Judy B, Lower W, Ireland F (1991) In: Gorsuch W, Lower W, Wang W et al (eds) Plants toxicity assessment, vol 2. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  20. Burton K, King J, Morgan E (1986) Water Air Soil Pollut 27:147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ebbs S, Uchil S (2008) Photosynthetica 46(1):49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cutler J, Rains S (1974) Plant Physiol 54:67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pettersson O (1976) Plant Soil 45:445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hart J, Welch R, Norvell W et al (1998) Plant Physiol 116:1413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ye H, Yang X, He B et al (2003) Acta Botanica Sinica 45(9):1030

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ran Bi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bi, R., Schlaak, M., Siefert, E. et al. Alternating current electrical field effects on lettuce (Lactuca sativa) growing in hydroponic culture with and without cadmium contamination. J Appl Electrochem 40, 1217–1223 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-010-0094-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-010-0094-x

Keywords

Navigation