Skip to main content
Log in

Time averaged concentration calculations in pulse electrochemical machining

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simulation of the species concentrations during the Pulse Electrochemical Machining (PECM) process can provide information on system design and guidelines for practical use. In detailed numerical calculations the concentrations will be calculated simultaneously with the temperature due to mutual dependencies. The pulses that are applied to the PECM system have to be described on a time scale that can be orders of magnitude smaller than the physical time scales in the system. If the full detail of the applied pulses has to be taken into account, the time accurate calculation of the variables distributions evolutions in PECM can become a computationally very expensive procedure. In previous work (Smets et al. J Appl Electrochem 37(11):1345, 2007), a time averaging approach was introduced. Performing this, the timesteps used during the calculations are no longer dictated by the pulse characteristics. Using this approach, computationally very cheap, yet satisfying results can be obtained. This work focuses on the behaviour of the concentration evolution. The concentration and the temperature calculation have different requirements for optimal approximated calculations, and a compromise has to be found between them. An analysis is performed on a simplified model, which provides useful guidelines during simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

c :

Concentration (mol m−3)

\( \overline c \) :

Averaged concentration (mol m−3)

\( \tilde c \) :

Concentration ripple (mol m−3)

c decay :

Concentration decaying component (mol m−3)

D :

Diffusion coefficient (m2 s−1)

E :

Error function (%)

F :

Faraday constant (=96,485 C mol−1)

J :

Current density distribution (A m−2)

n :

Valence (−)

\( \overline r \) :

General location vector (m)

t :

Time (s)

t′:

Time (s)

T :

Pulse period (s)

T′:

Dimensionless pulse period (−)

\( \overline v \) :

Velocity vector (m s−1)

x :

Distance (m)

α:

Duty cycle (−)

δ:

Nernst diffusion layer thickness (m)

λ:

Time (s)

τ:

Time constant (s)

Φc :

Mass flux (mol s−1 m−2)

ψ:

Pulse delay (s)

ψ*:

Optimal pulse delay (s)

ψlimit :

Limit pulse delay (s)

1D:

One dimensional

ECM:

Electrochemical machining

PECM:

Pulse electrochemical machining

QSS:

Quasi steady state

QSSSC:

Quasi steady state shortcut

SS:

Steady state

References

  1. Lohrengel M, Klueppel I, Rosenkranz C, Betterman H, Schultze J (2003) Electrochim Acta 48(20–22):3203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mount A, Clifton D, Howarth P, Sherlock A (2003) J Mater Process Technol 138:449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rajurkar KP, Zhu D, McGeough JA, Kozak J, De Silva A (1999) Ann CIRP 48(2):567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Datta M, Landolt D (1981) Electrochim Acta 26(7):899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kozak J (2004) Bull Polish Acad Sci: Technical Sci 52(4):313

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kozak J, Rajurkar K (1991) J Mater Process Technol 28(1–2):149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smets N, Van Damme S, De Wilde D, Weyns G, Deconinck J (2007) J Appl Electrochem 37(11):1345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosebrugh TR, Lash Miller W (1910) J Phys Chem 14(9):816

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Smets.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smets, N., Van Damme, S., De Wilde, D. et al. Time averaged concentration calculations in pulse electrochemical machining. J Appl Electrochem 38, 1577–1582 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-008-9608-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-008-9608-1

Keywords

Navigation