Skip to main content
Log in

Applying the design thinking model to hands-on mechatronics STEM activities for senior high school students to improve the learning performance and learning behavior

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. A. (2001). Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman

  • Hsiao, H. S., Yu, K. C., Chang, Y. S., Chien, Y. H., Lin, K. Y., Lin, C. Y., Chen, J. C., Chen, J. H., Lin, Y. W. (2017). The Study on Integrating the Design Thinking Model and STEM Activity Unit for Senior High School Living Technology Course. In 2017 7th World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF), 383-390. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF.2017.8467111

  • Hsiao, H. S., Lin, Y. W., Lin, K. Y., Lin, C. Y., Chen, J. H., & Chen, J. C. (2022). Using robot-based practices to develop an activity that incorporated the 6E model to improve elementary school students’ learning performances. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636090

  • Hsiao, H. S., Chen, J. C.*, Lin, C. Y., Zhuo, P. W., & Lin, K. Y. (2019). Using 3D printing technology with experiential learning strategies to improve pre-engineering students’ comprehension of abstract scientific concepts and hands-on ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2),178-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12319

  • Chen, J. C., Huang, Y., Lin, K. Y., Chang, Y. S., Lin, H. C., Lin, C. Y., & Hsiao, H. S. (2020). Developing a hands‐on activity using virtual reality to help students learn by doing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(1),46-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12389

  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge University Press

  • Besemer, S. P., & O’Quin, K. (1999). Confirming the three-factor Creative Product Analysis Matrix model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1204_6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12(1), 29–31. https://doi.org/10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (2009). The process of education. Harvard University Press

  • Calavia, M. B., Blanco, T., & Casas, R. (2021). Fostering creativity as a problem-solving competence through design: Think-Create-Learn, a tool for teachers. Thinking skills and creativity, 39, 100761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. S., Chien, Y. H., Yu, K. C., Chu, Y. H., & Chen, M. Y. C. (2016). Effect of TRIZ on the creativity of engineering students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press

  • Dell’Era, C., Magistretti, S., Cautela, C., Verganti, R., & Zurlo, F. (2020). Four kinds of design thinking: From ideating to making, engaging, and criticizing. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(2), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). 1997). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. The Free Press, New York

  • Falloon, G., Hatzigianni, M., Bower, M., Forbes, A., & Stevenson, M. (2020). Understanding K-12 STEM education: A framework for developing STEM literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09823-x

  • Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (2nd ed.). Wiley

  • Harashima, F., Tomizuka, M., & Fukuda, T. (1996). Mechatronics-“ What Is It, Why, and How?“. An Editorial IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.1996.7827930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, D., Mehta, R., & Mehta, S. (2019). Design thinking gives STEAM to teaching: A framework that breaks disciplinary boundaries. In M. S. Khine, & S. Areepattamannil (Eds.), STEAM education (pp. 57–78). Springer

  • Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking skills and Creativity, 26, 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyden, E., Küchenhof, J., Greve, E., & Krause, D. (2020). Development of a design education platform for an interdisciplinary teaching concept. Procedia CIRP, 91, 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, H. T. (2012). Exploring the behavioral patterns of learners in an educational massively multiple online role-playing game (MMORPG). Computers & Education, 58(4), 1225–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, H. T. (2015). Integrating cluster and sequential analysis to explore learners’ flow and behavioral patterns in a simulation game with situated-learning context for science courses: A video-based process exploration. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, H. T., & Keng, S. H. (2021). A dual-scaffolding framework integrating peer-scaffolding and cognitive-scaffolding for an augmented reality-based educational board game: An analysis of learners’ collective flow state and collaborative learning behavioral patterns. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), 547–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120969409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, C. C., Yeh, H. C., & Chen, N. S. (2020). Enhancing STEM competence by making electronic musical pencil for non-engineering students. Computers & Education, 150, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloser, M., Wilsey, M., Twohy, K. E., Immonen, A. D., & Navotas, A. C. (2018). We do STEM”: Unsettled conceptions of STEM education in middle school STEM classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 118(8), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, A., Cormican, K., & Sampaio, S. (2021). Design thinking: From products to projects. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lämsä, J., Hämäläinen, R., Koskinen, P., Viiri, J., & Mannonen, J. (2020). The potential of temporal analysis: Combining log data and lag sequential analysis to investigate temporal differences between scaffolded and non-scaffolded group inquiry-based learning processes. Computers & Education, 143, 103674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leicht-Scholten, C., & Steuer-Dankert, L. (2020). Educating engineers for socially responsible solutions through design thinking. In Design Thinking in Higher Education, 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5780-4_11

  • Lin, K. Y., Hsiao, H. S., Chang, Y. S., Chien, Y. H., & Wu, Y. T. (2018). The effectiveness of using 3D printing technology in STEM project-based learning activities. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(12), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K. Y., Hsiao, H. S., Williams, P. J., & Chen, Y. H. (2019). Effects of 6E-oriented STEM practical activities in cultivating middle school students’ attitudes toward technology and technological inquiry ability. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1561432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Shen, S. (2020). From knowledge and skills to digital works: An application of design thinking in the information technology course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Shen, S. (2020). From knowledge and skills to digital works: An application of design thinking in the information technology course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., Kamovich, U., Longva, K. K., & Steinert, M. (2019). Combining technology and entrepreneurial education through design thinking: Students’ reflections on the learning process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, R., Maher, M., Mann, S., & McAlpine, C. A. (2018). Integrating design thinking with sustainability science: A research through design approach. Sustainability Science, 13(6), 1565–1587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0618-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheli, P., Wilner, S. J., Bhatti, S. H., Mura, M., & Beverland, M. B. (2019). Doing design thinking: Conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(2), 124–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. T. K., Van Bien, N., Lin, P. L., Lin, J., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Measuring teachers’ perceptions to sustain STEM education development. Sustainability, 12(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk, A. (2021). Meeting the challenges of STEM education in K-12 education through design thinking. Design & Technology Education, 26(1), 70–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1974). The child’s conception of quantities (trans. A. J. Pomerans). Routledge & Kegan Paul

  • Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2015). Design thinking: Understand–improve–apply. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Roth, K., Globocnik, D., Rau, C., & Neyer, A. K. (2020). Living up to the expectations: The effect of design thinking on project success. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(4), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spyropoulou, N., Glaroudis, D., Iossifides, A., & Zaharakis, I. D. (2020). Fostering secondary students’ STEM career awareness through IoT hands-on educational activities: Experiences and lessons learned. IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.1900288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: Integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Štuikys, V., & Burbaitė, R. (2018). Challenges of STEM-driven computer science (CS) education. Smart STEM-driven computer science education (pp. 3–29). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78485-4_1

  • Sun, Z., Lin, C. H., Lv, K., & Song, J. (2021). Knowledge-construction behaviors in a mobile learning environment: A lag-sequential analysis of group differences. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09938-x

  • Tsai, F. H., Hsiao, H. S., Yu, K. C., & Lin, K. Y. (2021). Development and effectiveness evaluation of a STEM-based game-design project for preservice primary teacher education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09702-5

  • Vuong, Q. H., La, V. P., Ho, M. T., Pham, T. H., Vuong, T. T., Vuong, H. M., & Nguyen, M. H. (2021). A data collection on secondary school students’ STEM performance and reading practices in an emerging country. Data Intelligence, 3(2), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. D. (2015). Design thinking for life. Art Education, 68(3), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2015.11519317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakimov, P. I., Asparuhova, K. K., Grigorova, T. G., & Shehova, D. A. (2020, September). Industry 4.0 and the Challenges Faced by STEM Education. In 2020 International Scientific Conference Electronics, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ET50336.2020.9238223

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the “Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences” and “Chinese Language and Technology Center” of National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan, and sponsored by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, R.O.C. under Grant no. 107-2511-H-003 -046 -MY3, 109-2511-H-003 -048 -MY2, 109-2622-H-003-004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jheng-Han Chen.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsiao, HS., Chang, YC., Lin, KY. et al. Applying the design thinking model to hands-on mechatronics STEM activities for senior high school students to improve the learning performance and learning behavior. Int J Technol Des Educ 33, 1389–1408 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09778-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09778-7

Navigation