Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of pencil lead hardness on voltammetric response of graphite reinforcement carbon electrodes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work studied the voltammetric response of graphite reinforcement electrodes made of different pencil lead hardness. The studies showed that harder graphite leads, regardless of their manufacturer, are more appropriate as electrode material for voltammetric purposes due to their higher peak currents, increasing sensitivity and reproducibility, with ΔEp closer to the theoretical value for a reversible system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Staedtler Mars GmbH & Co (2002) Mechanical Pencils–Product Information, available in http://www.staedtler.com/cs_mechanical_pencils_gb.Staedtler?ActiveID=3022

  2. Sousa MC, Buchanan JW (2000) Computer Graphics Forum 19:27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kotani A, Miyaguchi Y, Harada D, Kusu F (2003) Anal Sci 19:1473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kitamura N, Kotani A, Kusu F (2004) Bunseki Kagaku 53:1097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blum D, Leyffer W, Holze R (1996) Electroanalysis 8:296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aoki K, Kobayashi A, Kato N (1990) Electroanalysis 2:31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaneko H, Yamada M, Auki K (1990) Anal Sci 6:439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ly SY, Jung YS, Kim MH, Han IK, Jung WW, Kim HS (2004) Microchim Acta 146:207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao W, Song J, Wu N (2005) J Electroanal Chem 576:1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Majidi MR, Danandeh-Jenagharad M (2005) Asian J Chem 17:2165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miyazaki K, Matsumoto G, Yamada M, Yasui S, Kaneko H (1999) Electrochim Acta 44:3809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bund A, Dittmann J, Lordkipanidze D, Schwitzgebel G (1996) Fresenius J Anal Chem 356:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Memetriades D, Economou A, Voulgaropoulos A (2004) Anal Chim Acta 519:167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jin J, Hirió T, Sato K, Miwa T, Takeuchi T (2002) Anal Sci 18:549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozsoz M, Erdem A, Ozkan D, Kerman K, Pinnavaia TJ (2003) Langmuir 19:4728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Perdicakis M, Aubriet H, Walcarius A (2004) Electroanalysis 16:2042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vestergaard M, Kerman K, Tamiya E (2005) Anal Chim. Acta 538:273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fojta M, Havran L, Billova S, Kostecka P, Masarik M, Kizek R (2003) Electroanalysis 15:431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang J, Kawde AN (2001) Anal Chim. Acta 431:219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang J, Kawde AN, Musameh M (2003) Analyst 128:912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kara P, Erdem A, Girousi S, Ozsoz M (2005) J Pharm Biomed Anal 38:191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kara P, Meric B, Zeytinoglu A, Ozsoz M (2004) Anal Chim Acta 518:69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Erdem A, Ozkan AD, Hakan K, Kara P, Sengonul A, Sayiner AA, Ozsoz M (2005) Electrochem Commun 7:815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ariksoysal DO, Karadeniz H, Erdem A, Sengonul A., Sayiner AA, Ozsoz M (2005) Anal Chem 77:4908

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Karadeniz H, Gulmez B, Sahinci F, A Erdem, Kaya GI, Unver N, Kivcak B, Ozsoz M (2003) J Pharm Biomed Anal 33:295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozsoz M, A Erdem, Kara P, Kerman K, Ozkan D (2003) Electroanalysis 15:613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Erdem A, Kosmider B, Osiecka R, Zyner E, Ochocki J, Ozsoz M (2005) J Pharm Biomed Anal 38:645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Aoki K, Okamoto T, Kaneko H, Nozaki K, Negishi A (1989) J Electroanal Chem 263:323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bond AM, Mahon PJ, Schiewe J, Beckett VV (1997) Anal Chim Acta 345:67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Montenegro MI, Queirós MA, Daschbach JL (1991) Microeletrodes: theory and applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

  31. Adrian WB (1999) Curr Sep 18:9

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nicholson RS, Shain I (1964) Anal Chem 36:706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang J, Yin Q, Cai S, Fujishima A (1993) Electroanalysis 5:517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kunimatsu K, Shigematsu Y, Uosaki K, Kita H (1989) J Electroanal Chem 262:195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wightman RM, Deakin MR, Kovach PM, Kuhr WG, Strutts KJ (1984) J Electrochem Soc 131:1578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Panzer RE, Elving PJ (1972) J.Electrochem.Soc 119:864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Laboulais JN, Trijueque J, Vicente F, Scholl H (1994) J Electroanal Chem 379:159

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to FAPEMIG and CNPq for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Jorge Sanches Barbeira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tavares, P.H.C.P., Barbeira, P.J.S. Influence of pencil lead hardness on voltammetric response of graphite reinforcement carbon electrodes. J Appl Electrochem 38, 827–832 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-008-9518-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-008-9518-2

Keywords

Navigation