Information Technology and Management

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 193–206 | Cite as

Applying social exchange theory in IT service relationships: exploring roles of exchange characteristics in knowledge sharing



Extending the social exchange theory which emphasizes trust and dependence as important in building and maintaining relationships, exchange specific characteristics (relationship investments and benefits) are additionally posited here as critical antecedents in knowledge sharing relationship among IT service team members, along with partner characteristics (expertise and value similarity) and interaction (communication frequency). An instrument was constructed and administered against client side project leaders in three different IT service firms. Analyses of 126 data points revealed that relationship benefit, investments, and expertise are strongly associated with dependence while relationship investment, expertise and value similarity are strongly associated with trust in IT service relationship. Findings confirm that the exchange characteristics suggested by the social exchange theory plays important roles in building and maintaining dependence in IT service relationships and, in turn, towards building trust for knowledge sharing, but only indirectly via dependence. Also, paths from dependence to trust and knowledge sharing are confirmed as suggested by previous studies. Results implies that the benefits and investments for and in IT service relationship needs to be cultivated, exposed and emphasized in order to increase the necessary knowledge sharing levels. Limitations of the study are discussed with suggestions for further studies into social exchange characteristics in the conclusion.


Systems development Knowledge sharing Dependence Trust Social exchange theory 



This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2012S1A3A2033474).


  1. 1.
    Tiwana A, McLean ER (2005) Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development. J Manag Inf Syst 22:13–43Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xia W, Lee G (2004) Grasping the complexity of IS development projects. Commun ACM 47:68–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pee LG, Kankanhalli A, Kim H-W (2010) Knowledge sharing in information systems development: a social interdependence perspective. J Assoc Inf Syst 11:550–575Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hewett K, Bearden WO (2001) Dependence, trust, and relational behavior on the part of foreign subsidiary marketing operations: implications for managing global marketing operations. J Mark 65:51–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu Q, Ma Q (2008) Determinants of ERP implementation knowledge transfer. Inf Manag 45:528–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ganesan S (1994) Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer–seller relationships. J Mark 58:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Razzaque MA, Tan Gay Boon MA (2003) Effects of dependence and trust on channel satisfaction, commitment and cooperation. J Bus Bus Mark 10:23–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sezen B, Yilmaz C (2007) Relative effects of dependence and trust on flexibility, information exchange, and solidarity in marketing channels. J Bus Ind Mark 22:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nelson KM, Cooprider JG (1996) The contribution of shared knowledge to is group performance. MIS Q 20:409–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kotlarsky J, Oshri H (2005) Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. Eur J Inf Syst 14:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sarker S, Nicholson DB, Joshi KD (2005) Knowledge transfer in virtual systems development teams: an exploratory study of four key enablers. Prof Commun IEEE Trans 48:201–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ko D-G, Kirsch LJ, King WR (2005) Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. MIS Q 29:59–85Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chiu C-M, Hsu M-H, Wang RTG (2006) Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decis Support Syst 42:1872–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones MC, Cline M, Ryan S (2006) Exploring knowledge sharing in ERP implementation: an organizational culture framework. Decis Support Syst 41:411–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mooradian T, Renzl B, Matzler K (2006) Who trusts? Personality, trust and knowledge sharing. Manag Learn 37:523–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Joshi KD, Sarker S, Sarker S (2007) Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: examining the role of knowledge source attributes. Decis Support Syst 43:322–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang S-C, Farn C-K (2009) Social capital, behavioural control, and tacit knowledge sharing—a multi-informant design. Int J Inf Manage 29:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yuan M, Zhang X, Chen Z, Vogel DR, Chu X (2009) Antecedents of coordination effectiveness of software developer dyads from interacting teams: an empirical investigation. Eng Manag IEEE Trans 56:494–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lin T-C, Huang C-C (2010) Withholding effort in knowledge contribution: the role of social exchange and social cognitive on project teams. Inf Manag 47:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organ Sci 2:88–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fey CF, Furu P (2008) Top management incentive compensation and knowledge sharing in multinational corporations. Strateg Manag J 29:1301–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ke W, Wei KK (2007) Factors affecting trading partners’ knowledge sharing: using the lens of transaction cost economics and socio-political theories. Electron Commer Res Appl 6:297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pan SL, Leidner DE (2003) Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing. J Strateg Inf Syst 12:71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Del Rosso C (2009) Comprehend and analyze knowledge networks to improve software evolution. J Softw Maint Evol Res Pract 21:189–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hendriks P (1999) Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowl Process Manag 6:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Davenport TH, De Long DW, Beers MC (1998) Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Manage Rev 39(2):43–57Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bock G-W, Zmud RW, Kim Y-G, Lee J-N (2005) Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivatiors. Soc Psychol Forces Organ Clim MIS Q 29:87–112Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ryu S, Ho SH, Han I (2003) Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals. Expert Syst Appl 25:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Manage Sci 46:1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bendapudi N, Berry LL (1997) Customers’ motivations for maintaining relationships with service providers. J Retail 73:15–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yilmaz C, Sezen B, Ozdemir O (2005) Joint and interactive effects of trust and (inter) dependence on relational behaviors in long-term channel dyads. Ind Mark Manage 34:235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. J Mark Res 18:382–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pan SL, Newell S, Huang J, Galliers RD (2007) Overcoming knowledge management challenges during ERP implementation: the need to integrate and share different types of knowledge. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 58:404–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vandaie R (2008) The role of organizational knowledge management in successful ERP implementation projects. Knowl Based Syst 21:920–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lawson B, Petersen KJ, Cousins PD, Handfield RB (2009) Knowledge sharing in interorganizational product development teams: the effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms*. J Prod Innov Manage 26:156–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yang Z, Peterson RT (2004) Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: the role of switching costs. Psychol Mark 21:799–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Staples DS, Webster J (2008) Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams. Inf Syst J 18:617–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lander MC, Purvis RL, McCray GE, Leigh W (2004) Trust-building mechanisms utilized in outsourced IS development projects: a case study. Inf Manag 41:509–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Renzl B (2008) Trust in management and knowledge sharing: the mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation. Omega 36:206–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kanawattanachai P, Yoo Y (2007) The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Q 31:783Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Maurer I (2010) How to build trust in inter-organizational projects: the impact of project staffing and project rewards on the formation of trust, knowledge acquisition and product innovation. Int J Project Manage 28:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rusbult CE, Van Lange PAM (1996) Interdependence processes. Social psychology: handbook of basic principles. In: Tory E, Kruglanski AW (eds) Social psychology: handbook of basic principles. PressHiggins, New York, pp 564–596Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Van der Vegt GS, Van de Vliert E (2005) Effects of perceived skill dissimilarity and task interdependence on helping in work teams. J Manag 31:73–89Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wells CV, Kipnis D (2001) Trust, dependency, and control in the contemporary organization. J Bus Psychol 15:593–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Andaleeb SS (1996) An experimental investigation of satisfaction and commitment in marketing channels: the role of trust and dependence. J Retail 72:77–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wicks AC, Berman SL, Jones TM (1999) The structure of optimal trust: moral and strategic implications. Acad Manag Rev 24:99–116Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Grant RM, Baden-Fuller C (2004) A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. J Manage Stud 41:61–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sweeney JC, Webb D (2002) Relationship benefits: an exploration of buyer–supplier dyads. J Relat Mark 1:77Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Vázquez-Carrasco R, Foxall GR (2006) Positive vs. negative switching barriers: the influence of service consumers’ need for variety. J Consum Behav 5:367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Morgan RM, Hunt SD (1994) The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J Mark 58:20–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lewandowski J, Rosenberg BD, Parks MJ, Siegel JT (2011) The effect of informal social support: face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication. Comput Hum Behav 27:1806–1814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rodríguez NG, Pérez MJS, Gutiérrez JAT (2008) Can a good organizational climate compensate for a lack of top management commitment to new product development? J Bus Res 61:118–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Palmatier RW, Scheer LK, Houston MB, Evans KR, Gopalakrishna S (2007) Use of relationship marketing programs in building customer–salesperson and customer–firm relationships: differential influences on financial outcomes. Int J Res Mark 24:210–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Palmatier RW, Gopalakrishna S, Houston MB (2006) Returns on business-to-business relationship marketing investments: strategies for leveraging profits. Mark Sci 25:477–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Goo J, Kishore R, Rao HR, Nam K (2009) The role of service level agreements in relational management of information technology outsourcing: an empirical study. MIS Q 33:119–145Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A (1996) The behavioral consequences of service quality. J Mark 60:16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Doney PM, Cannon JP (1997) An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships. J Mark 61:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chiu H-C, Hsieh Y-C, Li Y-C, Lee M (2005) Relationship marketing and consumer switching behavior. J Bus Res 58:1681–1689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Palmatier RW, Dant RP, Grewal D (2007) A comparative longitudinal analysis of theoretical perspectives of interorganizational relationship performance. J Mark 71:172–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jones MA, Reynolds KE, Mothersbaugh DL, Beatty SE (2007) The positive and negative effects of switching costs on relational outcomes. J Serv Res 9:335–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Belonax JJJ, Newell SJ, Plank RE (2007) The role of purchase importance on buyer perceptions of the trust and expertise components of supplier and salesperson credibility in business-to-business relationships. J Pers Sell Sales Manag 27:247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wang ETG, Lin CC-L, Jiang JJ, Klein G (2007) Improving enterprise resource planning (ERP) fit to organizational process through knowledge transfer. Int J Inf Manag 27:200–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Palmatier RW, Dant RP, Grewal D, Evans KR (2006) Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: a meta-analysis. J Mark 70:136–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Celly KS, Frazier GL (1996) Outcome-based and behavior-based coordination efforts in channel relationships. J Mark Res 33:200–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Scheer L, Miao C, Garrett J (2010) The effects of supplier capabilities on industrial customers’ loyalty: the role of dependence. J Acad Mark Sci 38:90–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Moorman C, Deshpande R, Zaltman G (1993) Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. J Mark 57:81–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Spake DF, Megehee CM (2010) Consumer sociability and service provider expertise influence on service relationship success. J Serv Mark 24:314–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ming-Tien T, Chao-Wei C, Cheng-Chung C (2010) The effect of trust belief and salesperson’s expertise on consumer’s intention to purchase nutraceuticals: applying the theory of reasoned action. Soc Behav Personal Int J 38:273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Thong JYL, Yap C-S (1994) Engagement of external expertise in information systems implementation. J Manag Inf Syst 11:209–231Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Johnson D, Grayson K (2005) Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. J Bus Res 58:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Darr ED, Kurtzberg TR (2000) An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82:28–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Nicholson C, Compeau L, Sethi R (2001) The role of interpersonal liking in building trust in long-term channel relationships. J Acad Mark Sci 29:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ring P, Van de Ven A (1994) Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad Manag Rev 19:90–118Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Robson MJ, Katsikeas CS, Bello DC (2008) Drivers and performance outcomes of trust in international strategic alliances: the role of organizational complexity. Organ Sci 19:647–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Gefen D (2004) What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness. J Manag Inf Syst 21:263–288Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Fisher RJ, Maltz E, Jaworski BJ (1997) Enhancing communication between marketing and engineering: the moderating role of relative funcational identification. J Mark 61:54–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Hartwick J, Barki H (2001) Communication as a dimension of user participation. Prof Commun IEEE Trans 44:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Mitręga M, Katrichis JM (2010) Benefiting from dedication and constraint in buyer–seller relationships. Ind Mark Manage 39:616–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Giddens A (1990) The consequences of modernity. Strandford University Press, StrandfordGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    de Ruyter K, Moorman L, Lemmink J (2001) Antecedents of commitment and trust in customer-supplier relationships in high technology markets. Ind Mark Manage 30:271–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Anderson JC, Narus JA (1990) A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. J Mark 54:42–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Becerra-Fernandez I, Sabherwal R (2001) Organizational knowledge management: a contingency perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 18:23–55Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Park J-G, Lee J (2014) Knowledge sharing in information systems development projects: explicating the role of dependence and trust. Int J Project Manage 32:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Reynolds KE, Beatty SE (1999) Customer benefits and company consequences of customer–salesperson relationships in retailing. J Retail 75:11–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    De Kristof W, Gaby O-S, Iacobucci D (2001) Investments in consumer relationships: a cross-country and cross-industry exploration. J Mark 65:33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88:879–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res 14:396–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Gefen D, Straub DW, Boudreau M-C (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun AIS 4:1–79Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Barclay C, Osei-Bryson K-M (2009) Toward a more practical approach to evaluating programs: the multi-objective realization approach. Project Manag J 40:74–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Hair J Jr, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (1995) Multivariate data analysis: with readings. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA (ed) Methodology for business and management. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, pp 295–336Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Massey GR, Kyriazis E (2007) Interpersonal trust between marketing and R&D during new product development projects. Eur J Mark 41:1146–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Park J, Lee J, Lee H, Truex D (2012) Exploring the impact of communication effectiveness on service quality, trust and relationship commitment in IT services. Int J Inf Manage 32:459–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IT Policy & Strategy Research InstituteYonsei UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Graduate School of InformationYonsei UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Center for Work ScienceYonsei UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations