Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of distributed collaboration in design processes: an analysis of design activity on information, problem, and solution

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Design education and practices increasingly involve distributed collaboration. However, its effects on students’ design processes, and on the nature of collaboration instruction, remain unclear. The aim of this study was to extend the present understanding of distributed collaborative design by comparing the design activities regarding information–problem–solution (IPS) in two types of environment: distributed and co-located. We conducted a conceptual design experiment and analysed the different kinds of design activity by encoding the design process using an IPS coding approach. We also measured students’ subjective experiences of their design-related activities using a questionnaire. After examining the distribution, content, transition, and cluster of IPS activities, the comprehensive analysis results showed that the distributed collaborative environment produced negligible effects on the production and interaction of IPS design activities, but affected students’ exploration of design content of IPS activities. By contrast, the questionnaire results indicated that distributed collaboration prompted students to concentrate better, which positively impacted their experiences. This work offers useful insights into distributed collaboration in design education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chandrasekera, T., Vo, N., & D’Souza, N. (2013). The effect of subliminal suggestions on Sudden Moments of Inspiration (SMI) in the design process. Design Studies, 34(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M.-L. (2002). An organizational view of design communication in design collaboration. Design Studies, 23(2), 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, J. Y., & Cho, M.-H. (2014). Student perceptions and performance in online and offline collaboration in an interior design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(4), 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coldefy, F., & Louis-dit-Picard, S. (2007). DigiTable: An interactive multiuser table for collocated and remote collaboration enabling remote gesture visualization. In IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2007 (pp. 1–8). IEEE.

  • Cross, N. (2001). Chapter 5 - Design Cognition: Results from Protocol and other Empirical Studies of Design Activity. In C. M. Eastman, W. M. McCracken, & W. C. Newstetter (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education (pp. 79–103). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y. M. (2003). Function and behavior representation in conceptual mechanical design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 16(5), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060402165024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreamson, N. (2017). Online collaboration in design education: An experiment in real-time manipulation of prototypes and communication. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(2), 188–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eris, O., Martelaro, N., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2014). A comparative analysis of multimodal communication during design sketching in co-located and distributed environments. Design Studies, 35(6), 559–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L., & Marx, M. (2006). Managing creativity in small worlds. California Management Review, 48(4), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Ibáñez, R., Haseki, M., & Shah, C. (2013). Let’s search together, but not too close! An analysis of communication and performance in collaborative information seeking. Information Processing and Management, 49(5), 1165–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J.-C., Yu, K.-C., & Chen, M.-Y. (2011). Collaborative learning in technological project design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(3), 335–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, H., & Kobayashi, M. (1992). ClearBoard: A seamless medium for shared drawing and conversation with eye contact. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1992 (pp. 525–532). ACM.

  • Larsson, A. (2003). Making sense of collaboration: The challenge of thinking together in global design teams. In Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work, 2003 (pp. 153–160). ACM.

  • Lee, S., & Do, E. Y.-L. (2009). The effects of computing technology in creative design tasks: A case study of design collaboration. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on creativity and cognition, 2009 (pp. 387–388). ACM.

  • Magal-Royo, T., Jorda-Albiñana, B., del Rio, J. G., Canellas, O. A., & Gimenez-López, J. (2012). Online collaborative environments in the creative process of product development for engineering students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 677–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. (2004). Collaboration: The challenge of ICT. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(2), 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulet, E., Chulvi, V., Royo, M., & Galán, J. (2016). Influence of the dominant thinking style in the degree of novelty of designs in virtual and traditional working environments. Journal of Engineering Design, 27(7), 413–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulet, E., Escamilla, N., Chulvi, V., Garcia-Garcia, C., Felip, F., & Galán, J. (2013). Analysis of students opinion about a creative design experience by means of virtual sincronous teams. In the 15th international conference on engineering and product design education, 2013 (pp. 126–131).

  • Nissen, H. A., Evald, M. R., & Clarke, A. H. (2014). Knowledge sharing in heterogeneous teams through collaboration and cooperation: Exemplified through public–private-innovation partnerships. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 473–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paroutis, S., & Al Saleh, A. (2009). Determinants of knowledge sharing using Web 2.0 technologies. Journal of knowledge management, 13(4), 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauchet, A., Coldefy, F., Lefebvre, L., Picard, S. L. D., Perron, L., et al. (2007). TableTops: Worthwhile experiences of collocated and remote collaboration. In Second annual IEEE international workshop on horizontal interactive human–computer systems (TABLETOP’07), 10–12 October 2007 (pp. 27–34).

  • Rice, D. J., Davidson, B. D., Dannenhoffer, J. F., & Gay, G. K. (2007). Improving the effectiveness of virtual teams by adapting team processes. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 16(6), 567–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safin, S., Juchmes, R., & Leclercq, P. (2013). Use of graphical modality in a collaborative design distant setting. In From research to practice in the design of cooperative systems: Results and open challenges, London, 2012 (pp. 245–260). Springer.

  • Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A., & DeSanctis, V. (1986). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 34(3), 29–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377366.1986.10401080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, R.-D., & Iryna, B. (2012). The influence of online communication and Web-Based Collaboration Environments on group collaboration and performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 935–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoff, S. J., & Maher, M. L. (2000). Analysing participation in collaborative design environments. Design Studies, 21(2), 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sopensky, E. (1994). The skill and art of collaboration. Technical communication, 41(4), 709–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stempfle, J., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Thinking in design teams-an analysis of team communication. Design Studies, 23(5), 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., Xiang, W., Chai, C., Wang, C., & Huang, Q. (2014a). Creative segment: A descriptive theory applied to computer-aided sketching. Design Studies, 35(1), 54–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., Xiang, W., Chai, C., Yang, Z., & Zhang, K. (2014b). Designers’ perception during sketching: An examination of creative segment theory using eye movements. Design Studies, 35(6), 593–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2014.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suwa, M., Purcell, T., & Gero, J. (1998). Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers’ cognitive actions. Design Studies, 19(4), 455–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H., Lee, Y., & Gero, J. (2011). Comparing collaborative co-located and distributed design processes in digital and traditional sketching environments: A protocol study using the function–behaviour–structure coding scheme. Design Studies, 32(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J. C., & Minneman, S. (1991). VideoWhiteboard: Video shadows to support remote collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1991 (pp. 315–322). ACM.

  • Wiltschnig, S., Christensen, B. T., & Ball, L. J. (2013). Collaborative problem–solution co-evolution in creative design. Design Studies, 34(5), 515–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, W., Sun, L., Chen, S., Yang, Z., & Liu, Z. (2015). The role of mental models in collaborative sketching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9269-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M. C. (2009). Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design, 20(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Design Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    Zhiyuan Yang, Wei Xiang, Weitao You & Lingyun Sun

  2. Key Laboratory of Design Intelligence and Digital Creativity of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China

    Zhiyuan Yang, Wei Xiang, Weitao You & Lingyun Sun

  3. Alibaba-Zhejiang University Joint Institute of Frontier Technologies, Hangzhou, China

    Zhiyuan Yang, Wei Xiang, Weitao You & Lingyun Sun

Authors
  1. Zhiyuan Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Xiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weitao You
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lingyun Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Xiang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Z., Xiang, W., You, W. et al. The influence of distributed collaboration in design processes: an analysis of design activity on information, problem, and solution. Int J Technol Des Educ 31, 587–609 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09565-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09565-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation