Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the impact of the direct experience of architecture precedents: a study of master student teams

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Design teams often rely on precedents, but the impact of using the direct experience of a precedent on design behavior requires further investigation. To explore this impact, fifteen teams of master students of architecture participated in two design sessions: one without and the other with a previous experience of visiting an example. The think-aloud protocol was applied, and a multi-layer coding based on FBS and precedent types was proposed to measure episodic (a specific design experience) and semantic (general design principles) precedents. Furthermore, a measurement was proposed to examine how and when the teams analyzed the precedents or applied them to solve the problem. Dynamic analyses were used to study the differences between the two conditions based on the distribution of precedents and the Problem-Solution index. Statistical analysis unfolded significant differences between the two conditions. In the second design session, the number of precedents, solution generations, and analyzing precedents were significantly increased. The first design session's episodic precedent had categorical similarity with both semantic and episodic precedents of the second design session. The results also indicated that design teams preferred to analyze the visiting experience of the precedent at the outset of the design session and apply other precedents for solving the design problem until the end of the session. While in the second design session, solution generation significantly increased, more episodic precedents related to the direct experience were used for problem framing. From another perspective, these precedents were also applied more to generate design concepts rather than refining design ideations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The protocols have been also used in previously unpublished paper on the FBS co-design model coding, titled” The Role of interaction with an Example on Student Teams Design Behavior” (submitted).

References

  • Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994). Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications, 7(1), 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akin, Ö. (2002). Case-based instruction strategies in architecture. Design Studies, 23(4), 407–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amado, A., & López-Chao, V. (2020). Analogue and digital access to architectural information. Interaction Design and Architecture (s) Journal, 47, 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashrafganjouei, M., & Gero, J. S. (2021). Exploring the effect of a visual constraint on students’ design cognition. AI EDAM, 35(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atman, C. J., & Bursic, K. M. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis as a method to document engineering student design processes. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(2), 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aygen, Z., & Flemming, U. (1998). Classification of precedents. CAADRIA ‘98, CAADRIA, Osaka, 435–444.

  • Boling, E. (2020). The nature and use of precedent in designing. Design for Learning: Principles, Processes, and Praxis. EdTech Books. Https://Edtechbooks. Org/Id/Precedent

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crilly, N. (2015). Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers. Design Studies, 38, 54–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Napoli, L., Rizzuti, S., & Raco, A. (2018). How mood fosters creativity in product design? Experimental evidences on humour impact during a conceptual design session in a master degree class. DS 93: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2018), Dyson School of Engineering, Imperial College, London. 6th-7th September 2018, 242–247.

  • Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., & Beale, R. (2004). Human-computer interaction (3d Ed.). Pearson/Prentice Hall.

  • Djari, C., & Arrouf, A. (2019). The impact of viewing images of precedents on the cognitive process of architectural idea generation. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1(1), 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doboli, A., & Umbarkar, A. (2014). The role of precedents in increasing creativity during iterative design of electronic embedded systems. Design Studies, 35(3), 298–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C., & Stacey, M. (2000). Sources of inspiration: A language of design. Design Studies, 21(5), 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilouti, B. H. (2009). Design knowledge recycling using precedent-based analysis and synthesis models. Design Studies, 30(4), 340–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erktin, E., & Soygeniş, S. (2014). Learning by experiencing the space: Informal learning environments in architecture education. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 31(1), 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatema, A. K., Singh, J., Garg, N., & Deshpande, A. J. (2020). EXPERIENCE OF ARCHITECTURE. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(15), 5804–5811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulconbridge, J. R. (2010). Global architects: Learning and innovation through communities and constellations of practice. Environment and Planning A, 42(12), 2842–2858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, T., Eckert, C., & Clarkson, P. J. (2007). Externalizing tacit overview knowledge: A model-based approach to supporting design teams. AI EDAM, 21(3), 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frich, J., Nouwens, M., Halskov, K., & Dalsgaard, P. (2021). How digital tools impact convergent and divergent thinking in design ideation. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–11).

  • Gero, J. S., & Milovanovic, J. (2020). A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains. Design Science, 6, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, L., Cash, P., & McKilligan, S. (2020). The future of design cognition analysis. Design Science, 6(20), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzberger, H. (2008). Space and learning: Lessons in architecture 3 (Vol. 3). 010 Publishers.

  • Jiang, H., Gero, J. S., & Yen, C.-C. (2014). Exploring designing styles using a problem–solution division. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Design Computing and Cognition’12 (pp. 85–101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_5

  • Kan, W. T., & Gero, J. (2017). Quantitative methods for studying design Protocols. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kannengiesser, U., & Gero, J. S. (2022). What distinguishes a model of systems engineering from other models of designing? An ontological, data-driven analysis. Research in Engineering Design, 33(2), 129–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E., & Kim, K. (2015). Cognitive styles in design problem solving: Insights from network-based cognitive maps. Design Studies, 40, 1–38.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. (2001). Learning from the architecture studio: Implications for project-based pedagogy. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4/5), 349–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (2004). Schemata, gambits and precedent: Some factors in design expertise. Design Studies, 25(5), 443–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified. Routledge.

  • Lopez-Mesa, B., Mulet, E., Vidal, R., & Thompson, G. (2011). Effects of additional stimuli on idea-finding in design teams. Journal of Engineering Design, 22(1), 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, R. (1990). Prior knowledge in design: A dynamic knowledge-based model of design and creativity. Design Studies, 11(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, R., & Oxman, R. (1994). Remembrance of things past: Design precedents in libraries. In A. Tzonis & I. White (Eds.), Automation based creative design (Vol. 2, pp. 55–68). Elsevier.

  • Pallasmaa, J. (2000). Hapticity and time. Architectural Review, 207(1), 78–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauder, J., & Jin, Y. (2016). A qualitative study of collaborative stimulation in group design thinking. Design Science, 2(e4), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S., Kuliga, S., Hölscher, C., Conroy-Dalton, R., Kunert, A., Kulik, A., & Donath, D. (2013). Educating architecture students to design buildings from the inside out. Proceedings of the 9th International Space Syntax Symposium, 363–375.

  • Suwa, M., Purcell, T., & Gero, J. (1998). Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers’ cognitive actions. Design Studies, 19(4), 455–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A Protocol Analysis. Design Studies, 18(4), 385–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W. (1995). Use of episodic knowledge and information in design problem solving. Design Studies, 16(2), 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. M., & Li, P. (2019). The visual aesthetics measurement on interface design education. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 27(3), 138–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, S., Shen, D., Zhang, E., & Bao, D. (2020). Tradeoff between Episodic and Semantic Precedents in creative design. 2020 13th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID) (pp. 230–233).

  • Zou, N., Zhang, X., Lou, J., Liao, J., & Chai, C. (2023). Exploring the precedents retrieval styles of industrial and mechanical design students during brainstorming. International Journal of Technology and Design Education (pp. 1–17).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr John S. Gero (research professor in computer science and architecture at University of North Carolina) for his suggestions on improving the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Saba Faculty of Arts and Architecture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Imam Khomeini Highway, Kerman, Iran

    Mohammadali Ashrafganjouei

  2. Department of Architecture, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

    Hamid Nadimi

Authors
  1. Mohammadali Ashrafganjouei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hamid Nadimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammadali Ashrafganjouei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that there are no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ashrafganjouei, M., Nadimi, H. Exploring the impact of the direct experience of architecture precedents: a study of master student teams. Int J Technol Des Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09884-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09884-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation