Advertisement

Impacts of innovativeness and attitude on entrepreneurial intention: among engineering and non-engineering students

  • Kris M. Y. Law
  • Kristijan Breznik
Article

Abstract

This study attempted to explore the impacts of attitudinal antecedents on students’ entrepreneurial intention. Comparisons between students of engineering and non-engineering backgrounds and gender groups were made. Total of 998 students from universities in Hong Kong were surveyed, leading to a number of highlights in the study. First, it is found that the learning motivation strongly correlates with innovativeness, which in return affects the entrepreneurship intention. Second, the educational measures designed for senior year students would be slightly different from those for junior year students, whilst the junior year students may need more facilitation to motivate their learning. Thirdly, the ‘innovativeness’ of engineering students is found significantly and strongly correlated to ‘self-efficacy’ and significantly to ‘attitude’. The ‘attitude’ of engineering students is found more significantly contributing to their ‘entrepreneurial intention’. The interesting results show that for engineering students, though perceiving higher levels of innovativeness, ‘attitudes’ and ‘entrepreneurial intention’, the critical attributes in determining ‘entrepreneurial intention’ are ‘attitudes’ and ‘self-efficacy’. Fourthly, attitudes seem a lot more influencing to the entrepreneurial intention among female students, whilst ‘innovation’ is the a lot more influencing among male students. There are some limitations in this study, such as the sample size and survey design. In order to secure a high level of content validity, some items of the constructs are excluded possibly due to the sample size and the uneven numbers of the different sample groups. Future study is recommended to include students from different countries in order to have more representative results, and the research model could be further extended to explore the effects of other demographic parameters.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial intention Engineering education Engineering students Innovativeness Attitude 

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behavior. New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, D. M. (2008). Design for manufacturability and concurrent engineering. Cambria, CA: CIM Press.Google Scholar
  4. Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and ansent entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 24, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: Meta-analysis review. British Journal of Social Science, 40(4), 471–499.Google Scholar
  6. Autio, E., Keeley, R., Klofsten, M., Parker, G., & Hay, M. (2001). Entrepreneurial intent among students in Scandinavia and in the USA. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2(2), 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Babnik, K., & TrunkSirca, N. (2014). Knowledge creation, transfer and retention: The case of intergenerational cooperation. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 15(4), 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brooks, R., Green, W. S., Hubbard, R. G., Jain, D., Katehi, L., McLendon, G., et al. (2007). Entrepreneurship in American Higher Education. Report from the Kauffman Panel on Entrepreneurship Curriculum in Higher Education.Google Scholar
  9. Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S., & Weilerstein, P. (2013). Entrepreneurship: Its role in engineering education. The bridge: The bridge on undergraduate engineering education. National Academy of Engineering, 43(2), 35.Google Scholar
  10. Bygrave, W., & Zacharakis, A. (2008). Entrepreneurship (1st ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Chin, W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655–690). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Da Silva, G. B., Costa, H. C., & De Barros, M. D. (2015). Entrepreneurship in engineering education: A literature review. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6), 1701–1710.Google Scholar
  13. Pryor J. H., DeAngelo, L., Blake, L. P., Hurtado, S., & Tran, S. (2012). The American Freshman: National Norms Fall 2011. UCLA Higher Education Research Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Dermol, V., & Cater, T. (2013). The influence of training and training transfer factors on organisational learning and performance. Personnel Review, 42(3), 324–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dickson, P. H., Solomon, G. T., & Weaver, K. W. (2008). Entrepreneurial selection and success: Does education matter? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(2), 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dutta, D., Li, J., & Merenda, M. (2010). Fostering entrepreneurship: Impact of specialization and diversity in education. Berlin: International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, April. Springer Science + Business Media LLC.Google Scholar
  17. Esposito Vinzi, V., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS path modeling: from foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler & H. Wang (eds.), Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 47–82). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., & Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Assessing the impact of entrepreneruship education programs: A new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(9), 701–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fiet, J. (2001). The theoretical side of teaching entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gird, A., & Bagraim, J. (2008). The theory of planned behaviour as predictor of entrepreneurial intent amongst final-year university students. South African Journal of Psychology, 38(4), 711–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta, V., Turban, D., Wasti, S., & Sikdar, A. (2005). Entrepreneurship and stereotypes: Are entrepreneurs from Mars or from Venus?” Paper presented at the Academy of Management conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  23. Hair, J., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hisrich, R. D., Peters, M. P., & Shepherd, D. A. (2008). Entrepreneurship (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Kolvereid, L. (1996). Predictions of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1), 47–57.Google Scholar
  27. Kolvereid, L., & Isaksen, E. (2006). New business start-up and subsequent entry into self-employment. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 866–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krueger, N., Reilly, M., & Carsrud, A. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Langowitz, N., & Minniti, M. (2007). The entrepreneurial propensity of women. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Linan, F., Rodriguez-Cohard, J. C., & Cantuche, J. M. (2011). Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: A role for education. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lo, C., Sun, H., & Law, K. M. Y. (2012). Comparing the entrepreneurial intention between female and male engineering students. Journal of Women Entrepreneurship., 1, 28–51.Google Scholar
  32. Lohmöller, J. B. (1989). Latent variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luthje, C., & Franke, N. (2003). The ‘making’ of an entrepreneur: Testing a model of entrepreneurial intent among engineering students at MIT. R&D Management, 33, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mäkimurto-Koivumaa, S., & Belt, P. (2015). About, for, in or through entrepreneurship in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education,. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2015.1095163.Google Scholar
  35. Maritz, A., & Brown, C. R. (2013). Illuminating the black box of entrepreneurship education programs. Education + Training, 55(3), 234–252.Google Scholar
  36. Matlay, H. (2005). Researching entrepreneurship and education: Part 1: What is entrepreneurship and does it matter? Education + Training, 47(89), 665–677.Google Scholar
  37. Mbaziira, S., & Oyedokun, C. (2007). Advancing entrepreneurship education in Namibia: A practical approach. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Innovation, the Polytechnic of Namibia, 24–25 October.Google Scholar
  38. Nelson, A. J., & Byers, T. (2010). Challenges in university technology transfer and the promising role of entrepreneurship education. Kauffman: Emerging Scholars Initiatives.Google Scholar
  39. Novak, A., Čepar, Ž., & Trunk, A. (2016). The role of expected years of schooling among life expectancy determinants. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 20(1), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Connor, A. (2013). A conceptual framework for entrepreneurship education policy: Meeting government and economic purposes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 546–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pekkinen, L., Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J., & Harkonen, J. (2015). evaluating sources of risks in large engineering projects: The roles of equivocality and uncertainty. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 4(2), 163–180.Google Scholar
  42. Peterfreund, A. R. (2013). Epicenter baseline survey: Report of findings. Available online at http://sagefoxgroup.com/epicenter.
  43. R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
  44. Radharamanan, R., & Juang, J.-N. (2012). Innovation and entrepreneurship in engineering education at MUSE. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 35(1), 25–36. doi: 10.1080/02533839.2012.624797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sanchez, J. C. (2011). University training for entrepreneurial competencies: Its impact on intention of venture creation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sanchez, G. (2013). PLS path modeling with R. Berkeley: Trowchez Editions.Google Scholar
  47. Sanchez, G., & Trinciguera, L. (2013). PLSPM: Partial least squares data analysis methods. R package version 0.2-2.Google Scholar
  48. Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (pp. 1–36). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programs raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 566–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004). A global goodness of fit index for PLS structural equation modeling. In Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting, Contributed Papers, CLEUP, Padova (pp. 739–742).Google Scholar
  51. Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2009). Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change (4th ed.). England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. van Gelderen, M., Brand, M., vanPraag, M., Bodewes, W., Poutsma, E., & van Gils, A. (2008). Explaining entrepreneurial intentions by means of the theory of planned behaviour. Career Development International, 13, 538–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Verheul, I., VanStel, A., & Thurik, R. (2006). Explaining female and male entrepreneurship at the country level. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18, 151–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FJ 408, Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHunghomHong Kong
  2. 2.International School for Social and Business StudiesCeljeSlovenia

Personalised recommendations