Information Technology and Management

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 179–201 | Cite as

Information systems in seaports: a categorization and overview

Article

Abstract

Information systems have become indispensable to the competitiveness of ports, facilitating communication and decision making for enhancing the visibility, efficiency, reliability, and security in port operations under various conditions. Providing value-added information services and analytics is increasingly important to maintain a competitive edge and to fulfill regulatory requirements. Consequently, it is necessary to survey current information systems both from an academic and practical standpoint. In this paper, we present a classification and a comprehensive survey of information systems and related information technologies applied in ports. As such, the paper provides a state-of-the-art information-centric view on port operations and aims to bridge the gap between industry solutions and academic works.

Keywords

Port information systems Port information technologies Smart port Intelligent port Big data Port operations Maritime logistics Survey 

References

  1. 1.
    Akyildiz IF, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y, Cayirci E (2002) Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput Netw 38(4):393–422Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amundson I, Koutsoukos XD (2009) A survey on localization for mobile wireless sensor networks. Mobile entity localization and tracking in GPS-less environments. Springer, Berlin, pp 235–254Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashbrook D, Starner T (2003) Using GPS to learn significant locations and predict movement across multiple users. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 7(5):275–286Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ayaz M, Baig I, Abdullah A, Faye I (2011) A survey on routing techniques in underwater wireless sensor networks. J Netw Comput Appl 34(6):1908–1927Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bao Q (2010) Cargo shipment tags: making transport more transparent, efficient and safe. ISO Focus+ 1(4):29–30Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barletta GL, Bichou K (2007) Planning and implementing RFID technologies to enhance security in port operations. In: Bichou K, Bell MGH, Evans A (eds) Risk management in port operations, logistics and supply chain security. Informa, London, pp 63–82Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baron ML, Mathieu H (2013) PCS interoperability in Europe: a market for PCS operators? Int J Logist Manag 24(1):117–129Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baronti P, Pillai P, Chook VW, Chessa S, Gotta A, Hu YF (2007) Wireless sensor networks: a survey on the state of the art and the 802.15.4 and ZigBee standards. Comput Commun 30(7):1655–1695Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Böse JW (ed) (2011) Handbook of terminal planning, operations research/computer science interfaces series, vol 49. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bourquin S, Hortsing D, Johnston B (2009) Intelligent area lightingsystem. Google Patents, WO 2009003279:A1Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carlan V, Sys C, Vanelslander T (2016) How port community systems can contribute to port competitiveness: developing a cost-benefit framework. Res Transp Bus Manag 19:51–64Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chao SL, Lin YL (2010) Applying fuzzy AHP to select an automatic container number identification system in port terminals. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on supply chain management and information systems (SCMIS), pp 1–7. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen JV, Yen DC, Chen K (2009) The acceptance and diffusion of the innovative smart phone use: a case study of a delivery service company in logistics. Inf Manag 46(4):241–248Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choi HR, Kim HS, Park BJ, Park NK, Lee SW (2003) An ERP approach for container terminal operating systems. Marit Policy Manag 30(3):197–210Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choi HR, Park BJ, Shin JJ, Park NK (2007) Development of non-stop automated gate system. In: Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS international conference on systems, pp 259–265Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    CMA CGM: Toll charges for containers other cargoes passing through Nhava Sheva Port eff 01st May 2016 (2016). https://www.cma-cgm.com/local/india/news/289/toll-charges-for-containers-other-cargoes-passing-through-nhava-sheva-port-eff-01st-may-2016
  17. 17.
    Mondragon Coronado AE, Lalwani CS, Coronado Mondragon ES, Coronado Mondragon CE, Pawar KS (2012) Intelligent transport systems in multimodal logistics: a case of role and contribution through wireless vehicular networks in a sea port location. Int J Prod Econ 137:165–175Google Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Daniel JI, Bekka K (2000) The environmental impact of highway congestion pricing. J Urban Econ 47(2):180–215Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dargie W, Poellabauer C (2010) Fundamentals of wireless sensor networks: theory and practice. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Diaz MF (2003) Port community system: a key component of the future vision for cargo and port security. Gov Supply Chain 1(3):28–29Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dontharaju S, Tung S, Hoare RR, Cain JT, Mickle MH, Jones AK (2008) Design automation for RFID tags and systems. In: Ahson S, Ilyas M (eds) RFID handbook: applications technology, security, and privacy. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 35–64Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Elovic P (2003) Implementation of gate and crane OCR systems for container terminal automation and security. In: Proceedings of terminal operations conference ASIA (TOC ASIA), pp 1–7Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Erasmus University: SmartPort (2014) http://www.erim.eur.nl/research/centres/smart-port/
  25. 25.
    Ergen E, Akinci B, Sacks R (2007) Tracking and locating components in a precast storage yard utilizing radio frequency identification technology and GPS. Autom Constr 16(3):354–367Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ergen SC (2007) ZigBee/IEEE 802.15.4 summary. http://home.iitj.ac.in/~ramana/zigbee
  27. 27.
    Eriksen T, Hoye G, Narheim B, Meland BJ (2006) Maritime traffic monitoring using a space-based AIS receiver. Acta Astronaut 58(10):537–549Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Commission European (2011) Intelligent transport systems in action: action plan and legal framework for the deployment of intelligenttransport systems (ITS) in Europe. Tech. rep, European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and TransportGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    European Port Community Systems Association (EPCSA): how to develop a port community system (2011). http://www.epcsa.eu/port-community-systems/pcs-services
  30. 30.
    European Rail Industry: ERTMS in brief (2015). http://www.ertms.net/?page_id=40
  31. 31.
    Fan Y, Schwartz F, Voß S (2016) Flexible supply chain planning based on variable transportation modes. Int J Prod Econ. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.020
  32. 32.
    Fang X, Misra S, Xue G, Yang D (2012) Smart grid–the new and improved power grid: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 14(4):944–980Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Favenza A, Rossi C, Pasin M, Dominici F (2014) A cloud-based approach to GNSS augmentation for navigation services. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM international conference on utility and cloud computing (UCC), pp 489–490. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
    Fernández P, Santana JM, Ortega S, Trujillo A, Suárez JP, Domínguez C, Santana J, Sánchez A (2016) SmartPort: a platform for sensor data monitoring in a seaport based on FIWARE. Sensors 16(3):417–441Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Filipowicz W (2004) Vessel traffic control problems. J Navig 57(1):15–24Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Finkenzeller K (2010) Fundamentals and applications in contactless smart cards, radio frequency identification and near-field communication, 3rd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Garstone S (1995) Electronic data interchange (EDI) in port operations. Logist Inf Manag 8(2):30–33Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gaukler GM, Seifert RW (2007) Applications of RFID in supply chains. In: Jung H, Jeong B, Chen FF (eds) Trends in supply chain design and management. Springer, New York, pp 29–48Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ginsberg ML, Austin MM, Chang PA, Mattison SC (2009) Traffic routing using intelligent traffic signals, GPS and mobile data devices. Google Patents, US Patent App. 12/639,770Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Giuliano G, O’Brien T (2007) Reducing port-related truck emissions: the terminal gate appointment system at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 12(7):460–473Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Goccia M, Bruzzo M, Scagliola C, Dellepiane S (2003) Recognition of container code characters through gray-level feature extraction and gradient-based classifier optimization. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on document analysis and recognition (ICDAR), pp 973–973. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Goodchild A, Mohan K (2008) The clean trucks program: evaluation of policy impacts on marine terminal operations. Marit Econ Logist 10:393–408Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gordon JR, Lee PM, Lucas HC (2005) A resource-based view of competitive advantage at the Port of Singapore. J Strateg Inf Syst 14(1):69–86Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Guan CQ, Liu RR (2009) Modeling gate congestion of marine container terminals, truck waiting cost, and optimization. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2100(1):58–67Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hamburg Port Authority (HPA): Infrastruktur. Tech. rep., Hamburg Port Authority (2014). http://www.hamburg-portauthority.de/de/smartport/logistics/infrastruktur/Seiten/default.aspx
  47. 47.
    Hamburg Port Authority (HPA): port of Hamburg—digital gateway to the world. Tech. rep., Hamburg Port Authority (2014)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hamburg Port Authority (HPA): smartPORT logistics (2014). http://www.hamburg-port-authority.de/en/smartport/logistics/
  49. 49.
    Hamburg Port Authority (HPA): system to depict an integrated traffic situation—effective depiction of the traffic situation (EVE) in the Port of Hamburg (2014). http://www.hamburg-port-authority.de/en/smartport/logistics/traffic-flows/Seiten/default.aspx
  50. 50.
    Hamburg Port Authority (HPA): transPORT rail (2015). http://www.hamburg-port-authority.de/en/port-customers/port-railway
  51. 51.
    Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG (HHLA): HHLA launches first self-service terminal (2011). http://hhla.de/en/press-releases/overview/2011/07/hhla-launches-first-self-service-terminal.html
  52. 52.
    Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG (HHLA): PRISE optimises sequencing and arrival of mega-ships on the river Elbe and at the Port of Hamburg (2014). http://hhla.de/en/press-releases/overview/2014/03/it-platform-optimises-harbour-processes.html
  53. 53.
    Harder FC, Voß S (2012) A simple RFID cost model for the container shipping industry. Int J Shipp Transp Logist 4(2):172–181Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hassan T, Chatterjee S (2006) A taxonomy for RFID. In: Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), pp 1–10. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Heilig L, Lalla-Ruiz E, Voß S (2016) port-IO: a mobile cloud platform supporting context-aware inter-terminal truck routing. In: Proceedings of the 24th European conference on information systems (ECIS)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Heilig L, Schwarze S, Voß S (2017) An analysis of digital transformation in the history and future of modern ports. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) (in press). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Heilig L, Voß S (2014) A cloud-based SOA for enhancing information exchange and decision support in ITT operations. Lect Notes Comput Sci 8760:112–131Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Heilig L, Voß S (2014) A scientometric analysis of cloud computing literature. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 2(3):266–278Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Heilig L, Voß S (2017) Port-centric information management in smart ports: a framework and categorization. In: Geerlings H, Kuipers B, Zuidwijk R (eds) Ports and networks: strategies, operations and perspective. Routledge (to appear)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hill CA, Scudder GD (2002) The use of electronic data interchange for supply chain coordination in the food industry. J Oper Manag 20(4):375–387Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hintsa J, Männistö T, Urciuoli L, Granqvist M (2012) Future development of e-Customs: a survey study with Swiss companies. Int J Elect Govern Res 8(4):1–13Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hoogeweegen MR, Streng RJ, Wagenaar RW (1998) A comprehensive approach to assess the value of EDI. Inf Manag 34(3):117–127Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hu Q, Yong J, Shi C, Chen G (2010) Evaluation of main traffic congestion degree for restricted waters with AIS reports. Int J Marit Navig Saf Sea Transp 4(1):55–58Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Huynh N, Walton C (2008) Robust scheduling of truck arrivals at marine container terminals. J Transp Eng 134(8):347–353Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    International Port Community Systems Association (IPCSA): port community systems (2014). http://ipcsa.international/pcs
  66. 66.
    Ioannou P (2006) Cooperative time window generation for cargodelivery/pick up with application to container terminals. Tech.rep, METRANS Transportation CenterGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ioannou PA, Jula H, Liu CI, Vukadinovic K, Pourmohammadi H, Dougherty E (2000) Advanced material handling: automated guided vehicles in agile ports. Tech. rep., Center for advanced transportation technologies, Univ. Southern California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Islam S, Olsen T, Daud Ahmed M (2013) Reengineering the seaport container truck hauling process: Reducing empty slot trips for transport capacity improvement. Bus Process Manag J 19(5):752–782Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Jarašūnienė A (2007) Research into intelligent transport systems (ITS) technologies and efficiency. Transport 22(2):61–67Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Jeong SH, Lee HJ, Lee JS, Oh CH (2006) Performance analysis of location estimation algorithm using an intelligent coordination scheme in RTLS. In: Gabrys B, Howlett RJ, Jain LC (eds) Knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 829–835Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Jiang B, Yao X (2006) Location-based services and GIS in perspective. Comput Environ Urban Syst 30(6):712–725Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Keceli Y (2011) A proposed innovation strategy for Turkish port administration policy via information technology. Marit Policy Manag 38(2):151–167Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Keceli Y, Choi HR, Cha YS, Aydogdu YV (2008) A study on adoption of port community systems according to organization size. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on convergence and hybrid information technology (ICCIT), pp 493–501. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lai KH, Wong CW, Cheng T (2008) A coordination-theoretic investigation of the impact of electronic integration on logistics performance. Inf Manag 45(1):10–20Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Lalla-Ruiz E, Shi X, Voß S (2016) The waterway ship scheduling problem. Transp Res Part D. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2016.09.013
  76. 76.
    Lee SY, Cho GS (2007) A simulation study for the operations analysis of dynamic planning in container terminals considering RTLS. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on innovative computing, information and control (ICICIC), pp 116–119. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Lee-Partridge JE, Teo TS, Lim VK (2000) Information technology management: the case of the Port of Singapore Authority. J Strateg Inf Syst 9(1):85–99Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lin B, Huang CH (2006) Comparison between ARPA radar and AIS characteristics for vessel traffic services. J Mar Sci Technol 14(3):182–189Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Lokuge P, Alahakoon D (2007) Improving the adaptability in automated vessel scheduling in container ports using intelligent software agents. Eur J Oper Res 177(3):1985–2015Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Long DC (2004) International logistics: global supply chain management, 2nd edn. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Lynch WD (1982) Vessel traffic services. Master thesis, University of Rhode IslandGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ma X, Liu T (2011) The application of Wi-Fi RTLS in automatic warehouse management system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on automation and logistics (ICAL), pp 64–69. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Maples TB (2011) Wireless ad hoc sensor networks for port security. METRANS Transportation Center, California StateUniversity, Tech. repGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    McGinley K (2014) Preparing port container terminals for the future: making the most of intelligent transport systems (ITS). Urban Transp XX 138:419–427Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Michael K, McCathie L (2005) The pros and cons of RFID in supply chain management. In: Proceedings of the international conference on mobile business (ICMB), pp 623–629. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Morais P, Lord E (2006) Terminal appointment system study. Tech.rep, Roche Ltée, Groupe-conseil and Levelton ConsultantsGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mori S, Suen CY, Yamamoto K (1992) Historical review of OCR research and development. Proc IEEE 80(7):1029–1058Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Mullot R, Olivier C, Bourdon JL, Courtellemont P, Labiche J, Lecourtier Y (1991) Automatic extraction methods of container identity number and registration plates of cars. In: Proceedings of the international conference on industrial electronics, control and instrumentation (IECON), pp 1739–1744. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Murty KG, Wan Y-W, Liu J, Tseng MM, Leung E, Lai K-K, Chiu HWC (2005) Hongkong International Terminals gains elastic capacity using a data-intensive decision-support system. Interfaces 35(1):61–75Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Namboothiri R, Erera AL (2008) Planning local container drayage operations given a port access appointment system. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 44(2):185–202Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Narzullaev A, Park Y, Yoo K, Yu J (2011) A fast and accurate calibration algorithm for real-time locating systems based on the received signal strength indication. AEU Int J Electron Commun 65(4):305–311Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Navis: Navis SPARCS N4—the industry standard terminal operating system (2014). http://navis.com/solutions/container/sparcs-n4
  93. 93.
    Nayak A, Stojmenovic I (eds) (2010) Wireless sensor and actuator networks. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Neo BS (1994) Managing new information technologies: lessons from Singapore’s experience with EDI. Inf Manag 26(6):317–326Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Ngai E, Li CL, Cheng T, Lun YV, Lai KH, Cao J, Lee M (2011) Design and development of an intelligent context-aware decision support system for real-time monitoring of container terminal operations. Int J Prod Res 49(12):3501–3526Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Notteboom TE (2006) The time factor in liner shipping services. Marit Econ Logist 8(1):19–39Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Notteboom TE, Winkelmans W (2001) Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge? Marit Policy Manag 28(1):71–89Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Pacciarelli D, D’Ariano A, Scotto M (2011) Applying RFID in warehouse operations of an Italian courier express company. Netnomics 12(3):209–222Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Park DJ, Choi YB, Nam KC (2006) RFID-based RTLS for improvement of operation system in container terminals. In: Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific conference on communications (APCC), pp 1–5. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Port of London Authority (PLA): About London VTS (2014). http://www.pla.co.uk/Safety/About-London-VTS
  101. 101.
    Port of London Authority (PLA): What is Thames AIS? (2014). http://www.pla.co.uk/Safety/Thames-AIS
  102. 102.
    Port of Seattle: RFID tags required to enter container terminals (2014). http://www.portseattle.org/Cargo/SeaCargo/Pages/RFID.aspx
  103. 103.
    Posti A, Häkkinen J, Tapaninen U (2011) Promoting information exchange with a port community system–case Finland. Int Supply Chain Manag Collab Pract 4:455–473Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Psaraftis HN, Kontovas CA (2010) Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 15(8):458–462Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Raus M, Flügge B, Boutellier R (2009) Electronic customs innovation: an improvement of governmental infrastructures. Gov Inf Q 26(2):246–256Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Reiners T, Voß S (2000) Costs and benefits of EDI integrationin supply chains and networks. Technische Universität Braunschweig, Tech. repGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Reynolds JC, Denaro RP, Kalafus RM (1990) GPS-based vessel position monitoring and display system. In: Proceedings of the position location and navigation symposium (PLANS), pp 601–607. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Rieback MR, Crispo B, Tanenbaum AS (2006) The evolution of RFID security. IEEE Pervasive Comput 5(1):62–69Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Rivas MB, Martin-Neira M (2006) Coherent GPS reflections from the sea surface. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 3(1):28–31Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Rodon J, Pastor JA, Sese F, Christiaanse E (2008) Unravelling the dynamics of IOIS implementation: an actor-network study of an IOIS in the seaport of Barcelona. J Inf Technol 23(2):97–108Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Sandhu JS, Agogino AM, Agogino AK (2004) Wireless sensor networks for commercial lighting control: Decision making with multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the AAAI workshop on sensor networks, pp 131–140Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Sarac A, Absi N, Dauzere-Peres S (2010) A literature review on the impact of RFID technologies on supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 128(1):77–95Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Schaefer S (2006) Secure trade lane: a sensor network solution for more predictable and more secure container shipments. In: Companion to the 21st ACM SIGPLAN symposium on object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications, pp 839–845. ACMGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Schäfer RP, Thiessenhusen KU, Wagner P (2002) A traffic information system by means of real-time floating-car data. In: Proceedings of the ITS world congress, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Schulte F, Gonzalez RG, Voß S (2015) Reducing port-related truck emissions: Coordinated truck appointments to reduce empty truck trips. Lect Notes Comput Sci 9335:495–509Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Seidelmann C (2007) Developing and implementing global interoperable standards for container security. In: Bichou K, Bell MGH, Evans A (eds) Risk management in port operations, logistics and supply chain security. Informa, London, pp 55–60Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Shi X, Tao D, Voß S (2011) RFID technology and its application to port-based container logistics. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 21(4):332–347Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Shintani K, Imai A, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S (2007) The container shipping network design problem with empty container repositioning. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 43(1):39–59Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Simroth A, Zähle H (2011) Travel time prediction using floating car data applied to logistics planning. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 12(1):243–253Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Smith LD, Sweeney DC, Campbell JF (2008) Simulation of alternative approaches to relieving congestion at locks in a river transportion system. J Oper Res Soc 60(4):519–533Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Song DP, Carter J (2009) Empty container repositioning in liner shipping. Marit Policy Manag 36(4):291–307Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Srour FJ, van Oosterhout M, van Baalen P, Zuidwijk R (2008) Port community system implementation: lessons learned from international scan. In: Transportation research board 87th annual meetingGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Stahlbock R, Voß S (2008) Operations research at container terminals: a literature update. OR Spectr 30(1):1–52Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    SteadieSeifi M, Dellaert NP, Nuijten W, Van Woensel T, Raoufi R (2014) Multimodal freight transportation planning: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 233(1):1–15Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Steenken D, Voß S, Stahlbock R (2004) Container terminal operation and operations research–a classification and literature review. OR Spectr 26(1):3–49Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Tajima M (2007) Strategic value of RFID in supply chain management. J Purch Supply Manag 13(4):261–273Google Scholar
  127. 127.
  128. 128.
    Thiers GF, Janssens GK (1998) A port simulation model as a permanent decision instrument. Simulation 71(2):117–125Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Tijan E, Kos S, Ogrizović D (2009) Disaster recovery and business continuity in port community systems. Sci J Marit Res 23(1):243–260Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Tsamboulas D, Moraiti P, Lekka AM (2012) Performance evaluation for implementation of port community system. Transp Res Rec 2273:29–37Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Tsen JKT (2011) Ten years of single window implementation: lessons learned for the future. In: Proceedings of the global trade facilitation conference, pp 1–30Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    United Nations: Recommendation and guidelines on establishing a single window to enhance the efficient exchange of information between trade and government: recommendation no. 33. Tech. rep., United Nations, Centre for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    United Nations: World urbanization prospects. Tech. rep., United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs (2014). https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Highlights
  134. 134.
    Urciuoli L, Hintsa J, Ahokas J (2013) Drivers and barriers affecting usage of e-customs-a global survey with customs administrations using multivariate analysis techniques. Gov Inf Q 30(4):473–485Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Van Baalen P, Zuidwijk R, van Nunen J (2009) Port inter-organizational information systems: capabilities to service global supply chains. Found Trends Technol Inf Oper Manag 2(2–3):81–241Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Wamba SF, Chatfield AT (2009) A contingency model for creating value from RFID supply chain network projects in logistics and manufacturing environments. Eur J Inf Syst 18(6):615–636Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Wang W, Yuan Y, Wang X, Archer N (2006) RFID implementation issues in China: Shanghai Port case study. J Internet Commerce 5(4):89–103Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Want R (2006) An introduction to RFID technology. IEEE Pervasive Comput 5(1):25–33Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Wenjie C, Lifeng C, Zhanglong C, Shiliang T (2005) A real-time dynamic traffic control system based on wireless sensor network. In: Proceedings of the international conference workshops on parallel processing (ICPP), pp 258–264. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Wiegmans BW, Hoest AVD, Notteboom TE (2008) Port and terminal selection by deep-sea container operators. Marit Policy Manag 35(6):517–534Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Williams P, Basker S, Ward N (2008) e-Navigation and the case for eLoran. J Navig 61(03):473–484Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    World Cargo News: Hamburg launches ChainPORT (2016). http://www.worldcargonews.com/htm/w20160406.776974.htm
  143. 143.
    Wrigley CD, Wagenaar RW, Clarke RA (1994) Electronic data interchange in international trade: frameworks for the strategic analysis of ocean port communities. J Strateg Inf Syst 3(3):211–234Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Yang H, Yang L, Yang SH (2011) Hybrid Zigbee RFID sensor network for humanitarian logistics centre management. J Netw Comput Appl 34(3):938–948Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Yick J, Mukherjee B, Ghosal D (2008) Wireless sensor network survey. Comput Netw 52(12):2292–2330Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Zhang J, Ioannou PA, Chassiakos A (2006) Automated container transport system between inland port and terminals. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul 16(2):95–118Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Zhao W, Goodchild AV (2010) The impact of truck arrival information on container terminal rehandling. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 46(3):327–343Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Zuidwijk RA, Veenstra AW (2014) The value of information in container transport. Transp Sci 49(3):675–685Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Information Systems (IWI)University of HamburgHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Escuela de Ingenieria IndustrialPontificia Universidad Católica de ValparaísoValparaisoChile

Personalised recommendations