Give us something to react to and make it rich: designers reflecting-in-action with external representations
- 232 Downloads
Designers give themselves something to react to and they make it rich. During design, what they react to can take many forms: a homepage wireframe, an Excel spreadsheet, building drawings, and a Tweet prototype. Using a phenomenological research design using an interactive methodology and multiple data collection methods, the researchers looked at designers reflecting-in-action. A research question was: What is the impact of reflection-in-action on evaluation processes while a design is in progress and not yet complete? Focusing specifically on a theme that emerged from this research question, this manuscript explores eight designers, who while reflecting-in-action, took stock in and reacted to external representations, which were rich in context, information, and constraints. It delves into the experiences that these multidisciplinary designers had in their respective design spaces reacting to and evaluating external representations. The researchers looked at how rich external representations intertwined in context, information, and constraints helped designers move to partial solutions that moved the design forward. The researchers discuss implications for students and teachers, and share a design experience where inexperienced designers (as university students) can practice taking stock in and reacting to external representations.
KeywordsExternal representations Multidisciplinary Reflection-in-action Reflective conversations Frame experiments Design thinking Designing
- Baaki, J. (2014). Effects of interdisciplinary designers reflecting-in-action during design (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest/UMI.Google Scholar
- Bansal, S., Gaffar, A., & Dalrymple O. (2015). Building faculty experts in outcome-based education curriculum design. In Frontiers in education conference (FIE), 2015.32614.2015. IEEE (pp. 1–8). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
- Dorst, K. (2012). How design can improve public spaces [Video]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPsmww461pI.
- Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Huybrechts, L., Schoffelen, J., Schepers, S., & Braspenning, L. (2012). Design representations: Connecting, making, and reflecting in design research education. In D. Boutsen (Ed.), Good practices best practices: Highlighting the compound idea of education, creativity, research, and practice (pp. 35–42). Brussels: Sint-Lucas School of Architecture.Google Scholar
- Keenan, D. S. (2013). Experiential learning and outcome-based education: A bridge too far within the current education and training paradigm. Journal of Applied Learning Technology, 3(2), 13–18.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Boston: Basic Books Inc.Google Scholar
- Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Stables, K. (2008). Designing matters, designing minds: The importance of nurturing the designerly in young people. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 13(3), 8–18.Google Scholar
- Strimel, G. J. (2014). Engineering design: A cognitive process approach. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from: Dissertation Abstract International.Google Scholar
- The Design Thinking Process (2012). Retrieved from http://dschool.stanford.edu/redesigningtheater/the-design-thinking-process/.