References
Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. A. (2001). Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman
Hsiao, H. S., Yu, K. C., Chang, Y. S., Chien, Y. H., Lin, K. Y., Lin, C. Y., Chen, J. C., Chen, J. H., Lin, Y. W. (2017). The Study on Integrating the Design Thinking Model and STEM Activity Unit for Senior High School Living Technology Course. In 2017 7th World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF), 383-390. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF.2017.8467111
Hsiao, H. S., Lin, Y. W., Lin, K. Y., Lin, C. Y., Chen, J. H., & Chen, J. C. (2022). Using robot-based practices to develop an activity that incorporated the 6E model to improve elementary school students’ learning performances. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636090
Hsiao, H. S., Chen, J. C.*, Lin, C. Y., Zhuo, P. W., & Lin, K. Y. (2019). Using 3D printing technology with experiential learning strategies to improve pre-engineering students’ comprehension of abstract scientific concepts and hands-on ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2),178-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12319
Chen, J. C., Huang, Y., Lin, K. Y., Chang, Y. S., Lin, H. C., Lin, C. Y., & Hsiao, H. S. (2020). Developing a hands‐on activity using virtual reality to help students learn by doing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(1),46-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12389
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge University Press
Besemer, S. P., & O’Quin, K. (1999). Confirming the three-factor Creative Product Analysis Matrix model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1204_6
Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12(1), 29–31. https://doi.org/10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29
Bruner, J. S. (2009). The process of education. Harvard University Press
Calavia, M. B., Blanco, T., & Casas, R. (2021). Fostering creativity as a problem-solving competence through design: Think-Create-Learn, a tool for teachers. Thinking skills and creativity, 39, 100761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100761
Chang, Y. S., Chien, Y. H., Yu, K. C., Chu, Y. H., & Chen, M. Y. C. (2016). Effect of TRIZ on the creativity of engineering students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.003
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press
Dell’Era, C., Magistretti, S., Cautela, C., Verganti, R., & Zurlo, F. (2020). Four kinds of design thinking: From ideating to making, engaging, and criticizing. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(2), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12353
Dewey, J. (1916). 1997). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. The Free Press, New York
Falloon, G., Hatzigianni, M., Bower, M., Forbes, A., & Stevenson, M. (2020). Understanding K-12 STEM education: A framework for developing STEM literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09823-x
Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (2nd ed.). Wiley
Harashima, F., Tomizuka, M., & Fukuda, T. (1996). Mechatronics-“ What Is It, Why, and How?“. An Editorial IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.1996.7827930
Henriksen, D., Mehta, R., & Mehta, S. (2019). Design thinking gives STEAM to teaching: A framework that breaks disciplinary boundaries. In M. S. Khine, & S. Areepattamannil (Eds.), STEAM education (pp. 57–78). Springer
Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking skills and Creativity, 26, 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001
Heyden, E., Küchenhof, J., Greve, E., & Krause, D. (2020). Development of a design education platform for an interdisciplinary teaching concept. Procedia CIRP, 91, 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.213
Hou, H. T. (2012). Exploring the behavioral patterns of learners in an educational massively multiple online role-playing game (MMORPG). Computers & Education, 58(4), 1225–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.015
Hou, H. T. (2015). Integrating cluster and sequential analysis to explore learners’ flow and behavioral patterns in a simulation game with situated-learning context for science courses: A video-based process exploration. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.010
Hou, H. T., & Keng, S. H. (2021). A dual-scaffolding framework integrating peer-scaffolding and cognitive-scaffolding for an augmented reality-based educational board game: An analysis of learners’ collective flow state and collaborative learning behavioral patterns. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), 547–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120969409
Hu, C. C., Yeh, H. C., & Chen, N. S. (2020). Enhancing STEM competence by making electronic musical pencil for non-engineering students. Computers & Education, 150, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103840
Kloser, M., Wilsey, M., Twohy, K. E., Immonen, A. D., & Navotas, A. C. (2018). We do STEM”: Unsettled conceptions of STEM education in middle school STEM classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 118(8), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12304
Lahiri, A., Cormican, K., & Sampaio, S. (2021). Design thinking: From products to projects. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.114
Lämsä, J., Hämäläinen, R., Koskinen, P., Viiri, J., & Mannonen, J. (2020). The potential of temporal analysis: Combining log data and lag sequential analysis to investigate temporal differences between scaffolded and non-scaffolded group inquiry-based learning processes. Computers & Education, 143, 103674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103674
Leicht-Scholten, C., & Steuer-Dankert, L. (2020). Educating engineers for socially responsible solutions through design thinking. In Design Thinking in Higher Education, 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5780-4_11
Lin, K. Y., Hsiao, H. S., Chang, Y. S., Chien, Y. H., & Wu, Y. T. (2018). The effectiveness of using 3D printing technology in STEM project-based learning activities. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(12), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97189
Lin, K. Y., Hsiao, H. S., Williams, P. J., & Chen, Y. H. (2019). Effects of 6E-oriented STEM practical activities in cultivating middle school students’ attitudes toward technology and technological inquiry ability. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1561432
Lin, L., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Shen, S. (2020). From knowledge and skills to digital works: An application of design thinking in the information technology course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100646
Lin, L., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Shen, S. (2020). From knowledge and skills to digital works: An application of design thinking in the information technology course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100646
Lynch, M., Kamovich, U., Longva, K. K., & Steinert, M. (2019). Combining technology and entrepreneurial education through design thinking: Students’ reflections on the learning process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.015
Maher, R., Maher, M., Mann, S., & McAlpine, C. A. (2018). Integrating design thinking with sustainability science: A research through design approach. Sustainability Science, 13(6), 1565–1587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0618-6
Micheli, P., Wilner, S. J., Bhatti, S. H., Mura, M., & Beverland, M. B. (2019). Doing design thinking: Conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(2), 124–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466
Nguyen, T. T. K., Van Bien, N., Lin, P. L., Lin, J., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Measuring teachers’ perceptions to sustain STEM education development. Sustainability, 12(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041531
Öztürk, A. (2021). Meeting the challenges of STEM education in K-12 education through design thinking. Design & Technology Education, 26(1), 70–88
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1974). The child’s conception of quantities (trans. A. J. Pomerans). Routledge & Kegan Paul
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2015). Design thinking: Understand–improve–apply. Springer Science & Business Media
Roth, K., Globocnik, D., Rau, C., & Neyer, A. K. (2020). Living up to the expectations: The effect of design thinking on project success. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(4), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12408
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021
Spyropoulou, N., Glaroudis, D., Iossifides, A., & Zaharakis, I. D. (2020). Fostering secondary students’ STEM career awareness through IoT hands-on educational activities: Experiences and lessons learned. IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.1900288
Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: Integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983
Štuikys, V., & Burbaitė, R. (2018). Challenges of STEM-driven computer science (CS) education. Smart STEM-driven computer science education (pp. 3–29). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78485-4_1
Sun, Z., Lin, C. H., Lv, K., & Song, J. (2021). Knowledge-construction behaviors in a mobile learning environment: A lag-sequential analysis of group differences. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09938-x
Tsai, F. H., Hsiao, H. S., Yu, K. C., & Lin, K. Y. (2021). Development and effectiveness evaluation of a STEM-based game-design project for preservice primary teacher education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09702-5
Vuong, Q. H., La, V. P., Ho, M. T., Pham, T. H., Vuong, T. T., Vuong, H. M., & Nguyen, M. H. (2021). A data collection on secondary school students’ STEM performance and reading practices in an emerging country. Data Intelligence, 3(2), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00091
Watson, A. D. (2015). Design thinking for life. Art Education, 68(3), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2015.11519317
Yakimov, P. I., Asparuhova, K. K., Grigorova, T. G., & Shehova, D. A. (2020, September). Industry 4.0 and the Challenges Faced by STEM Education. In 2020 International Scientific Conference Electronics, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ET50336.2020.9238223
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the “Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences” and “Chinese Language and Technology Center” of National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan, and sponsored by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, R.O.C. under Grant no. 107-2511-H-003 -046 -MY3, 109-2511-H-003 -048 -MY2, 109-2622-H-003-004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hsiao, HS., Chang, YC., Lin, KY. et al. Applying the design thinking model to hands-on mechatronics STEM activities for senior high school students to improve the learning performance and learning behavior. Int J Technol Des Educ 33, 1389–1408 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09778-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09778-7