Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis on trends of technology education shown in national curriculum at the elementary level in Republic of Korea

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study discusses the past and present of technology education in elementary schools of the Republic of Korea through an understanding of practical arts, one of the subjects taught in Korean elementary schools. Since technology education is carried out in Korean elementary schools through a subject called practical arts, it can be said that understanding the academic system and education curriculum of practical arts equates to understanding technology education being taught in elementary schools in Korea. There are three main contents of this study. First, the position of technology education in Korean elementary schools, the meaning of technology education activities, and the teaching system were examined by way of reviewing the practical arts in Korea. Second, the period, education thought, and key concepts of Korea’s technology education were analyzed by section as the researcher examined the development process of technology education in the practical arts curriculum. Third, the researcher comparatively analyzed the current 2015 Practical Arts Curriculum in Korea and technology education issues at the international level, and based on this, the researcher discussed the subject of developing technology education. The study found that in Korea, the practical arts curriculum underwent revision and development according to education thought over six time periods: subject-based curriculum in the first period from 1955 to 1962; experience-based curriculum in the second period from 1963 to 1972; discipline-based curriculum in the third period from 1973 to 1981; general education curriculum in the fourth period from 1982 to 1991; theme-based integrated curriculum in the fifth period from 1992 to 1996; and learning-based curriculum in the sixth period from 1997 to 2014. The most recent revision from 2015 represents competency-based education thought in the curriculum. The competencies related to technology education that are presented in the 2015 revision include technology problem-solving ability, technology system planning ability, and technology application ability. With these, the curriculum focuses on enhancing the ability to apply skills and generate new knowledge in the context of living, which can be interpreted as a new value for technology education to pursue in the age of competency-based education: “practicing knowledge rather than simply knowing.” In addition, based on the new curriculum content framework, technological literacy was reconceptualized as “what students should know” and “what students should be able to do”, suggesting a new approach to technological literacy in the competency-based education age. Additionally, in such an age, the curriculum’s responsibilities and ethics are presented as issues that should be considered anew, making it clearer what the next tasks should be in order to better improve the curriculum. The results of this study will be meaningful in providing insight into the current direction of elementary-level technology education in Korea and also into the future direction of technology education in Korea and around the world in today’s age of competency-based education by analyzing and comparing Korea’s case with international cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, S. (2000). Does the need for high levels of performance curtail the development of creativity in design and technology project work? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(3), 255–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., & Goffer, N. (2002). Fostering systematic innovative thinking and problem solving: Lessons education can learn from industry. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(3), 227–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, S., & Watson, V. (2006). Shifting the frame: Exploring integration of the key competencies at six normal schools. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y. (1992). A study on the conceptual model of the technological literacy for technology education. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 11(1), 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S. (2004). Principles of practical arts education. Seoul: Kyohaksa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S., & Song, H. (2002). A study on the specification of practical art curriculum. Korean Journal of Practical Arts Education Research, 2(1), 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, R. (2000). Ethical judgements in genetic engineering: the implications for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(3), 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, M. J., Fletcher, S., Kruse, S., Labudde, P., Lang, M., Mammes, I., et al. (2016). Technology education today: international perspectives. New York: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S. (1993). Planning integrated curriculum: The call to adventure. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S., & Burns, R. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, A. (2017). Educating ethical designers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(4), 655–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipkins, R. (2006). The nature of the key competencies: A background paper. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M. (2005). Creative thinking, values and design and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(1), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyke, H. (2001). Toward an ethics of technologies as prostheses. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(1), 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, E., & Go, I. (2017). Study on achievement standards of assessment criteria and assessment standards in the world of technology of practical arts in 2015 revised curriculum. Korean Journal of Practical Arts Education Research, 23(1), 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Y., Kim, Y., & Go, I. (2016). A Study of ‘world of technology’ domains of practical arts in 2015 revision elementary school practical arts curriculum. Korean Journal of Practical Arts Education Research, 21(1), 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2003). The development of a national curriculum in technology for New Zealand. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(1), 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2002). An analysis of the possibilities and Limitations of the National Curriculum 2009 in Korea. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(3), 57–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. R., Lee, C. H., & Kim, K. S. (2013). A study of the investigation into engineering technology ethics education in secondary technology education. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 13(3), 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. (2009). An exploration on improvement of National Curriculum Standards documental system. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(4), 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. (2009). Creativity in technology education: Providing children with glimpses of their inventive potential. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(3), 255–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, Y. (2019). Analysis of instruction status and need for enhancing the subject competencies of technology education. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 75–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, M. (2003). Curriculum change and the post-modern world: Is the school curriculum-reform movement an anachronism? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(2), 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, J. (1990). Curriculum—A comprehensive introduction (4th ed.). New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Min, Y. (2003). The investigation and application on the criteria for contents selection in the learner-centered curriculum—Focused on the 7th national curriculum amendment documents. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 3(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1992). The 6th Practical Arts Curriculum Notification No. 1992-16 of the Ministry of Education. Seoul: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1997). The 7th Practical Arts Curriculum Notification No. 1997-15 of the Ministry of Education. Seoul: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2015). The 2015 revision Practical Arts(Technology & Home) Curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Culture. (1955). The 1st Practical Arts Curriculum Notification No. 44 of the Ministry of Education. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Culture. (1963). The 2nd Practical Arts Curriculum Notification No. 119 of the Ministry of Education. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Culture. (1973). The 3rd Practical Arts Curriculum Notification No. 310 of the Ministry of Education. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Culture. (1981). The 4th Practical Arts Curriculum Notification No. 442 of the Ministry of Education. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Culture. (1987). The 5th Practical Arts Curriculum Notification No. 87-9 of the Ministry of Education. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development. (2007). The 2007 revision Practical Arts(Technology & Home) Curriculum Notification No. 87-9 of the Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development. Seoul: Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Science Technology. (2009). The 2009 revision Practical Arts (Technology & Home) Curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Science Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, W. (1986). Curriculum perspective, paradigm, and possibility. NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. School Review, 78, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • So, K. (2007). An investigation into tasks for reforming national curriculum: Reflection on curriculum 2007. Asian Journal of Education, 8(2), 135–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. ERIC ED380910.

  • Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory Practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. (1980). Curriculum development: Theory practice (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Hsu, P. S. (2013). Using creative problem solving to promote students’ performance of concept mapping. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(4), 1093–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of Curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, A., Campbell, C., & Jane, B. (2006). Enhancing the creative process for learning in primary technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16(3), 221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, S. (2001). Challenges and improvement measure of Korean technology education to meet knowledge-based society. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 1(1), 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zais, R. (1976). Curriculum-principles and foundation. New York: Thomas Y Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sejong City Office of Education, Sejong, Republic of Korea

    Ingyu Go

Authors
  1. Ingyu Go
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingyu Go.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Go, I. Analysis on trends of technology education shown in national curriculum at the elementary level in Republic of Korea. Int J Technol Des Educ 31, 223–254 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09555-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09555-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation