Erratum to: Inf Technol Manag DOI 10.1007/s10799-014-0192-2

The citation numbers for references from 44 to 84 should be corrected by adding one to the number of each of the citations from 44 to 84. The citation number will then correspond to the correct reference in the Reference section.

That is, citation number 44 in the text refers to reference number 45, citation number 45 in the text refers to reference number 46, and so on, for all citations 44 and above.

For example, the fourth sentence in the last paragraph of section 1.1 should read as follows:

Two meta-analyses have found consistent positive relationships between CSR and financial performance [45, 57], whereas others have had neutral results, finding that firms engaging in CSR will earn the same rate of profit as those that do not [50].

Thus, the first citation in the above sentence is a reference to Margolis JD, Elfenbein HA, Walsh JP (2007) Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. In: Proceed Acad of Manage, Philadelphia, PA. Pace University, New York, NY.

The one exception to this is the other two citations to number [44], which are also in the last paragraph of section 1.1. These two [44]s refer to reference listed as [44], which is the following: Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2003) Misery loves company: rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin Sci Quart 48:268–305.