Abstract
Since 2000, craft practitioners have increasingly adopted digital fabrication technologies. Simultaneously, the public’s engagement in making through various means has escalated, disrupting the makers’ ecosystem. This study explores craft practitioners’ motivation to acquire new digital skills in the context of informal learning and professional development in Hong Kong and how they perceive potential changes in the maker culture and creative industries. This study’s methods consisted of two rounds of semi-structured interviews with 18 craft practitioners as well as participant observations during a short-term workshop in which they learned the basics of digital fabrication technologies. The findings revealed that external variables, such as social influence and facilitating conditions, are as important as personal motivations for craftspeople’s acceptance of technology. Additionally, the study found that technology has not advanced sufficiently to meet craftspeople’s expectations, and understanding of traditional craft skills is essential to take advantage of these technologies. The participants envisioned that technologies would enhance productivity and creativity in their practice and that their digital craftspeople identity would thrive due to the rise of the maker culture. For more effective incorporation of technologies into craft practices, it is suggested that a new curriculum design customized for various types of craft makers be constructed and implemented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Adamson, G. (2007). Thinking Through Craft. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Adamson, G. (2008). When craft gets sloppy. Crafts, 211, 36–41.
Adamson, G. (2013). The invention of craft. Bloomsbury Academic.
Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The new industrial revolution. Random House.
Arantes, L. M. (2019). Mapping Etsy: Reflections on (spatial) relations in an E-commerce for handmade things. In C. Burke & S. M. Spencer-Wood (Eds.), Crafting in the world. Springer.
Atkinson, P. (2006). Do it yourself: Democracy and design. Journal of Design History, 19(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epk001
Bottomley, S., & Gray, J. (2014). Beneath the surface: Digital-craft borderlands in education. Proceedings of All Makers Now?: Craft Values in 21st Century Production, 1, 23–28.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Campbell, C. (2005). The craft consumer: Culture, craft and consumption in a postmodern society. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505049843
Costin, C. L. (2008). Introduction: Craft and social identity. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 8(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.1998.8.1.3
Crabtree, B., & Miller, W. (1999). A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using codebooks. In B. Crabtree & W. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research. Sage.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.
Dormer, P. (1997). Craft and the turing test for practical thinking. In P. Dormer (Ed.), The culture of craft: Status and future. Delhi: Manchester University Press.
England, L. (2018). Crafting professionals: Professional development and entrepreneurship in UK crafts higher education. Proceedings of Making Futures, 5, 1–9.
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
Form, W. (1987). On the degradation of skills. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.13.1.29
Fuller, G., Hamilton, C., & Seale, K. (2013). Working with amateur labour: Between culture and Economy. Cultural Studies Review. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v19i1.3223
Greenhalgh, P. (2002). The persistence of craft: The applied arts today. A&C Black.
Harrod, T. (2007). Otherwise unobtainable: The applied arts and the politics and poetics of digital technology. In S. Alfoldy (Ed.), NeoCraft: Modernity and the crafts. The Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design.
Hartmann, T., & Vanpoucke, E. (2017). User acceptance of technologies in their infancy: The case of 3D printing business models. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 29, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2017040101
Jakob, D., & Thomas, N. J. (2017). Firing up craft capital: The renaissance of craft and craft policy in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23(4), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2015.1068765
Kuznetsov, S., & Paulos, E. (2010). Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. Proceedings of the 6th nordic conference on human-computer interaction: extending boundaries, 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868950
Leadbeater, C., & Miller, P. (2004). The Pro-Am revolution: How enthusiasts are changing our economy and society. Demos.
Lees-Maffei, G., & Sandino, L. (2004). Dangerous liaisons: Relationships between design, craft and art. Journal of Design History, 17(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/17.3.207
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(50), 752–780.
Loh, P., Burry, J., & Wagenfeld, M. (2016). Reconsidering Pye’s theory of making through digital craft practice: A theoretical framework towards continuous designing. Craft Research. https://doi.org/10.1386/crre.7.2.187_1
Luckman, S. (2015). Craft and the creative economy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Luckman, S. (2018). Craft entrepreneurialism and sustainable scale: Resistance to and disavowal of the creative industries as champions of capitalist growth. Cultural Trends: Creative Economy, Critical Perspectives, 27(5), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2018.1534574
Mason, R. (2005). The meaning and value of home-based craft. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 24(3), 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2005.00449.x
Mason, R. (2018). Skilled knowledge and craft education. In E. Garber, L. Hochtritt, M. Sharma, & F. Taylor (Eds.), Makers, crafters, educators: Working for cultural change. Routledge.
McAuley, A., & Fillis, I. (2005). Careers and lifestyles of craft makers in the 21st century. Cultural Trends, 14(2), 139–156.
McCullough, M. (1997). Abstracting craft: The practiced digital hand. MIT press.
McCullough, M. (2015, February). The hand, across twenty years of digital craft [Paper presentation]. ACM TEI 2014, Munich, Germany. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mmmc/PAPERS/HandInDigitalCraft.pdf
Metcalf, B. (2007). Craft education: looking back, looking forward. Bruce Metcalf. https://www.brucemetcalf.com/craft-education-looking-back-lookin
Mishra, P., & Koehler, J. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Nitsche, M., & Weisling, A. (2019). When is it not craft? Materiality and mediation when craft and computing meet. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 683–689). https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3295651
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation (2nd ed.). Sage Press.
Press, M. (2010). What has craft given us? Crafts, 27, 104–106.
Press, M., & Cusworth, A. (1997). A New vision in the making: Exploring the value of craft education in the information age. The Design Journal, 1, 12–29. https://doi.org/10.2752/146069297790219422
Pye, D. (1968). The nature and art of workmanship. Cambridge University Press.
Risatti, H. (2007). A theory of craft: Function and aesthetic expression. University of North Carolina Press.
Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, presumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer.’ Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354673
Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11, 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
Shillito, A. M. (2013). Digital Crafts: Industrial technologies for applied artists and designer makers. Bloomsbury.
Song, M. J. (2018). Learning to teach 3D printing in schools: How do teachers in Korea prepare to integrate 3D printing technology into classrooms? Educational Media International, 55(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1512448
Stein, J. A. (2017). The political imaginaries of 3D printing: Prompting mainstream awareness of design and making. Design and Culture, 9(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2017.1279941
Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013
Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. William Morrow.
Torres, A. M. (2002). Marketing networks as a form of strategic alliance among craft enterprises. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.182
Torrey, C., Churchill, E. F., & McDonald, D. W. (2009). Learning how: The search for craft knowledge on the internet. Proceedings of CHI, 2009, 1371–1380. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518908
UK Crafts Council. (2014). Studying craft: Full report. https://www.craftscouncil.org.uk/documents/885/Studying_Craft_1_full_report_2014.pdf
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 443–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2014-0088
Woodrow, R. (2007). The lure and shame of skill: Studio craft in Australian universities. Craft Arts International, 70, 70–76.
Yair, K., & Schwarz, M. (2011). Making value: Craft in changing times. Cultural Trends, 20(3–4), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2011.589711
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and method (4th ed.). Sage.
Zoran, A. (2015). Hybrid craft: Showcase of physical and digital integration of design and craft skills. Leonardo, 48(4), 384–398.
Zoran, A., & Buechley, L. (2013). Hybrid reassemblage: An exploration of craft, digital fabrication and artifact uniqueness. Leonardo. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00477
The work was fully supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. EdUHK 28606418).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Song, M.J. Craftspeople’s new identity: The impact of digital fabrication technologies on craft practices. Int J Technol Des Educ 32, 2365–2383 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09687-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09687-1