Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing spatial ability and mechanical reasoning through a STEM course

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a clear contemporary interest for developing science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) at schools. Besides, there exist a lot of research that justify the importance of spatial ability to obtain success in STEM subjects. Nevertheless, the spatial ability is relatively ignored in the general practice of teaching and learning in the K-12 setting. The goal of this paper is to analyse the evolution of spatial abilities of students that assist to a STEM course. Additionally, the evolution of their mechanical reasoning is also analysed. The STEM course was designed and implemented for the first time in a 6th grade class (primary school) and a 7th grade class (secondary school) throughout a whole academic year. First, the spatial ability and the mechanical reasoning of the students were assessed with the corresponding prepared pre-tests. Then, after finishing the STEM course, the students were tested with analogous post-tests. An exhaustive analysis of the obtained results is provided in the paper. It is shown that the spatial ability of the students was definitely improved. Furthermore, this improvement was statistically significant. Results also evidenced that the mechanical reasoning of the participants was also improved, although the improvement was not statistically significant. Moreover, this research showed that, in general, obtained results do not depend significantly on the gender of the participants. Finally, results manifested the statistically significant difference of spatial ability between 6th grade and 7th grade students. The difference between grade levels was not as significant in the mechanical reasoning case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. http://www.corestandards.org/Math/.

  2. http://www.fischertechnik.de/en/home.aspx..

  3. http://www.spatiallearning.org/.

References

  • Andersen, L. (2014). Visual-spatial ability: Important in STEM, ignored in gifted education. Roeper Review, 36(2), 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, M. (2008). Spatial ability in primary school: Effects of the Tridio® learning material, Master thesis of psychology. University of Twente, Enschede.

  • Bell, D. (2016). The reality of STEM education, design and technology teachers’ perceptions: A phenomenographic study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26, 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, G. (2008). Bennett mechanical comprehension test. San Antonio: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board, N. S. (2010). Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators: Identifying and developing our nation’s human capital. Washington: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrol, J. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Standford, CA: Standford University, School of Education Aptitude Research Project.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Contero, M., Naya, F., Company, P., & Saorn, J. L. (2006). Learning support tools for developing spatial abilities in engineering design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 470–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuperman, D., & Verner, I. (2015). Fostering analogical reasoning and design skills through creating bio-inspired robotic models. In Procedia conference on life cycle engineering (CIRP) (Vol. 36 pp. 285–290).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Kit of factor referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. (1951). The description of aptitude and achievement tests in terms of rotated factors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32, 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L., Lubinski, D., & Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 250–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julià, C., & Antolí, J. Ò. (2016). Spatial ability learning through educational robotics. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(2), 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. (2016). Influence of design training and spatial solution strategies on spatial ability performance. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26, 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A. S., & Schunn, C. D. (2017). Applying math onto mechanisms: Mechanistic knowledge is associated with the use of formal mathematical strategies. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 6. doi:10.1186/s41235-016-0044-1.

  • Lohman, D. (1979). Spatial ability: A review and reanalysis of the correlational literature. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, T. (1987). Spatial teaching. The Science Teacher, 54(2), 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences, 459, 344–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (PSVT:R). Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 69–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 889–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, A. F., & Agogino, A. M. (2004). Supporting mechanical reasoning with a representationally-rich learning environment. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 97–104. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00794.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMunn, R. (2012). Mechanical comprehension test. Sample mechanical comprehension test questions and answers. London: How2become Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, S., Donohue, S., & Moore, C. (2012). Spatial skills: A focus on gender and engineering. Resource document. http://www.engageengineering.org/associations/11559/files/ARP_SpatialSkills.pdf. Accessed June 2014

  • National Governors Association. (2007). Building a science, technology, engineering and math agenda. Retrieved from: https://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/2007/0702INNOVATIONSTEM.PDF. Accessed August 2017

  • Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. (2000). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).

  • Ritz, J. M., & Fan, S. C. (2015). STEM and technology education: International stat-of-the-art. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25, 429–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorby, S. A. (2009). Educational research in developing 3-d spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, K., & Williams, A. (2007). Spatial cognition and its implications for design. Hong Kong: International Association of Societies of Design Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner, I. (2004). Robot manipulations: A synergy of visualization, computation and action for spatial instruction. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Av. Països Catalans, 26, 43007, Tarragona, Spain

    Carme Julià

  2. Col·legi Teresià de Tortosa, Rosselló, 31-37, 43500, Tortosa, Spain

    Juan Òscar Antolì

Authors
  1. Carme Julià
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Òscar Antolì
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carme Julià.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Julià, C., Antolì, J.Ò. Enhancing spatial ability and mechanical reasoning through a STEM course. Int J Technol Des Educ 28, 957–983 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9428-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9428-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation